Author Topic: Rush vs The Who  (Read 1133 times)

jephrius

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 766
  • PayDay
Rush vs The Who
« on: January 27, 2014, 01:30:46 PM »
After careful analysis I've determined that Rush is the superior band. Areas of importance included vocals, songwriting,  lyrics, instrument playing. Rush beat The Who by a margin.

razzle

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 134
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2014, 02:14:40 PM »
YES! Although I love the Who too! Who are you?

dan18

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7307
  • I DID WHAT I DID BECAUSE I DO WHAT I WANT.
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2014, 03:36:46 PM »
After careful analysis I've determined that Rush is the superior band. Areas of importance included vocals, songwriting,  lyrics, instrument playing. Rush beat The Who by a margin.
bullshit the who were innovators they had it all when they came out in 1964 and when they hit the usa in 1967 thats all she wrote.
every one wanted to be THE WHO.
p

Nirvana

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5121
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2014, 03:39:03 PM »
I like eminence front.

Rush is just too crowded with Guidos and hors. The hot tubs are nice though. I just don't want to have to get dressed up to go workout

Megalodon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7699
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2014, 03:53:17 PM »
 ???

The Showstoppa

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26879
  • Call the vet, cause these pythons are sick!
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2014, 04:46:19 PM »
Both suck. 

Mr Nobody

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 40197
  • Falcon gives us new knowledge every single day.
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2014, 05:12:45 PM »
Jack King rolling over in his grave.

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #7 on: January 27, 2014, 05:39:19 PM »
Shitty comparison and different types of music.

Abacab

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 336
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #8 on: January 27, 2014, 05:48:09 PM »
Shitty comparison and different types of music.

This.

I like them both..

Rush = technical virtuosity and epic tales sung poorly. Minimal/no soul to the music, and chicks don't dig it
The Who = powerful & clean rock. Great vocalists and more soul to the sound. Chicks dig 'em more than Rush

Branchs Ears

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 494
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #9 on: January 27, 2014, 06:25:06 PM »
Rush fans have always cracked me up.
To hear them tell it Rush invented music.

thebrink

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2014, 06:44:37 PM »
Rush fans have always cracked me up.
To hear them tell it Rush invented music.

They were "unique"

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21286
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2014, 06:57:37 PM »
Zep.

phil mcgroin

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 524
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #12 on: January 27, 2014, 07:10:44 PM »
Both bands suck.That being said I would give it to rush at least they have one person that can play,the drummer.though he isn't the best, he's good.Nobody else in either group is worth a shit.I'm serious.not trolling.

wild willie

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5642
Re: Rush vs The Who
« Reply #13 on: January 27, 2014, 08:25:42 PM »
After careful analysis I've determined that Rush is the superior band. Areas of importance included vocals, songwriting,  lyrics, instrument playing. Rush beat The Who by a margin.
imho......they are both tens in my book! excellent music!