Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
September 20, 2014, 11:27:52 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: (Arizona Gov.) Brewer vetoes gun bills  (Read 325 times)
240 is Back
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 83320


Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


WWW
« on: April 22, 2014, 10:11:22 PM »

This is what the PEOPLE want.  She vetoed it.  This is what their state HOUSE, which they elected, voted on and passed.   Brewer has been quite the liberal in the last few months, overriding the will of the people.  


She's horrible on gun rights.  It's all about HER power - not what the people want.



Source: Arizona Daily Star

Arizonans will not be allowed bring their guns into public buildings, at least not this year.

Gov. Jan Brewer this afternoon vetoed HB 2339 which would have allowed those who have a state-issued permit to carry a concealed weapon to ignore a "no guns" sign posted at the door. The only way a government agency could keep out all weapons would have been to install metal detectors and place armed guards at each public entrance.

Separately, Brewer vetoed legislation to add more teeth to existing laws that pre-empt the right of cities to enact their own gun laws.

HB 2517 would have required a court to assess a fine of up to $5,000 against any elected or appointed government official, or the head of any administrative agency, if there is a knowing and willful enactment of a local gun law that exceeds the restrictions permitted by the state.

Read more: http://azstarnet.com/news/state-and-regional/brewer-vetoes-gun-bills/article_b1477cc4-ca7a-11e3-bd05-001a4bcf887a.html
Report to moderator   Logged

JOHN MATRIX
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 12429


Dems have nothing but Emotion and the Race Card


« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2014, 08:51:08 AM »

Thats unusual..
Report to moderator   Logged
Vince G, CSN MFT
Competitors II
Getbig V
******
Gender: Male
Posts: 14341



WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2014, 06:41:08 AM »

This is what the PEOPLE want.  She vetoed it.  This is what their state HOUSE, which they elected, voted on and passed.   Brewer has been quite the liberal in the last few months, overriding the will of the people.  


She's horrible on gun rights.  It's all about HER power - not what the people want.



Source: Arizona Daily Star

Arizonans will not be allowed bring their guns into public buildings, at least not this year.

Gov. Jan Brewer this afternoon vetoed HB 2339 which would have allowed those who have a state-issued permit to carry a concealed weapon to ignore a "no guns" sign posted at the door. The only way a government agency could keep out all weapons would have been to install metal detectors and place armed guards at each public entrance.

Separately, Brewer vetoed legislation to add more teeth to existing laws that pre-empt the right of cities to enact their own gun laws.

HB 2517 would have required a court to assess a fine of up to $5,000 against any elected or appointed government official, or the head of any administrative agency, if there is a knowing and willful enactment of a local gun law that exceeds the restrictions permitted by the state.

Read more: http://azstarnet.com/news/state-and-regional/brewer-vetoes-gun-bills/article_b1477cc4-ca7a-11e3-bd05-001a4bcf887a.html


Good for her.  If a business has a "No Guns Allowed" sign....then people should respect that shit.
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Archer77
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11542

Team Shizzo


« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2014, 06:49:50 AM »

Good call.  The owner of the property should have the right to decide whether guns are permitted on their property
Report to moderator   Logged

A
240 is Back
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 83320


Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2014, 07:49:51 AM »

Good call.  The owner of the property should have the right to decide whether guns are permitted on their property

Does everyone agree with this?   A landlord should be able to say "No guns allowed" by tenants?  A restaurant should be able to say "No guns allowed in my place"?   Punishable by law?
Report to moderator   Logged

Archer77
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11542

Team Shizzo


« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2014, 08:00:49 AM »

Does everyone agree with this?   A landlord should be able to say "No guns allowed" by tenants?  A restaurant should be able to say "No guns allowed in my place"?   Punishable by law?

It's tricky.   I would argue that a gun ban should not apply to a place of residency. 
Report to moderator   Logged

A
240 is Back
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 83320


Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 24, 2014, 08:19:48 AM »

It's tricky.   I would argue that a gun ban should not apply to a place of residency. 

Conservatives would have a FIT if somehow, people who disobeyed a Walmart or Mom & Pop grocery sign saying "No guns allowed", who carried anyway - were given 5 years in prison. 
Report to moderator   Logged

Vince G, CSN MFT
Competitors II
Getbig V
******
Gender: Male
Posts: 14341



WWW
« Reply #7 on: April 24, 2014, 08:31:58 AM »

It's tricky.   I would argue that a gun ban should not apply to a place of residency. 


That's the landlord's right because it affects his business if someone gets hurt or killed
Report to moderator   Logged

A
240 is Back
Getbig V
*****
Posts: 83320


Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com


WWW
« Reply #8 on: April 24, 2014, 08:43:11 AM »

see, strict consititionalists would probably say "NO NO NO, you CANNOT just RESTRICT certain amendments because you disagree with them!"

We've had that argument here many times.  it's a tough one.  Imagine if you rented a property to someone, and they chose to wear Nazi stuff and have hitler dolls and hold "legal" rallies on the property.  You'd want them OUT, even if that violated their 1st amendment rights.  On the other hand, if your landlord just decided out of the blue "no guns on this property, or you have to move", suddenly most of us wouldn't support the ability to strip away the 2nd amendment. 

Tricky one.
Report to moderator   Logged

headhuntersix
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 15672

Our forefathers would be shooting by now


« Reply #9 on: April 24, 2014, 08:58:56 AM »

"Shall not be infringed"...as long as you have a permit....have at it.

240 her second law appears to be ok. State law is the final law....you can't decide to make the law worse...as I read it. I have no problem with that.
Report to moderator   Logged

L
Archer77
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11542

Team Shizzo


« Reply #10 on: April 24, 2014, 10:16:05 AM »


That's the landlord's right because it affects his business if someone gets hurt or killed

Its someone's home and they still have the right to privacy.
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Vince G, CSN MFT
Competitors II
Getbig V
******
Gender: Male
Posts: 14341



WWW
« Reply #11 on: April 24, 2014, 10:23:50 AM »

Its someone's home and they still have the right to privacy.


If you have a landlord, you don't own the property....you rent.  The owner has the right to decide what he or she wants on their property....a renter doesn't
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Archer77
Getbig V
*****
Gender: Male
Posts: 11542

Team Shizzo


« Reply #12 on: April 24, 2014, 10:38:57 AM »


If you have a landlord, you don't own the property....you rent.  The owner has the right to decide what he or she wants on their property....a renter doesn't

Its your personal domicile.   We aren't even talking about the same thing.  Youre saying landlords have the right to ban handguns which at least in Michigan isnt up for dispute.  Im arguing that tenants should have the right to legally own a hand gun. 
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Vince G, CSN MFT
Competitors II
Getbig V
******
Gender: Male
Posts: 14341



WWW
« Reply #13 on: April 24, 2014, 10:58:21 AM »

Its your personal domicile.   We aren't even talking about the same thing.  Youre saying landlords have the right to ban handguns which at least in Michigan isnt up for dispute.  Im arguing that tenants should have the right to legally own a hand gun. 

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJ79nNquQ0c" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JJ79nNquQ0c</a>
Report to moderator   Logged

A
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Theme created by Egad Community. Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!