Wait is over….
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/engineering/architecture/4278874
Just read it...it basically just repeats the standard official line. Some things i still find interesting; one, they say the fuel tank at the bottom-often touted as the reason for the collapse-did not actually explode. Two, they confirmed that it was supposedly the fires from 'burning office debris', and not from any other fuel source, that caused the collapse. This is interesting because this is not supposed to happen, where fire fueled by common office debris can burn hot enough to affect the steel structure-and indeed, they admitted that this was the first time in history that a modern skyscraper has collapsed from office fires alone. This is interesting because there have been may cases of modern skyscrapers enduring extensive office fires engulfing many floors, for much longer durations of time, and collapse was never even a possibility. Also, many of the other building around wtc 7 showed more extensive damage than it did from 'falling burning debris', and had similar office fires going, but none of them collapsed. Lastly, the article claims there is no evidence of hearing blasts by witnesses or recorded audio, when in fact there is substantial numbers of witnesses who did report hearing such sounds, even firemen.
So basically we have a building confirmed to house tons of sensitive government information, collapse suddenly neatly into its own footprint, supposedly from office fires alone, for the first time in history, defying not only history but the expectations of the ngineers who design such structures. Meanwhile, all the surrounding buildings, also damaged with debris and fires, remain standing, as modern buildings have always done in such circumstances.
I do not pretend to be an expert on this subject nor am insinuating some vast government plot designed by george bush
But clearly there is something fishy here.
