Author Topic: Dinesh D'Souza Indicted In Manhattan Federal Court For Campaign Finance Fraud  (Read 554 times)

Skeletor

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15665
  • Silence you furry fool!
Former College President Indicted In Manhattan Federal Court For Campaign Finance Fraud

Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and George Venizelos, the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), announced today an Indictment charging DINESH D’SOUZA with violating the federal campaign finance laws by making illegal contributions to a United States Senate campaign in the names of others and causing false statements to be made to the Federal Election Commission in connection with those contributions. D’SOUZA is expected to be presented and arraigned tomorrow in Manhattan federal court before U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman.

http://www.justice.gov/usao/nys/pressreleases/January14/DineshDSouzaCharges.php

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63738
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
The president has a list and I bet this guy is on it.  Dummy should have known better after doing the documentary.  (Assuming he did something wrong.)

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
The president has a list and I bet this guy is on it.  Dummy should have known better after doing the documentary.  (Assuming he did something wrong.)

LOL


Victor VonDoom

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1424
  • ...and Doom shall control the world!

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63738
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
"Straw-donor cases have been brought against prominnent individuals from time to time. For example, in 2011, a prominent Los Angeles attorney, Pierce O’Donnell, pleaded guilty to misdemeanor chargest of making $20,000 in donations to the presidential campaign of former Sen. John Edwards and reimbursing straw donors."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/conservative-author-and-pundit-dinesh-dsouza-charged-in-campaign-finance-case/2014/01/23/69c67ee4-848a-11e3-bbe5-6a2a3141e3a9_story.html

I wonder if O'Donnell was initially charged with a felony?   

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63738
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
DINESH D’SOUZA PLEADS NOT GUILTY, RELEASED ON $500,000 BOND AS MORE DETAILS EMERGE ON ALLEGED CAMPAIGN FRAUD
Jan. 24, 2014
Jason Howerton


NEW YORK (TheBlaze/AP) — Dinesh D’Souza, the conservative scholar who made the documentary “2016: Obama’s America,” pleaded not guilty on Friday to charges that he violated campaign finance laws and was released on $500,000 bond. His travel was also reportedly restricted to the United States.

A Republican candidate told government investigators that a conservative scholar and author lied to her about the source of donations made to her U.S. Senate campaign, a prosecutor disclosed at an arraignment Friday. The candidate, Wendy Long, made the statement to investigators as they were building a case against D’Souza, 52, Assistant U.S. Attorney Carrie Cohen said. Long lost to Democratic incumbent Kirsten Gillibrand in last year’s election in New York.

The prosecutor said that D’Souza was indicted after he directed an individual who worked for him and another person who lived with him to each make $10,000 in donations to Long’s campaign with the understanding that he would reimburse them for their contributions, which he did soon afterward.

Cohen made the disclosures as D’Souza, 52, of San Diego, pleaded not guilty to charges that he violated campaign finance laws. He was released on $500,000 bond and his travel was restricted to the United States.

His lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, told U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman there was not much dispute about what happened.

“I think there’s a dispute over how it happened and whether what happened violated federal law,” Brafman said.

He said he had been in discussions with the government for some time before his client was indicted and had hoped to convince prosecutors that criminal charges were inappropriate.

Outside court, Brafman said there was no corrupt intent, a necessary component of the law, in his client’s actions, and he said the $20,000 in donations fell short of the $25,000 required to bring a criminal case. He said it was a situation that was normally resolved with a fine rather than criminal charges.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/01/24/dinesh-dsouza-pleads-not-guilty-released-on-500000-bond-as-more-details-emerge-on-alleged-campaign-fraud/

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
DINESH D’SOUZA PLEADS NOT GUILTY, RELEASED ON $500,000 BOND AS MORE DETAILS EMERGE ON ALLEGED CAMPAIGN FRAUD
Jan. 24, 2014
Jason Howerton


NEW YORK (TheBlaze/AP) — Dinesh D’Souza, the conservative scholar who made the documentary “2016: Obama’s America,” pleaded not guilty on Friday to charges that he violated campaign finance laws and was released on $500,000 bond. His travel was also reportedly restricted to the United States.

A Republican candidate told government investigators that a conservative scholar and author lied to her about the source of donations made to her U.S. Senate campaign, a prosecutor disclosed at an arraignment Friday. The candidate, Wendy Long, made the statement to investigators as they were building a case against D’Souza, 52, Assistant U.S. Attorney Carrie Cohen said. Long lost to Democratic incumbent Kirsten Gillibrand in last year’s election in New York.

The prosecutor said that D’Souza was indicted after he directed an individual who worked for him and another person who lived with him to each make $10,000 in donations to Long’s campaign with the understanding that he would reimburse them for their contributions, which he did soon afterward.

