Author Topic: If we took the top 6 from last years Mr O and sent them back in time 10 years (Read 19196 times)

Prime · « **on:** January 17, 2006, 01:42:36 PM »

How would they do against the top 6 of 1995?

Prime · « **Reply #1 on:** January 17, 2006, 01:50:24 PM »

These pic's arent all from 1995, if anyone has direct contest pics put em up

Hendrix · « **Reply #2 on:** January 17, 2006, 04:45:39 PM »

With the exception of Ronster and Cutler they would be put to shame by Flex,Shawn,Dorian,Nasser,Kevin.

tony b · « **Reply #3 on:** January 17, 2006, 04:49:28 PM »

IMO

Reorder

1. Ronnie
2. Yates
3. Cutler
4. Levrone
5. Ray
6. Nasser
7. Taylor
8. Cormier
9. Gunter
10. Gustavo
11. Victor

Jr. Yates · « **Reply #4 on:** January 17, 2006, 04:50:44 PM »

yea i donno...thats though to say all those guys are like the sports best.

Palpatine Q · « **Reply #5 on:** January 17, 2006, 04:54:58 PM »

Quote from: tony b on January 17, 2006, 04:49:28 PM

IMO

Reorder

1. Ronnie
2. Yates
3. Cutler
4. Levrone
5. Ray
6. Nasser
7. Taylor
8. Cormier
9. Gunter
10. Gustavo
11. Victor

I agree except i would drop Cutler to the 6 spot. I think Kevin has nearly as much mass and is far superior in every other aspect. And while Shawn gives up a lot of size, he had more detail in one pec than Cutler has in his whole body.

Jr. Yates · « **Reply #6 on:** January 17, 2006, 04:58:52 PM »

i think thats a pretty accurate line up.

phyxsius · « **Reply #7 on:** January 17, 2006, 06:56:42 PM »

Damn, Chris looked so gay

HRDCOR · « **Reply #8 on:** January 17, 2006, 06:59:12 PM »

Yates and laverone and Ronnie would have been top 3, the rest would have looked squat next to them !!

Hulkster · « **Reply #9 on:** January 17, 2006, 08:39:54 PM »

I think Ronnie version 2005 would do pretty well, only because he had a more streamlined midection this year. If you had picked the 2004 line up (with Rhul in the top 6, Ronnie and Jay holding tons o'water etc) they would have been crushed by the lineup in the mid 90's (except for Dorian of course, after all, he was post tear then

)

tony b · « **Reply #10 on:** January 17, 2006, 08:53:14 PM »

Quote from: Groink on January 17, 2006, 04:54:58 PM

I agree except i would drop Cutler to the 6 spot. I think Kevin has nearly as much mass and is far superior in every other aspect. And while Shawn gives up a lot of size, he had more detail in one pec than Cutler has in his whole body.

yeah good point

blaster · « **Reply #11 on:** January 17, 2006, 09:11:04 PM »

I think the '95 boys would do better. Smaller waists, more muscular looking.

Flex wheeler '99 best ever.

Cavalier22 · « **Reply #12 on:** January 17, 2006, 09:48:07 PM »

thats a lot of egos on one stage

Hulkster · « **Reply #13 on:** January 17, 2006, 09:56:15 PM »

from 95 or 96:

I don't think a post-tear Yates would do that well.

1993 Yates would do well, but not a post 1993 version.

240 is Back · « **Reply #14 on:** January 17, 2006, 10:09:01 PM »

Who would win in a battle... the 1810 Napolean or Sun Tzu ala 400 BCE?

cauthon · « **Reply #15 on:** January 17, 2006, 10:16:07 PM »

Sun Tzu

240 is Back · « **Reply #16 on:** January 17, 2006, 10:18:40 PM »

Quote from: cauthon on January 17, 2006, 10:16:07 PM

Sun Tzu

i kept that book in the bathroom and read it for quite a few weeks.

There is enough bacteria in that book to encompass yin and yang, cold and heat, and the constraints of the seasons.

healthiswealth · « **Reply #17 on:** January 17, 2006, 11:27:10 PM »

decent standings. But you guys forgot flex. Like him or not, he is undoubtly in the top 10.

tony b · « **Reply #18 on:** January 18, 2006, 01:01:32 AM »

Quote from: healthiswealth on January 17, 2006, 11:27:10 PM

decent standings. But you guys forgot flex. Like him or not, he is undoubtly in the top 10.

Slip him in above Nasser

phyxsius · « **Reply #19 on:** January 18, 2006, 02:57:36 AM »

Quote from: Hulkster on January 17, 2006, 09:56:15 PM

from 95 or 96:

I don't think a post-tear Yates would do that well.

1993 Yates would do well, but not a post 1993 version.

monster biceps

WiseGuy · « **Reply #20 on:** January 18, 2006, 06:28:13 AM »

Quote from: Prime on January 17, 2006, 01:42:36 PM

How would they do against the top 6 of 1995?

prime this is a great idea...lets name 3 judges here on get big and do a prejudge and posedown and come up with a winner....

we could do different years other than this one as well

Prime · « **Reply #21 on:** January 18, 2006, 06:45:10 AM »

Quote from: healthiswealth on January 17, 2006, 11:27:10 PM

decent standings. But you guys forgot flex. Like him or not, he is undoubtly in the top 10.

I said top 6 Flex was not in the top 6 in 1995.

Prime · « **Reply #22 on:** January 18, 2006, 06:46:12 AM »

Quote from: WiseGuy on January 18, 2006, 06:28:13 AM

prime this is a great idea...lets name 3 judges here on get big and do a prejudge and posedown and come up with a winner....

we could do different years other than this one as well

Be my guest, sounds like alot of work.

aliamini · « **Reply #23 on:** January 18, 2006, 06:46:37 AM »

I don’t think Gunter and Victor would even be close to the 95 Top 6

Lets say 2005 top 6 at their best Vs. 95 top 6 at their best:

1st and 2nd: Dorian and Ronnie depending on what the judges want
3rd & 4th: Gustavo and Kevin
5th: Jay
6th: Nasser
7th: Shawn
8th: Chris
9th: Vince

Then again judging depends on what the judges are use to see (type of physiques)

It was different each year depending on the line up … 1 year they liked Shawn and Labrada’s Physique and the next they wanted Kevin and Nasser … so u never know what the judges are looking for …

Plus the earlier era (early and mid 90) the Bodybuilders were much leaner and harder … now I don’t know if it was the lighting, tanning, photography or simply some drugs were available and legit that time that are not now a days. So there days we have more mass but lack hardness … more muscularity but lack definition.

bigdumbbell · « **Reply #24 on:** January 18, 2006, 07:16:03 AM »

Quote from: phyxsius on January 17, 2006, 06:56:42 PM

Damn, Chris looked so gay

do you want some of that now ?