Author Topic: 92 MILLION AMERICANS NOT IN LABOR FORCE  (Read 780 times)

Tedim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4144
  • "Ну GetBig, ну погоди"

temple_of_dis

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 886
  • togtfo
Re: 92 MILLION AMERICANS NOT IN LABOR FORCE
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2014, 09:19:29 AM »
so unemployment is about 33%?
wow

democrat TV got bamaz bakk

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: 92 MILLION AMERICANS NOT IN LABOR FORCE
« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2014, 05:14:43 PM »
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-01-10/people-not-labor-force-soar-record-918-million-participation-rate-plunges-1978-level



what a failure......


Total failure. The government should create jobs. Welcome Comrade you will make a fine socialist.

Tedim

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4144
  • "Ну GetBig, ну погоди"
Re: 92 MILLION AMERICANS NOT IN LABOR FORCE
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2014, 06:23:22 AM »

Total failure. The government should create jobs. Welcome Comrade you will make a fine socialist.

Been there done that.....pass, thanks.

Archer77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14174
  • Team Shizzo
Re: 92 MILLION AMERICANS NOT IN LABOR FORCE
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2014, 06:32:35 AM »
And we have millions more ready to be granted the right to compete in this horrible job market.
A

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: 92 MILLION AMERICANS NOT IN LABOR FORCE
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2014, 07:23:28 AM »

Total failure. The government should create jobs. Welcome Comrade you will make a fine socialist.
this stupidity again eh?

so thinking that the govt should get out of the way is the same thing as saying the govt should create jobs?

libtard logic follks

SCRUBS

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 429
Re: 92 MILLION AMERICANS NOT IN LABOR FORCE
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2014, 09:10:49 PM »

macos

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1536
  • Jamie Dimon get some $$ please.
Re: 92 MILLION AMERICANS NOT IN LABOR FORCE
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2014, 12:12:00 AM »
What is all the fuss about?
The go ernment should have ensured jobs instead of unemployment benefits in the first place.
$