Author Topic: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own  (Read 34122 times)

Archer77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14174
  • Team Shizzo
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #125 on: June 04, 2014, 02:58:20 PM »
Archer is making a good point:  this really shouldn't be a partisan issue.  And I'm not sure it is at this point?  The fact the president broke the law and traded terrorists for a detainee is very troubling.  That's the issue, not whether Obama will be impeached, etc.  This isn't about keeping some political scorecard. 

Political score card is a perfect way to describe it.  Thanks, beach.
A

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33696
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #126 on: June 04, 2014, 03:16:45 PM »
Again, your dumbass is missing the point entirely. Its not about the GOP.  Thats all you can think about.  I suppose thats your way of disassociating yourself from the issue.

I really don't see Dems whining over these issues to this extent.

If this is such a big issue, and the others before it.  Impeach him.  Oh... you can't because the GOP is a bunch of pansy waists who are scared to take the black man on. 

Everything is a political scorecard.  If you don't think it is, you are either naive or stupid.  Continue on though... in a couple weeks this will be on the back burner and a new scandal will be out.  For Obama to shove down your throat and you sit there and take it just like the rest of the little party.

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21287
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #127 on: June 04, 2014, 03:34:38 PM »
Archer is making a good point:  this really shouldn't be a partisan issue.  And I'm not sure it is at this point?  The fact the president broke the law and traded terrorists for a detainee is very troubling.  That's the issue, not whether Obama will be impeached, etc.  This isn't about keeping some political scorecard. 

Agreed. Everyone should be troubled by this.

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #128 on: June 04, 2014, 03:34:53 PM »
I really don't see Dems whining over these issues to this extent.

If this is such a big issue, and the others before it.  Impeach him.  Oh... you can't because the GOP is a bunch of pansy waists who are scared to take the black man on. 

Everything is a political scorecard.  If you don't think it is, you are either naive or stupid.  Continue on though... in a couple weeks this will be on the back burner and a new scandal will be out.  For Obama to shove down your throat and you sit there and take it just like the rest of the little party.

Yes of course, let Obama set a precedent with all this shit, then you 'll be screaming when a rep does the same thing. You are missing the point that as an American you should be pissed of over what has happened over the GWB admin and now the Obama admin. Little by little the rule of law means less and less. I guess it won't matter to you until there is a drone buzzing your house with a hellfire, because for some reason you have been classified as a domestic terrorist
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #129 on: June 04, 2014, 03:43:18 PM »
That's the issue, not whether Obama will be impeached, etc.  This isn't about keeping some political scorecard. 

ANY prez that does this should be impeached.   Not just dems or repubs. 

Skip8282

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7004
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #130 on: June 05, 2014, 04:24:14 PM »
Archer is making a good point:  this really shouldn't be a partisan issue.  And I'm not sure it is at this point?  The fact the president broke the law and traded terrorists for a detainee is very troubling.  That's the issue, not whether Obama will be impeached, etc.  This isn't about keeping some political scorecard. 


Agreed, this wouldn't constitute a 'high crime' by any measure.  But, the Congress would need to be united in the message they are sending, and we have to consider the micromanagement aspect over the Executive's duties....I'm not too big on that.


I was reading that this guy had gone on a walk-about twice before and came back.  It's getting really muddy as to whether or not he's a defector or an idiot.


Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66458
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #131 on: June 05, 2014, 04:35:24 PM »

Agreed, this wouldn't constitute a 'high crime' by any measure.  But, the Congress would need to be united in the message they are sending, and we have to consider the micromanagement aspect over the Executive's duties....I'm not too big on that.


I was reading that this guy had gone on a walk-about twice before and came back.  It's getting really muddy as to whether or not he's a defector or an idiot.



I don't like what I've been hearing at all.  He is definitely an idiot, but it is also looking pretty clear that he wasn't captured. 

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #132 on: June 05, 2014, 05:24:59 PM »
I don't like what I've been hearing at all.  He is definitely an idiot, but it is also looking pretty clear that he wasn't captured. 

really

nothing I've read says that he wasn't

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/bowe-bergdahl-released/taliban-commanders-say-they-found-bergdahl-cursing-his-countrymen-n123846

The Taliban found Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl walking alone, acting abnormally and cursing his countrymen before they captured him in Afghanistan in 2009, two men who were Taliban commanders at the time told NBC News on Thursday.