Cohen made the disclosures as D’Souza, 52, of San Diego, pleaded not guilty to charges that he violated campaign finance laws. He was released on $500,000 bond and his travel was restricted to the United States.

His lawyer, Benjamin Brafman, told U.S. District Judge Richard M. Berman there was not much dispute about what happened.

“I think there’s a dispute over how it happened and whether what happened violated federal law,” Brafman said.


He said he had been in discussions with the government for some time before his client was indicted and had hoped to convince prosecutors that criminal charges were inappropriate.

Outside court, Brafman said there was no corrupt intent, a necessary component of the law, in his client’s actions, and he said the $20,000 in donations fell short of the $25,000 required to bring a criminal case. He said it was a situation that was normally resolved with a fine rather than criminal charges.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2014/01/24/dinesh-dsouza-pleads-not-guilty-released-on-500000-bond-as-more-details-emerge-on-alleged-campaign-fraud/


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63738
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Filmmaker prosecution revives accusations of conservative targeting
Published January 27, 2014
FoxNews.com

Less than a year after the IRS admitted to singling out Tea Party and other like-minded groups, federal agencies and prosecutors once again are facing accusations of going tougher on conservatives than their liberal counterparts.

In a case that riled conservative filmmakers and producers, federal prosecutors last week announced campaign finance charges against Dinesh D'Souza, the documentarian behind an anti-President Obama film released during the 2012 presidential campaign.

D'Souza pleaded not guilty on Friday, though his attorney did not outright deny that a violation of some kind may have occurred.

But colleagues rallied to D'Souza's defense, calling the decision to prosecute the case politically motivated.

"When you make a film that hits the president between the eyes and could shift an election, you become a target," conservative filmmaker Dennis Michael Lynch told Fox News, referring to D'Souza's "2016: Obama's America."

Producer Gerald Molen, in a statement to FoxNews.com, called it a "selective prosecution."

Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, on Sunday, also described it as part of a pattern during his interview on CBS' "Face the Nation."  Though the comments were not aired on CBS, Cruz posted the full clip online.

"Can you image the reaction if the Bush administration had ... gone and prosecuted Michael Moore and Alec Baldwin and Sean Penn?" Cruz said. "It should trouble everyone the government uses government power and the IRS in particular to target their enemies."

D'Souza was charged with felony campaign finance violations, relating to allegations that he directed people to donate a total of $20,000 to New York Republican Senate candidate Wendy Long, and then reimbursed them.

His lawyer claimed there was no "quid pro quo" at play, "nor was there even any knowledge by the candidate that campaign finance rules may have been violated."

Federal officials, though, described the alleged violations as serious.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement that the office and FBI take a "zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process."

"If, as alleged, the defendant directed others to make contributions to a Senate campaign and reimbursed them, that is a serious violation of federal campaign finance laws," he said in a statement.

Prosecutors occasionally bring federal campaign finance cases against donors and politicians, from both parties. Perhaps the most high-profile in recent memory was the case against former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards. He was charged with six felony counts, though he ultimately walked.

Edwards donor Pierce O'Donnell was also hit with three felony counts but pleaded guilty, in the end, to two misdemeanor charges. Nevada donor Harvey Whittemore was also convicted on felony charges for campaign finance violations last year, pertaining to contributions to Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev.

But other cases have raised questions about whether conservatives are receiving additional scrutiny.   

The New York Times reported last week that the right-leaning Hollywood group Friends of Abe has been receiving heavy scrutiny from the IRS for two years as it applies for 501(c)(3) nonprofit status. Unnamed sources told the Times they recently were hit with a "10-point request" for information on meetings with politicians. They reportedly said the IRS at one point demanded "enhanced access" to the group's website. This would have revealed the names of members, and the group did not comply.

The group's membership consists of conservative actors and other entertainment industry types. Unlike some of the groups singled out by the IRS over the last several years, Friends of Abe is seeking a status that would prohibit partisan activity.

In New Jersey, Republican Gov. Chris Christie's administration, meanwhile, is getting hit from all sides after emails surfaced showing a top aide and others were involved in controversial bridge lane closures last year. The emails indicated the closures were politically motivated, though Christie has adamantly denied any knowledge of the scheme.

Last week, the attorney representing Christie's campaign said federal prosecutors subpoenaed the campaign and a state Republican Party committee.

At the state level, accusations of targeting also emerged last week in New York. Conservative activist James O'Keefe claimed that the state Department of Labor had hit his office in Westchester County, N.Y., with demands for financial documents for months, and most recently a subpoena. He called it part of a "witch hunt."

The state Department of Labor, though, described the requests as routine, and part of a process to ensure businesses that use independent contractors classify their workers appropriately.

