Are UFOs real ?

[OzmO]

So perhaps you'd like to explain your belief, then.

Already have.

Have you not been following the thread for the last few pages?

Have you been keeping up?

[Jack T. Cross]

Donny seems to be just like you.  Runs away from questions.  Next he will be displaying flawed logic and poor reading comprehension. 

Still haven't seen too many CT'ers or people who believe in UFO's who can make a good argument. 

Do you include yourself in this? Because I think you've managed to play all sides in this thread, and your position has become very unclear.

[OzmO]

Do you include yourself in this? Because I think you've managed to play all sides in this thread, and your position has become very unclear.

You haven't made a good argument on this thread.  I don't recall you ever making a good argument on any thread. 

My position is very clear.

Have you been keeping up?   Have you been reading the last few pages of tHe thread?

[Jack T. Cross]

Fact is, all possibilities are open with respect to the subject. None of us can say otherwise, we can only tilt. So if we'll kindly acknowledge that, there will be an agreement.

[OzmO]

Fact is, all possibilities are open with respect to the subject. None of us can say otherwise, we can only tilt. So if we'll kindly acknowledge that, there will be an agreement.

Nope.   

Have you been keeping up?

Have you been reading last few pages of the thread?

[Jack T. Cross]

You haven't made a good argument on this thread.  I don't recall you ever making a good argument on any thread. 

My position is very clear.

Have you been keeping up?   Have you been reading the last few pages of tHe thread?

You're free to quote anything I've said, anywhere, and make a challenge. That's why the forum exists.

[Archer77]

If I was suggesting the possibility of several conjoined gorillas freely roaming midtown, for instance, your argument may apply.

You understand this, right?

Do you know the answers to the question I asked?  How does your statement differ from your example?

Fact is, all possibilities are open with respect to the subject. None of us can say otherwise, we can only tilt. So if we'll kindly acknowledge that, there will be an agreement.

Do you know the difference betweem facts and opinion and how they differ?  Do you know how facts are defined and derived?

[Jack T. Cross]

Do you know the answers to the question I asked?  How does your statement differ from your example?

Do you know the difference betweem facts and opinion and how they differ?  Do you know how facts are defined and derived?

If you would be so kind to apply this to the subject, it would be very helpful.

(btw: what the hell are you doing up around the clock?)

[Archer77]

If you would be so kind to apply this to the subject, it would be very helpful.

(btw: what the hell are you doing up around the clock?)

Do you know the difference between a fact and an opinion?  How are facts defined and derived.  Do you know what speculation and conjecture are?   

[Jack T. Cross]

Do you know the difference between a fact and an opinion?  How are facts defined and derived.  Do you know what speculation and conjecture are?   

All this, without a single mention of how it applies to our subject.

Any particular reason for that?

[OzmO]

You're free to quote anything I've said, anywhere, and make a challenge. That's why the forum exists.

That's  what i have been doing.   You continue to craft poor arguments.

Have you been keeping up?  

Have you been reading the last few pages of the thread?

[Archer77]

All this, without a single mention of how it applies to our subject.

Any particular reason for that?

Are you able to do as I asked.  Can you see how its relevent to the discussion?  Should you reexamine your statements?   Do you need time to do so?

[Jack T. Cross]

That's  what i have been doing.   You continue to craft poor arguments.

Have you been keeping up?  

Have you been reading the last few pages of the thread?

You can't admit when you don't have the answers. That's your problem.

So instead, you'll try to drown the thread with meaningless posts.

[Jack T. Cross]

Are you able to do as I asked.  Can you see how its relevent to the discussion?  Should you reexamine your statements?   Do you need time to do so?

The subject (of the intended discussion, at least) isn't preposterous, so you will have to explain yourself to be understood, yes.

[OzmO]

You can't admit when you don't have the answers. That's your problem.

So instead, you'll try to drown the thread with meaningless posts.

I don't have what answers?

Have you been keeping up?  

Have you been reading the last few pages of the thread?  I am starting to think "NO"

[OzmO]

The subject (of the intended discussion, at least) isn't preposterous, so you will have to explain yourself to be understood, yes.

Another example of Jack's poor reading comprehension.

[Jack T. Cross]

I don't have what answers?

Have you been keeping up?  

Have you been reading the last few pages of the thread?  I am starting to think "NO"

You don't have the answers to anything on this topic, as you are not a superhuman, and the sooner you can admit that, the closer we'll be to an agreement.

[Archer77]

The subject (of the intended discussion, at least) isn't preposterous, so you will have to explain yourself to be understood, yes.

Can you explain yourself?

[OzmO]

You don't have the answers to anything on this topic, as you are not a superhuman, and the sooner you can admit that, the closer we'll be to an agreement.

I have answered on this topic..

More proof of Jack's poor reading comprehension.

Have you been keeping up?  

Have you been reading the last few pages of the thread?

[Jack T. Cross]

I have answered on this topic..

More proof of Jack's poor reading comprehension.

Have you been keeping up?  

Have you been reading the last few pages of the thread?

Are you a chick, OzmO? (serious question)

[OzmO]

Are you a chick, OzmO? Serious question.

 

Another example of Jacks poor reading comprehension

got to go for a while.   NSA meeting 

[Jack T. Cross]

Can you explain yourself?

OK, I'll give this one last attempt, in case your intentions are honest.

You are relying on a subject to be truly absurd, if you hope to use your "ignorance" argument. Something that thoroughly counters all believability, in other words. Do you feel the subject does that?

[Jack T. Cross]

Another example of Jacks poor reading comprehension

got to go for a while.   NSA meeting  

Do you claim to be in the NSA, now, Oz?

 

[Archer77]

OK, I'll give this one last attempt, in case your intentions are honest.

You are relying on a subject to be truly absurd, if you hope to use your "ignorance" argument. Something that thoroughly counters all believability, in other words. Do you feel the subject does that?

How is this relevent to your post that I was responding directly to?  Do you remember what post that was?   How am I relying on a subject to be absurd? 

[Jack T. Cross]

How is this relevent to your post that I was responding directly to?  Do you remember what post that was?   How am I relying on a subject to be absurd? 

We can solve this very quickly, Archer. Do you feel I've made any claim that is preposterous? If yes, please quote it.