They said that Afghan locals first informed fighters about the soldier, and then the fighters rushed to capture him.

“Our people at the time couldn’t understand his language, but it was after he was shifted to a safe location, he said he wasn’t happy with his countrymen, but he didn’t intend to convert to Islam or join mujahideen (holy warriors),” one of the commanders said.

The commanders said that Taliban officers first thought it was a trick — perhaps an American soldier sent out alone to spy on the enemy.

“As we never saw their soldier patrolling alone … we would ask him how he managed to walk out of his base,” one of the commanders said. “He would tell us that it was personal issue.”

The descriptions filled in some of the details about the capture of Bergdahl, who was held by the Taliban for five years before he was released to U.S. forces. In exchange, five Taliban operatives were freed from the American prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

One of the two commanders quit the Taliban fighting U.S. forces in 2010. He joined another faction that is working to find a negotiated political solution to the Afghan conflict. He is now living in the United Arab Emirates.

The second of the two commanders is based in Helmand province in Afghanistan.

The commander who left in 2010 said that, at least through that time, Bergdahl did not convert to Islam.

“Think he had deserted his army with a mission and wanted to accept Islam, but our people didn’t trust him. That shattered his belief,” he said.

In the initial hours after Bergdahl was reported missing, on June 30, 2009, the United States mounted a furious search operation to find him. It included armed drones, teams of dogs, raids on suspected enemy hideouts and F-15 fighter jets for air cover.

The Taliban officials would not say where they took Bergdahl immediately after the capture, only that it was a safe location.

Later, according to Taliban sources, he was taken to the South Waziristan region of Pakistan. Later he was shifted to the forested, mountainous area of Shawal Valley, also in Pakistan.

Bergdahl was returned to American forces over the weekend and is recovering at an American military hospital in Germany. He was promoted twice in captivity and holds the rank of sergeant.

The trade for the five Taliban at Guantanamo has drawn outrage, primarily from Republicans. Former members of Bergdahl’s platoon have described him as a deserter who walked away from his outpost.

In addition, members of Congress have faulted the Obama administration — even suggesting that it broke the law — for failing to notify Congress before it executed the trade.

The administration has argued that it had to move quickly because Bergdahl’s health was deteriorating quickly.

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #133 on: June 05, 2014, 07:02:30 PM »
really

nothing I've read says that he wasn't

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/bowe-bergdahl-released/taliban-commanders-say-they-found-bergdahl-cursing-his-countrymen-n123846

The Taliban found Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl walking alone, acting abnormally and cursing his countrymen before they captured him in Afghanistan in 2009, two men who were Taliban commanders at the time told NBC News on Thursday.

They said that Afghan locals first informed fighters about the soldier, and then the fighters rushed to capture him.

“Our people at the time couldn’t understand his language, but it was after he was shifted to a safe location, he said he wasn’t happy with his countrymen, but he didn’t intend to convert to Islam or join mujahideen (holy warriors),” one of the commanders said.

The commanders said that Taliban officers first thought it was a trick — perhaps an American soldier sent out alone to spy on the enemy.

“As we never saw their soldier patrolling alone … we would ask him how he managed to walk out of his base,” one of the commanders said. “He would tell us that it was personal issue.”

The descriptions filled in some of the details about the capture of Bergdahl, who was held by the Taliban for five years before he was released to U.S. forces. In exchange, five Taliban operatives were freed from the American prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

One of the two commanders quit the Taliban fighting U.S. forces in 2010. He joined another faction that is working to find a negotiated political solution to the Afghan conflict. He is now living in the United Arab Emirates.

The second of the two commanders is based in Helmand province in Afghanistan.

The commander who left in 2010 said that, at least through that time, Bergdahl did not convert to Islam.

“Think he had deserted his army with a mission and wanted to accept Islam, but our people didn’t trust him. That shattered his belief,” he said.

In the initial hours after Bergdahl was reported missing, on June 30, 2009, the United States mounted a furious search operation to find him. It included armed drones, teams of dogs, raids on suspected enemy hideouts and F-15 fighter jets for air cover.

The Taliban officials would not say where they took Bergdahl immediately after the capture, only that it was a safe location.

Later, according to Taliban sources, he was taken to the South Waziristan region of Pakistan. Later he was shifted to the forested, mountainous area of Shawal Valley, also in Pakistan.

