Oh boy... not this bullshit again.
First of all, it's important to note Dr. Lönnig - who Ben Stein dragged out of obscurity to misrepresent his research his research - didn't disprove evolution; he simply claims not to have observed any beneficial mutations. The fact that Lönnig is tremendously biased is well known and sufficient, in itself, to cast a shadow on his research.
So let's recap: someone with a bias (he assumes intelligent design to be the "default" starting position for scientific inquiry, and assumes that it's proven unless disproven) does some "research" and writes a shitty, biased paper that peer-review proceeds to tear to shreds.
Now, some (like Wiggs) may believe this guy's "research" as a disproof of evolution. Alas,
actual evidence trumps unsubstantiated beliefs: The
facts are that, in addition to a rich fossil record, we have evidence of evolution and natural selection. Even if you forget the fossil record. Look at drug-resistant tuberculosis or HIV strains. Look at people who breed plants which have used mutation breeding techniques for decades.
http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/11/quantum-physics-proves-that-there-is-an-afterlife-claims-scientist.html
I don't think that "prove" means what the author of this article thinks it means. It's a theory, but then again, the bar for what qualifies as a theory is pretty low. All you need for a theory (from a scientific standpoint) is to explain some observation and make testable predictions and *boom* you've got a theory.
Dr. Lanza is certainly a brilliant biologist, but I find biocentrism to be a lot of feel-good mumbo jumbo. His understanding of quantum mechanics also seems... let's be polite and just say imperfect instead of tenuous.