"In this instance, as we did in 3,500 cases last year alone, the Department of Labor sought this additional information. After receiving no response, DOL issued follow up letters and phone calls. After 6 months of not receiving a response, as a matter of protocol, DOL issued subpoenas to obtain the requested information," the department said in a statement.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/27/filmmaker-prosecution-revives-accusations-conservative-targeting/

temple_of_dis

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 886
  • togtfo
impeach obama for abuses like this

ive had enuf

dinesh for president

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Filmmaker prosecution revives accusations of conservative targeting
Published January 27, 2014
FoxNews.com

Less than a year after the IRS admitted to singling out Tea Party and other like-minded groups, federal agencies and prosecutors once again are facing accusations of going tougher on conservatives than their liberal counterparts.

In a case that riled conservative filmmakers and producers, federal prosecutors last week announced campaign finance charges against Dinesh D'Souza, the documentarian behind an anti-President Obama film released during the 2012 presidential campaign.

D'Souza pleaded not guilty on Friday, though his attorney did not outright deny that a violation of some kind may have occurred.

But colleagues rallied to D'Souza's defense, calling the decision to prosecute the case politically motivated.

"When you make a film that hits the president between the eyes and could shift an election, you become a target," conservative filmmaker Dennis Michael Lynch told Fox News, referring to D'Souza's "2016: Obama's America."

Producer Gerald Molen, in a statement to FoxNews.com, called it a "selective prosecution."

Texas Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, on Sunday, also described it as part of a pattern during his interview on CBS' "Face the Nation."  Though the comments were not aired on CBS, Cruz posted the full clip online.

"Can you image the reaction if the Bush administration had ... gone and prosecuted Michael Moore and Alec Baldwin and Sean Penn?" Cruz said. "It should trouble everyone the government uses government power and the IRS in particular to target their enemies."

D'Souza was charged with felony campaign finance violations, relating to allegations that he directed people to donate a total of $20,000 to New York Republican Senate candidate Wendy Long, and then reimbursed them.

His lawyer claimed there was no "quid pro quo" at play, "nor was there even any knowledge by the candidate that campaign finance rules may have been violated."

Federal officials, though, described the alleged violations as serious.

U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara said in a statement that the office and FBI take a "zero tolerance approach to corruption of the electoral process."

"If, as alleged, the defendant directed others to make contributions to a Senate campaign and reimbursed them, that is a serious violation of federal campaign finance laws," he said in a statement.

Prosecutors occasionally bring federal campaign finance cases against donors and politicians, from both parties. Perhaps the most high-profile in recent memory was the case against former Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards. He was charged with six felony counts, though he ultimately walked.

Edwards donor Pierce O'Donnell was also hit with three felony counts but pleaded guilty, in the end, to two misdemeanor charges. Nevada donor Harvey Whittemore was also convicted on felony charges for campaign finance violations last year, pertaining to contributions to Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev.

But other cases have raised questions about whether conservatives are receiving additional scrutiny.   

The New York Times reported last week that the right-leaning Hollywood group Friends of Abe has been receiving heavy scrutiny from the IRS for two years as it applies for 501(c)(3) nonprofit status. Unnamed sources told the Times they recently were hit with a "10-point request" for information on meetings with politicians. They reportedly said the IRS at one point demanded "enhanced access" to the group's website. This would have revealed the names of members, and the group did not comply.

The group's membership consists of conservative actors and other entertainment industry types. Unlike some of the groups singled out by the IRS over the last several years, Friends of Abe is seeking a status that would prohibit partisan activity.

In New Jersey, Republican Gov. Chris Christie's administration, meanwhile, is getting hit from all sides after emails surfaced showing a top aide and others were involved in controversial bridge lane closures last year. The emails indicated the closures were politically motivated, though Christie has adamantly denied any knowledge of the scheme.

Last week, the attorney representing Christie's campaign said federal prosecutors subpoenaed the campaign and a state Republican Party committee.

At the state level, accusations of targeting also emerged last week in New York. Conservative activist James O'Keefe claimed that the state Department of Labor had hit his office in Westchester County, N.Y., with demands for financial documents for months, and most recently a subpoena. He called it part of a "witch hunt."

The state Department of Labor, though, described the requests as routine, and part of a process to ensure businesses that use independent contractors classify their workers appropriately.

"In this instance, as we did in 3,500 cases last year alone, the Department of Labor sought this additional information. After receiving no response, DOL issued follow up letters and phone calls. After 6 months of not receiving a response, as a matter of protocol, DOL issued subpoenas to obtain the requested information," the department said in a statement.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/27/filmmaker-prosecution-revives-accusations-conservative-targeting/

what utter horseshit

D'Souza attorney isn't even denying what he did so how can anyone claim he is somehow being "targeted" for some shitty movie

BTW - the IRS "targeted" both Tea Bag groups and Democratic groups because that is what they had to do to make sure they were within the rules of 501c4 are contradict the actual law and the only groups that were denied status were Democratic groups so let's give that tired old lie a rest.