Bergdahl was returned to American forces over the weekend and is recovering at an American military hospital in Germany. He was promoted twice in captivity and holds the rank of sergeant.

The trade for the five Taliban at Guantanamo has drawn outrage, primarily from Republicans. Former members of Bergdahl’s platoon have described him as a deserter who walked away from his outpost.

In addition, members of Congress have faulted the Obama administration — even suggesting that it broke the law — for failing to notify Congress before it executed the trade.

The administration has argued that it had to move quickly because Bergdahl’s health was deteriorating quickly.

Perhaps you should look harder
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #134 on: June 05, 2014, 07:06:52 PM »
He was found....by the Taliban...he knew what he was doing. No idea for what purpose.....me thinks he has a bit of the retard. He was also a hadji lover. There were more then a few....
L

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6799
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #135 on: June 05, 2014, 07:13:29 PM »
He was found....by the Taliban...he knew what he was doing. No idea for what purpose.....me thinks he has a bit of the retard. He was also a hadji lover. There were more then a few....

People act like this jagoff is some kind of hero  ::), this shit head deserted his post, wandered off the FOB in A-stan unarmed. Last time I checked you can't just fucking pack your shit up and join the enemy without committing treason. If anyone deserved a drone strike it was this fuck head
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

The Ugly

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 21287
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #136 on: June 05, 2014, 07:19:55 PM »
really

nothing I've read says that he wasn't

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/bowe-bergdahl-released/taliban-commanders-say-they-found-bergdahl-cursing-his-countrymen-n123846

The Taliban found Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl walking alone, acting abnormally and cursing his countrymen before they captured him in Afghanistan in 2009, two men who were Taliban commanders at the time told NBC News on Thursday.

They said that Afghan locals first informed fighters about the soldier, and then the fighters rushed to capture him.

“Our people at the time couldn’t understand his language, but it was after he was shifted to a safe location, he said he wasn’t happy with his countrymen, but he didn’t intend to convert to Islam or join mujahideen (holy warriors),” one of the commanders said.

The commanders said that Taliban officers first thought it was a trick — perhaps an American soldier sent out alone to spy on the enemy.

“As we never saw their soldier patrolling alone … we would ask him how he managed to walk out of his base,” one of the commanders said. “He would tell us that it was personal issue.”

The descriptions filled in some of the details about the capture of Bergdahl, who was held by the Taliban for five years before he was released to U.S. forces. In exchange, five Taliban operatives were freed from the American prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

One of the two commanders quit the Taliban fighting U.S. forces in 2010. He joined another faction that is working to find a negotiated political solution to the Afghan conflict. He is now living in the United Arab Emirates.

The second of the two commanders is based in Helmand province in Afghanistan.

The commander who left in 2010 said that, at least through that time, Bergdahl did not convert to Islam.

“Think he had deserted his army with a mission and wanted to accept Islam, but our people didn’t trust him. That shattered his belief,” he said.

In the initial hours after Bergdahl was reported missing, on June 30, 2009, the United States mounted a furious search operation to find him. It included armed drones, teams of dogs, raids on suspected enemy hideouts and F-15 fighter jets for air cover.

The Taliban officials would not say where they took Bergdahl immediately after the capture, only that it was a safe location.

Later, according to Taliban sources, he was taken to the South Waziristan region of Pakistan. Later he was shifted to the forested, mountainous area of Shawal Valley, also in Pakistan.

Bergdahl was returned to American forces over the weekend and is recovering at an American military hospital in Germany. He was promoted twice in captivity and holds the rank of sergeant.

The trade for the five Taliban at Guantanamo has drawn outrage, primarily from Republicans. Former members of Bergdahl’s platoon have described him as a deserter who walked away from his outpost.

In addition, members of Congress have faulted the Obama administration — even suggesting that it broke the law — for failing to notify Congress before it executed the trade.

The administration has argued that it had to move quickly because Bergdahl’s health was deteriorating quickly.

So what's your take on this, Straw? His fellow soldiers, etc. are lying?

