I am playing fair. I'm being more fair and honest than the makers of the graph because I don't have an agenda. The graph becomes meaningless because the makers of the graph are trying to associate numbers that may not have much relation to each other as it concerns the conclusion being drawn.
The intent of the graph is to conflate the issue and lead the reader to the exact conclusion you came to.
The implication being pushed in the graph is that there is an injustice and rapists are not receiving justice at the rate at which they are committing rape. There is no evidence for this.
A common mistake people make when looking at these types of graphs is to extrapolate unnecessarily and make conclusions the information does not support. You see this most frequently with crimes stats. Because a particular group are incarcerated at a higher rate there must be injustice. Rarely do they bother to research further.
Unreported rapes are essentially hearsay and shouldn't even be listed because they can't be substantiated. It's essentially one persons word against another. I can accuse anyone of anything but that doesn't mean there is any truth to the allegation. The graph also gives no information as to why a portion of reported rapes did not go to trial. The reader is left to conclude the reason is something other than the innocence of the accused.
Falsely accused is another unclear term. I would imagine that many individuals accused of rape never go to trial because of mitigating circumstance such as lack of evidence or the authorities doubt the claim of the accuser. How does one determine a rape allegation is false. Does this require a trial, an admission from the accuser or the prosecution not pursuing charges?
Holy fuck, really?
There is no evidence that substantiates the claim that rapists are not "receiving justice" at the same rate as their committing rapes? Holy shit, what do you call evidence? I guess you think most women are, what?, exaggerating? Or maybe your definition of "rape" is extremely narrow? Be nice for you to explain here.
Direct questions here, then.
Do you think most rapes go unreported or not?
Do you think that sometimes women will try to accuse a guy of rape (by making the allegation to a 3rd party) when the sex was consensual or not?
Do you think the frequency of those two situations above are comparable (as in close to the same number of occurrences) or not?
Look, like you sort of said, any kind of he said/she said situation (that isn't recorded on video) cannot really be substantiated 100% can it? I can understand why this might mean that it's impossible to prosecute all rapists, but you seem to be saying more that this; You seem to be saying that this means that it's doubtful that any rape took place. And this is seems to be at odds with what the common consensus.
Last question: Of the women that you know IRL, do their ideas differ much from yours when it comes to the supposed incidence of unreported rapes?