Bill Nye is about to Destroy Creationist Ken Ham- Live Link

[galeniko]

we found the missing link...

this makes me think of something...

haha maybe adonis is the missing link

evolution is serious business,it explains everything, just not the bigbang

oh btw how does evolution explain cancer?thats def a mutation, but whats the purpose?

[Radical Plato]

uhm no the bigbang is not explained, not how it starteted and what trigered it.


and the missing link is still missing.


hope this helps

The only gap is the few inches between your ears.  The Big Bang Theory has been explained and the laws of nature triggered it.  Hope this helps.

[galeniko]

The only gap is the few inches between your ears.  The Big Bang Theory has been explained and the laws of nature triggered it.  Hope this helps.

nah the very beginning of bigbang are not explained.

and what was before, thats what im talking about.

out of what did it happen.

this is not explained by anyone.

[Wolfox]

uhm no the bigbang is not explained, not how it starteted and what trigered it.


and the missing link is still missing.


hope this helps

The big bang theory is explained in great detail. However the theory doesn't deal with what or how it 'started'. It simple explains the conditions and expansion of our universe a long time ago.

Just curious, are you are practicing Muslim?

[Radical Plato]

nah the very beginning of bigbang are not explained.

and what was before, thats what im talking about.

out of what did it happen.

this is not explained by anyone.

What are you talking about 'BEFORE'?  Simply asking such a question divulges your naivety and misunderstanding of the whole theory.  Time STARTED at the BIG BANG, there was no BEFORE !!!

Like Hawkins said "It’s like asking directions to the edge of the earth; The Earth is a sphere; it doesn't have an edge; so looking for it is a futile exercise."

[galeniko]

What are you talking about 'BEFORE'?  Simply asking such a question divulges your naivety and misunderstanding of the whole theory.  Time STARTED at the BIG BANG, there was no BEFORE !!!

ima ware of that.

still doesnt explain what triggered time to come to being.

and the very first milliseconds post big bang arent explained either.

you know what i mean by "before", i account the factor that time as we know it only became to be with the bigbang,im not that daft,dont worry.

but what triggered this?

you know full well that this has not been explained.

and what about black holes, they arent exaclty explained either.whats evolutions stance on that.

The big bang theory is explained in great detail. However the theory doesn't deal with what or how it 'started'. It simple explains the conditions and expansion of our universe a long time ago.

Just curious, are you are practicing Muslim?

hell no im not religious at all.

[Radical Plato]

ima ware of that.

still doesnt explain what triggered time to come to being.

and the very first milliseconds post big bang arent explained either.

you know what i mean by "before", i account the factor that time as we know it only became to be with the bigbang,im not that daft,dont worry.

but what triggered this?

you know full well that this has not been explained.

and what about black holes, they arent exaclty explained either.whats evolutions stance on that.
hell no im not religious at all.

The trigger was the Laws of Nature, possibly Gravity. The question you should be asking is who created the laws of Nature responsible for such an occurrence.  The initial conditions have been compared to that of a black hole, where strange things happen, like time slowing and even stopping and light being unable to escape.  

[The Ugly]

Hawking recently suggested black holes probably don't exist afterall.

[galeniko]

The trigger was the Laws of Nature, possibly Gravity. The question you should be asking is who created the laws of Nature responsible for such an occurrence.  The initial conditions have been compared to that of a black hole, where strange things happen, like time slowing and even stopping and light being unable to escape.  

now you said something stupid.

how you know gravity existed before time?haha

think about this question for a while

[Radical Plato]

Hawking recently suggested black holes probably don't exist afterall.

No he didn't, he suggested the notion that black holes have an event horizon, which prevents anything from escaping ever, is wrong.

[The Ugly]

No he didn't, he suggested the notion that black holes have an event horizon, which prevents anything from escaping ever, is wrong.

True, my mistake.

[galeniko]

No he didn't, he suggested the notion that black holes have an event horizon, which prevents anything from escaping ever, is wrong.

well that has been proven worng inded.i keep up with this stuff, finding it interesting.

btw haha@you "explanation" law of nature.

whats the defintion of law of nature?


and uuuhm, the gravity before time was good too.

is that all you got?

[Radical Plato]

well that has been proven worng inded.i keep up with this stuff, finding it interesting.

btw haha@you "explanation" law of nature.

whats the defintion of law of nature?


and uuuhm, the gravity before time was good too.

is that all you got?

A law of nature is a fixed law, like the speed of light, of the effect of gravity.  Something that can be verified consistently over and over again.  The infinitely dense singularity that preceded the big bang has been compared to conditions of a blackhole, meaning TIME has STOPPED or NO TIME and immense GRAVITATIONAL FORCES.  Gravity and time are independent of one another under such conditions.  Such immense gravity is the property of an infinitely dense mass and not due to time.