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #137 on: June 05, 2014, 07:37:36 PM »
Perhaps you should look harder

feel free to post a link

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #138 on: June 05, 2014, 07:39:53 PM »
He was found....by the Taliban...he knew what he was doing. No idea for what purpose.....me thinks he has a bit of the retard. He was also a hadji lover. There were more then a few....

he would have to be a retard to want to be captured by the Taliban

from what I've read it sounds like he was just an idiot who thought he could wander around the countryside

Skip posted that he had done this twice before and if that's the case then he probably thought he could do it again and this time his luck ran out

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.

dario73

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6467
  • Getbig!
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #140 on: June 06, 2014, 05:25:08 AM »
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/06/exclusive-bergdahl-declared-jihad-secret-documents-show



Fuck you libfags

Let's see straw boy's attempt to spin this in order to defend his personal savior Hussein Obama.

Donny

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18335
  • getbig Zen Master
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #141 on: June 06, 2014, 05:36:52 AM »
he would have to be a retard to want to be captured by the Taliban

from what I've read it sounds like he was just an idiot who thought he could wander around the countryside

Skip posted that he had done this twice before and if that's the case then he probably thought he could do it again and this time his luck ran out
No Soldier just wanders around the countryside, not on active Service. If he was caught doing this twice before then why was he still out there? surly a high risk to his comrades. i would not trust a wanker like this to cover my back. I don´t know about the US Army but the British Army would have removed him from duty. I am sure most guys in his unit wanted rid of him. Can´t blame the troops, they knew he was a waste of space. Muslim loving Kunt.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #142 on: June 06, 2014, 09:00:23 AM »

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #143 on: June 06, 2014, 09:02:31 AM »
No Soldier just wanders around the countryside, not on active Service. If he was caught doing this twice before then why was he still out there? surly a high risk to his comrades. i would not trust a wanker like this to cover my back. I don´t know about the US Army but the British Army would have removed him from duty. I am sure most guys in his unit wanted rid of him. Can´t blame the troops, they knew he was a waste of space. Muslim loving Kunt.

well I guess you of all people would know since you were with him at the time
I'm just repeating what Skip wrote in an earlier post

One thing I know for sure is that every poster on this board (except for one person) is just repeating the crap they hear in the media and there is no doubt that a lot of it will turn out to be false or greatly lacking in accurate details


headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #144 on: June 06, 2014, 09:05:40 AM »
No Soldier just wanders around the countryside, not on active Service. If he was caught doing this twice before then why was he still out there? surly a high risk to his comrades. i would not trust a wanker like this to cover my back. I don´t know about the US Army but the British Army would have removed him from duty. I am sure most guys in his unit wanted rid of him. Can´t blame the troops, they knew he was a waste of space. Muslim loving Kunt.

He was supposed to have done this atleast once. I'm reading between the lines but I think he wasn't going outside the wire anymore but had him doing bullshit details. As a leader I would have had him on the next bird smoking outa there...HOWEVER...I suspect the leadership had things like sandbag repair and other shit and figured they would get the shitbird to do it..what's the worst that could happen. I bet the DUSTWUN call that went into their battalion had to really suck to make.
L

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41759
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #145 on: June 06, 2014, 09:06:21 AM »
hey dipshit

are you ever going to learn to read the articles before you post them?

Everything so far from. Imam Obama has been a lie

Donny

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18335
  • getbig Zen Master
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #146 on: June 06, 2014, 09:06:42 AM »
well I guess you of all people would know since you were with him at the time
I'm just repeating what Skip wrote in an earlier post

One thing I know for sure is that every poster on this board (except for one person) is just repeating the crap they hear in the media and there is no doubt that a lot of it will turn out to be false or greatly lacking in accurate details


I was on active Service and i know this is not, never known.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41012
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #147 on: June 06, 2014, 09:12:19 AM »
I was on active Service and i know this is not, never known.

yet from multiple reports that appears to be exactly what he did

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66458
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #148 on: June 06, 2014, 09:17:21 AM »
EXCLUSIVE: Bergdahl declared jihad in captivity, secret documents show
By James Rosen
Published June 05, 2014FoxNews.com

U.S. Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl at one point during his captivity converted to Islam, fraternized openly with his captors and declared himself a "mujahid," or warrior for Islam, according to secret documents prepared on the basis of a purported eyewitness account and obtained by Fox News.

The reports indicate that Bergdahl's relations with his Haqqani captors morphed over time, from periods of hostility, where he was treated very much like a hostage, to periods where, as one source told Fox News, "he became much more of an accepted fellow" than is popularly understood. He even reportedly was allowed to carry a gun at times.

