Hard to refute this by those who claim to follow "science"

[Soul Crusher]

 

[OzmO]

Too easy to refute.

Word play for ignorant religious whack-o's

"life" is not the issue.

    next...

 

[Soul Crusher]

Too easy to refute.

Word play for ignorant religious whack-o's

"life" is not the issue.

    next...

 

What is the issue? 

[OzmO]

What is the issue? 

Do you really need to ask?


If you do, google it.   

[loco]

Do you really need to ask?


If you do, google it.   

OzmO, I'm curious.  What is the issue, and what exactly am I supposed to google?

[OzmO]

OzmO, I'm curious.  What is the issue, and what exactly am I supposed to google?

I wanted to play around with SC for a bit.  But its all good.  And you know my views on the matter well.

It comes down to distinctions and details.

The image suggests a simplistic argument:  Single cell life is the same as multi-cell life in early fetuses.  Some people (scientists, pro-abortion)  will readily call single cells "life" but they will dismiss early fetuses as "life"

Here's where it falls apart:

-  Scientists and at least low educated people will all agree Cell division and early fetuses are life.
-  The issue is whether or not that's mass of cells is functioning "HUMAN LIFE" or not.  As we easily kill all kinds of other "life" (bacteria, animals, insects etc.) without a second thought.
-  Another facet to the issue is the mothers right to choose to end the pregnancy.


That's why that image appeals to ignorant religious whack-o's.

[Soul Crusher]

Im not religious at all - just saw it on FB and saw a way to get the libs to melt down

I wanted to play around with SC for a bit.  But its all good.  And you know my views on the matter well.

It comes down to distinctions and details.

The image suggests a simplistic argument:  Single cell life is the same as multi-cell life in early fetuses.  Some people (scientists, pro-abortion)  will readily call single cells "life" but they will dismiss early fetuses as "life"

Here's where it falls apart:

-  Scientists and at least low educated people will all agree Cell division and early fetuses are life.
-  The issue is whether or not that's mass of cells is functioning "HUMAN LIFE" or not.  As we easily kill all kinds of other "life" (bacteria, animals, insects etc.) without a second thought.
-  Another facet to the issue is the mothers right to choose to end the pregnancy.


That's why that image appeals to ignorant religious whack-o's.

[OzmO]

Im not religious at all - just saw it on FB and saw a way to get the libs to melt down

that's what i figured you were doing... hehehehe   

I don't think most libs on this board would bite on that one lol

[loco]

I wanted to play around with SC for a bit.  But its all good.  And you know my views on the matter well.

It comes down to distinctions and details.

The image suggests a simplistic argument:  Single cell life is the same as multi-cell life in early fetuses.  Some people (scientists, pro-abortion)  will readily call single cells "life" but they will dismiss early fetuses as "life"

Here's where it falls apart:

-  Scientists and at least low educated people will all agree Cell division and early fetuses are life.
-  The issue is whether or not that's mass of cells is functioning "HUMAN LIFE" or not.  As we easily kill all kinds of other "life" (bacteria, animals, insects etc.) without a second thought.
-  Another facet to the issue is the mothers right to choose to end the pregnancy.


That's why that image appeals to ignorant religious whack-o's.

I thought that might be what you meant, but I wasn't sure.