Weak tweeners dont win SEC defensive player of the year.
SEC is the best conference in college football.
Some say that's about the system, not the player. Look at SEC QBs in the NFL:
Alabama? No.
Auburn? Jason Campbell... and, that's it.
Arkansas? No (unless someone from before they entered the SEC did good things as a pro)
Ole Miss? Eli Manning, and that's it.
Mississippi State? Could probably eliminate the QB position from their offense and never tell the difference.
LSU? No, only mega-bust Jamarcus Russell, and never-was Tommy Hodson. Which is better than nothing, I guess.
Vanderbilt? Jay Cutler, who may have been the only Vandy QB to go pro since the Gilded Age.
South Carolina? No.
Florida? Lots of guys drafted, but Shane Matthews is the only one that ever did anything. It was brought up not to forget Rex Grossman, who miraculously helmed the position for the Bears in their 2006 run, and started a bunch of games (credit to brandon12mc for pointing out Rex).
Georgia? Matt Stafford has looked good, but cannot stay healthy at all. Aside from him though, they had plenty of guys drafted, but again, none that did anything meaningful.
Tennessee? Peyton Manning, and super draft bust Heath Shuler. None of their other drafted QBs ever reall did anything.
Kentucky? Tim Cou-nevermind, no, they haven't produced a single one.
So why is this? What is it about the SEC that makes it so prohibitive for its QBs to succeed in the NFL? Plenty of guys from every other conference have gone on to do great things.
It can't be written off as "well everyone runs the ball too much," because the SEC produced Pro Bowlers and Hall of Famers in bunches, long before the conference discovered "forward pass" in the 1990s.
http://247sports.com/Board/30/Contents/SEC-QBs-in-the-NFL-4537543