The documents show that Bergdahl at one point escaped his captors for five days and was kept, upon his re-capture, in a metal cage, like an animal. In addition, the reports detail discussions of prisoner swaps and other attempts at a negotiated resolution to the case that appear to have commenced as early as the fall of 2009.

The reports are rich in on-the-ground detail -- including the names and locations of the Haqqani commanders who ran the 200-man rotation used to guard the Idaho native -- and present the most detailed view yet of what Bergdahl's life over the past five years has been like. These real-time dispatches were generated by the Eclipse Group, a shadowy private firm of former intelligence officers and operatives that has subcontracted with the Defense Department and prominent corporations to deliver granular intelligence on terrorist activities and other security-related topics, often from challenging environments in far-flung corners of the globe.

The group is run by Duane R. ("Dewey") Clarridge, a former senior operations officer for the Central Intelligence Agency in the 1980s best known for having been indicted for lying to Congress about his role in the tangled set of events that became known as the Iran-Contra scandal. He was pardoned by the first President Bush in December 1992 while on trial.

Clarridge counts a number of achievements in his spy career as well, including a prominent role in the establishment of a national counterrorism center at CIA, a move widely copied around the world by foreign intelligence agencies. A New York Times profile of Clarridge published in January 2011 disclosed the contractual relationship Eclipse had with the Pentagon, through subcontractors, and reported further that Clarridge's activities had included efforts to help find Bergdahl.

Clarridge told Fox News his group enjoyed a subcontract through the assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict from November 2009 through May 31, 2010, and that after the contract was terminated, he invested some $50,000 of his own money to maintain the elaborate network of informants and handlers that had yielded such detailed accounts of Bergdahl's status.

Clarridge further told Fox News that by the end of 2010, he had furnished at least 13 of these detailed SITREPs, or situation reports, that his network generated about Bergdahl to Brig. Gen. Robert P. Ashley Jr., who in April 2010 was named director of intelligence, at the J-2 level, at U.S. Central Command, or CENTCOM, headquartered at MacDill Air Force Base in Florida.

Clarridge said Eclipse SITREP # 3023, dated Aug. 23, 2012 -- in which a member of the Haqqani network, said to be close to Bergdahl's captors, reported that the American prisoner had declared himself a "mujahid" -- was among the reports provided to Ashley.

The latter is now commanding general at the U.S. Army Intelligence Center of Excellence and Fort Huachuca, where a message left with the public affairs office was not immediately returned.

The documents obtained by Fox News show that Eclipse developed and transmitted numerous status reports on the whereabouts of the errant American soldier, spanning a period from October 2009, roughly three months after Bergdahl reportedly walked off his base in Afghanistan and fell into custody of the Haqqani network, up through August 2012.

At one point -- in late June 2010, after Bergdahl succeeded in one of his escape attempts -- the Haqqani commanders constructed a special metal cage for him, and confined him to it. At other points, however, Bergdahl was reported to be happily playing soccer with the Haqqani fighters, taking part in AK-47 target practice and being permitted to carry a firearm of his own, laughing frequently and proclaiming "Salaam," the Arabic word for "peace."

Reached by telephone, retired U.S. Marine Corps Gen. James N. Mattis, a 45-year service veteran who served as CENTCOM commander from August 2010 to August 2012, told Fox News he may have received bits and pieces of the intelligence generated by Eclipse, but said Ashley, with whom he maintained a close working relationship, had not forwarded on to him the specific SITREPs cited by Fox News.

Mattis was also adamant that no one at CENTCOM or within the broader U.S. military or intelligence community -- despite intensive investigation of such allegations -- ever learned of anything to suggest Bergdahl had evolved into an active collaborator with the Haqqani network or the Taliban. "We were always looking for actionable intelligence," Mattis said. "It wasn't just the IC [intelligence community]. We had tactical units that were involved in the fight. We had SIGINT. Any collaborators who were on the other side and who came over to our side. We kept an eye on this. ... There was never any evidence of collaboration."

Fox News reported on Monday that Bergdahl was the subject of a "major classified file" prepared by the U.S. intelligence community, and that many members of that community harbored concerns that Bergdahl, during his period of captivity, may have engaged in collaboration with the enemy.