[RagingBull]

If you had one redeeming quality about you it would somewhat validate atheism.  You are so far from being enlightened that with or without religion you are a lost and insignificant soul.

[Roger Bacon]

If you had one redeeming quality about you it would somewhat validate atheism.  You are so far from being enlightened that with or without religion you are a lost and insignificant soul.

I'll take any number of getbig's Christians over psychotic E-kul.

I hope he isn't a good representation of Atheism as a whole.

[Coach is Back!]

I love it that evolutionists and atheists are so threatened they need to start threads and protest out the blue. Haha. True nut jobs at best. lol.

[Radical Plato]

I'll take any number of getbig's Christians over psychotic E-kul.

I hope he isn't a good representation of Atheism as a whole.

I actually consider myself an agnostic. I don't believe humanities puny brains are capable of unlocking the mysteries of the universe.

All I know is Religion and Fairy Tales about Creators are bogus and not intellectually satisfying.  They are simply psychological creations to appease the moronic anxious masses.

[James28]

It's stupid, MANY more people use to be religious and the world was a much better place to live.

Religion is necessary to keep lots of people in line and acting right.  I don't know why it frustrates some people so much.

Welcome to human nature, we won't evolve past this in the foreseeable future.

We won't evolve past our Sky Gods and magic.

I know, to my great regret, I know. People are just too stupid and unable to let go the grip on their magic book.

[SF1900]

I love it that evolutionists and atheists are so threatened they need to start threads and protest out the blue. Haha. True nut jobs at best. lol.

Theory of evolution is A LOT more credible than creationism. Evolution destroys creationism in every sense of the word.

By the way, evolution and creationism are mutually exclusive. Not too sure why you would bring them up in the same sentence.

[The True Adonis]

this makes me think of something...

haha maybe adonis is the missing link

evolution is serious business,it explains everything, just not the bigbang

oh btw how does evolution explain cancer?thats def a mutation, but whats the purpose?

Cancer is irrelevant as it usually strikes at an advanced age or well past sexual maturity and by then there was enough time for genes to be spread (successful procreation) among organisms, so its not really a pressure as far as survival of a species is concerned. Remember, evolution is really concerned with the spreading and propagation of DNA, the selfish gene.  Genes don`t care if you have AIDS or Cancer or Bad Galeniko inferior kidneys. There isn`t a "purpose" for it, its a cause an effect thing, in this case an error in cell replication due to many factors- genetics/environment/behavior.  

[James28]

I love it that evolutionists and atheists are so threatened they need to start threads and protest out the blue. Haha. True nut jobs at best. lol.

A magical invisible spirit said, 'let there be light and earth' and everything appeared, as if by magic?

[hp31]

If the solar system was brought about by an accidental collision, then the appearance of organic life on this planet was also an accident, and the whole evolution of Man was an accident too. If so, then all our present thoughts are mere accidents - the accidental by-product of the movement of atoms. And this holds for the thoughts of the materialists and astronomers as well as for anyone else's. But if their thoughts - i.e., Materialism and Astronomy - are mere accidental by-products, why should we believe them to be true? I see no reason for believing that one accident should be able to give me a correct account of all the other accidents. It's like expecting the accidental shape taken by the splash when you upset a milk-jug should give you a correct account of how the jug was made and why it was upset.

-C.S. Lewis

[James28]

ima ware of that.

still doesnt explain what triggered time to come to being.

and the very first milliseconds post big bang arent explained either.

you know what i mean by "before", i account the factor that time as we know it only became to be with the bigbang,im not that daft,dont worry.

but what triggered this?

you know full well that this has not been explained.

and what about black holes, they arent exaclty explained either.whats evolutions stance on that.

The difference is, evolutionists doesn't claim to know EVERYTHING nor should it be taken as an enditement if the answer isn't clear yet. That's what science is for and you're asking questions that's not yet known but being worked on.

Do think a 'big bang' occurred? I don't know, maybe, maybe not. But what I do know is that it's not an invisible magic being from a young religion that whispered a few words and everything instantaneously appeared. What a ridiculous cop out for a simple unthinking people. An easy answer they cling on to as it takes little effort to understand.

And excuse me, I find it hard pressed to believe what any religious organization claims when they try and cover up blatant pedophilia and the rape of young children.

[Coach is Back!]

We won't evolve past our Sky Gods and magic.

I know, to my great regret, I know. People are just too stupid and unable to let go the grip on their magic book.

Lol

[Coach is Back!]

Theory of evolution is A LOT more credible than creationism. Evolution destroys creationism in every sense of the word.

By the way, evolution and creationism are mutually exclusive. Not too sure why you would bring them up in the same sentence.

Ok