Author Topic: New MD Cover - Team MD Rock'in The Arnold (Read 10993 times)

John is a guy that’s been around the block, people know him, some respect him you are a person that no pro would do an interview W/ or any reader would take you seriously.
Most of all your post travel on a tangent, you sound serious and have knowledge in the area then you go off on a tangent elsewhere... I'm not disallowing that you don't get paid to write what you write on here but making the previous statements you need to realize that people remember "statements, actions, ect..." therefore cannot take you seriously even if it becomes an editorial job....

Do you see what I'm getting @?

No disrespect to you as a person but I just wanted 2 call out how your statements came to be understood. (to me @ least.)

Rudee · « **Reply #40 on:** January 13, 2006, 12:51:42 PM »

Rather ugly cover IMHO.

Jr. Yates · « **Reply #41 on:** January 13, 2006, 02:30:05 PM »

now way

timfogarty · « **Reply #42 on:** January 13, 2006, 03:03:21 PM »

Quote from: Cool Black Clyde on January 12, 2006, 11:39:20 AM

Damn, that's a mess. They really need an art director at that rag. Can't imagine that attracting any new readers on a newsstand.

I agree. Looks like ADD.

what I don't understand is the amount of block text that is put on covers today. I would think that the purpose of text on the cover is to get you interested in reading what's inside. but when there is so much text, or when it takes up so much of the cover, it becomes a blur and none of it catches your eye.

just once why not try a retro cover? circa early 1980s. full body shot of a bodybuilder posing on the beach (I don't understand the concept of a pic of a bodybuilder posing wearing a t-shirt or tanktop, or a pic so up close that you only see one bodypart) with minimum text, say 1/5 of what's on current covers.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #43 on:** January 13, 2006, 04:17:30 PM »

actually the cover is too busy and incomplete.
it's cheap like all the figures are pasted from old pics
and i dont like the placement of the torso's
the figures are too glossy and appear greasy.
i regret to tell you this cover sucks

Mars · « **Reply #44 on:** January 14, 2006, 04:12:52 AM »

People say it's a cool cover but it's just a collection of pics put together, all in another tint haha.

Lee_a_priest · « **Reply #45 on:** January 14, 2006, 05:36:56 AM »

Fuck you people will find anything to bitch about

.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #46 on:** January 14, 2006, 07:25:14 AM »

Quote from: Lee_a_priest on January 14, 2006, 05:36:56 AM

f**k you people will find anything to bitch about .

i am a judge afterall

240 is Back · « **Reply #47 on:** January 14, 2006, 11:49:21 AM »

Quote from: Lee_a_priest on January 14, 2006, 05:36:56 AM

f**k you people will find anything to bitch about .

Lee, you should visit www.KentuckyFriedCruelty .com

You'll really appreciate the hard work that slaughterhouse employees go thru to bring you that dinner.

dknole · « **Reply #48 on:** January 14, 2006, 05:54:34 PM »

I love the cover and MD in general. Dudes, unless you have your own international magazine and the money to put up to publish it, shut up with the wise-ass comments.

240 is Back · « **Reply #49 on:** January 14, 2006, 07:10:07 PM »

Quote from: dknole on January 14, 2006, 05:54:34 PM

I love the cover and MD in general. Dudes, unless you have your own international magazine and the money to put up to publish it, shut up with the wise-ass comments.

LMAO... so Belchman will post a cover here... and we're only allowed to give POSITIVE feedback?

So if someone posts a Kamali pic, we can't criticize him unless we have pro cards?

And if we agree or disagree with the war in Iraq, we can't say it until we are elected President?

And if we don't enjoy receiving anal sex, we can't say so unless our name is dknole?

Come on, dude...