Experts consulted by Fox News said that SITREP # 3023 presents a picture of an American captive who, if not an active collaborator, may have succumbed to Stockholm Syndrome -- the dynamic by which hostages can become enamored of their captors and join their cause -- or simply feigned allegiance in order to survive. The report cited a source new to Eclipse -- a member of the Haqqani network said to be close to Mullah Sangeen, the Haqqani commander charged at all points over the last five years with operational custody and control of Bergdahl -- whose trustworthiness had not been fully vetted by the group. However, the report stated, the informant "does have plausible access to the information reported below, and claims to have seen Bergdahl personally in Shawal," in North Waziristan.

"In the early stages Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl's captivity," the report states, "he was held at Palasin, Naurak, FATA [Federally Administered Tribal Areas], under the control of Mullah Sangeen and under the direct supervision of Haji Mursaleem, Sangeen's father. Conditions and locality changed after Mursaleem died [in September 2010], and Bergdahl was kept under tight guard after his attempted escape from his new place of detention in Shawal.

"As of August 2012," the report continues, "the person with responsibility for Bergdahl's captivity is Sangeen's brother, who has delegated the actual guarding of Bergdahl to Abubakr Asadkhel, a Burra Khel Wazir loyal to Sangeen, and whose sub-tribe lives in Shawal. Abubakr leads approximately 200 armed men from his tribe and operates from five bases (markaz) in Shawal. ... Abubakr's tribe is one of the prosperous branches of the Wazir and owns lots of trucks. Abubakr circulates his prisoner between schools in the area he controls, and his different insurgent bases."

Conditions for Bergdahl have greatly relaxed since the time of the escape. Bergdahl has converted to Islam and now describes himself as a mujahid. Bergdahl enjoys a modicum of freedom, and engages in target practice with the local mujahedeen, firing AK47s. Bergdahl is even allowed to carry a loaded gun on occasion. Bergdahl plays soccer with his guards and bounds around the pitch like a mad man. He appears to be well and happy, and has a noticeable habit of laughing frequently and saying 'Salaam' repeatedly.

At other points, the SITREPs depict a much nastier relationship between Bergdahl and his captors. In July 2010, Eclipse SITREPs based on confidential talks with Afghan Taliban commanders reported that "the original command structure for the responsibility of holding the captured soldier remains intact."

Overall responsibility for the captive is in the hands of Haqqani commander Sangeen, with Bandiwan, one of his deputies, responsible for making the detailed arrangements. There are two locations where the soldier is kept: one in Degan and the other in Shawal, North Waziristan. When in Degan he is kept in the compound of Eid Wale, a local Dawr who is close to Sangeen and is a chromite dealer. The other location is at Shawal. The [source] confirmed that the soldier had been missing for five days and when he was recovered, he was a little worse from wear (lack of food; a bit slimmer) but otherwise in good health.

But an earlier dispatch stated that after his re-capture, on or about June 22, 2010, Bergdahl was "in ill-health, and has been collapsing."A SITREP dated one week before Bergdahl's ill-fated escape attempt placed him in the Bazaar area of Miramshah, and noted that "he seemed not to be tightly controlled."

The Eclipse reports suggest that negotiations over Bergdahl's fate began within a few months after his capture. An October 2009 SITREP disclosed that Sirajuddin Haqqani, the Pashtun warlord controlling the broader network that bears his name, had reached out through Pakistani political contacts to propose a prisoner swap. A July 2010 SITREP stated that two months prior, in late May, "negotiations between the Haqqani and representatives of the missing US soldier collapsed." At that point, the report said, Bergdahl was moved to a more secure location.

The New York Times, in its 2011 profile of Clarridge, described his agents' dispatches as "an amalgam of fact, rumor, analysis and uncorroborated reports." The fabled ex-spook made the more than one dozen SITREPs that Eclipse prepared on the Bergdahl case -- all previously unpublished -- available to Fox News because he wanted to demonstrate, as he put it: "We know what we're talking about."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/06/05/exclusive-bergdahl-declared-jihad-secret-documents-show/

Donny

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18335
  • getbig Zen Master
Re: Trading Terrorists for One of Our Own
« Reply #149 on: June 06, 2014, 09:21:45 AM »
yet from multiple reports that appears to be exactly what he did
Well don´t you think that his walk arounds were not for a reason? Meeting the enemy? intelligence?..