Author Topic: Towns fighting back against the illegal invaders (Read 5673 times)

dario73 · « **on:** June 17, 2014, 05:41:52 AM »

The incompetent federal government is not going to do anything to solve the illegal immigration problem. It is going to take every town to push back against the dictatorship and demand that these criminals are not brought to their backyards.

The Obama administration Monday abruptly halted plans to shelter some of the children surging across the border at a defunct college in rural Virginia, as the White House has continued to see its efforts to house the children throughout the country be thwarted by opposition from local officials.

As many as 500 children were to start arriving this week at St. Paul’s College, a recently closed historically black college in Lawrenceville, Virginia. But the Health and Human Services Department’s plans were stymied, at least temporarily, after town and county officials objected to the short notice and complete lack of community input.

As the feds worked over the weekend preparing the campus for the arrival of the children, whom officials said would be ages 11 to 17, public outrage erupted in the community, which is about 70 miles south of Richmond.

Letters flooded the town council offices, including from nearby residents threatening to boycott the town if the college became a way station for illegal immigrant youths.

Rep. Robert Hurt, the Republican congressman who represents the region, sent a letter to HHS Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell on Monday morning demanding she halt the project. After the delay was announced, Mr. Hurt said it should be the beginning of a total rethink.

“I would request that they completely halt the implementation of this plan and return to the drawing board,” he said in a statement. “If the HHS plan is indeed good for the people of Lawrenceville and Brunswick County, then they should begin with a transparent and open process that includes the community and the local elected officials every step of the way and ensures compliance with all local, state and federal laws — including the local zoning ordinances of the town of Lawrenceville.”

Plans to house some of the children at an empty office complex in Baltimore were halted after the city’s Democratic mayor and Maryland’s two Democratic senators objected as soon as the details were announced.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/16/residents-force-feds-to-scrap-plan-to-house-illega/?page=1#ixzz34tqcSn6Q
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

dario73 · « **Reply #1 on:** June 17, 2014, 05:44:12 AM »

“The first major concern is the safety and security of the citizens of Lawrenceville and Brunswick County,” Mr. Jones said.

Jerry Prince, the owner of Prince’s Barber Shop in Lawrenceville, said that he wanted what was best for the children, but he feared the children would bring diseases to his town.

“Even kids carry diseases like smallpox, chickenpox and scabies,” said Mr. Prince, 40.

The fears may not be unfounded.

Immigration officials have said many of the children have never seen a doctor until they are intercepted by agents at the border, and head lice and scabies screenings are part of the initial checks.

Indeed, one early hiccup in the government’s efforts to find places to house the children was that the military, which offered housing on several bases, refused to let the children onto bases until seven days had elapsed from the time doctors had administered inoculations.

On Monday, Rep. Candice S. Miller, Michigan Republican and chairwoman of a key border security subcommittee, wrote a letter asking Mr. Obama to deploy the National Guard to take up some of those duties and let the agents get back to their job of stopping illegal immigrants, drug smugglers and gun traffickers.

“This diversion away from normal patrol responsibilities will result in an increase of drugs and migrants illicitly crossing our border,” she said.

She called on the president to not only deploy the Guard but to give it police powers so it could also aid in patrolling the border and arresting illegal immigrants.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/16/residents-force-feds-to-scrap-plan-to-house-illega/?page=2#ixzz34trEbe3l
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

dario73 · « **Reply #2 on:** June 17, 2014, 06:13:09 AM »

These criminals don't seem concerned about their "plight" or worried that they are causing a "humanitarian crisis". Some are so relaxed that the only thing they have on their minds is sex.

Border Patrol agents have been taken off patrol duties to perform what they call “baby-sitting.” Agents say they are doing everything from changing diapers to trying to separate boys and girls getting frisky in detention centers.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/16/residents-force-feds-to-scrap-plan-to-house-illega/?page=2#ixzz34txYfJUt
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #3 on:** June 17, 2014, 06:34:31 AM »

O-fag is doing this imtentionally to collapse the system

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #4 on:** June 17, 2014, 07:36:24 AM »

Quote from: Cholo4Life on June 17, 2014, 06:48:23 AM

Agreed! And then he's going to use this "crisis" to insist that Congress pass a law extending his term of office indefinitely. I think Jose Serrano (D-NY) will be introducing the legislation. Then, martial law will be imposed, our guns will be taken away, and we will all be forced into same sex marriages with illegal aliens from Mexico. When are people going to wake up this and do something about it?

I used to laugh about this stuff too..until it became clear it was starting to move in this direction. Do i think he will declare martial law and become dictator? No, thats stupid stuff. But obama has made it clear that he is an extremist,and he fully intends to 'fundamentally transform' this nation, just like he said he would.
The way this administration is acting with the immigration thing is straight up criminal and treasonous. How can anyone possibly argue otherwise??

Soul Crusher · « **Reply #5 on:** June 17, 2014, 08:33:57 AM »

Quote from: Cholo4Life on June 17, 2014, 08:32:41 AM

You're blaming Obama? We've had more or less open borders since the Reagan administration. The whole ethnic character of the country has changed irreversibly because of it. Bush II spent 8 years worrying about the border integrity of Iraq while that of the US was flouted on a daily basis. It's silly to blame Obama. He'll be gone in 2 years and regardless of who takes his place nothing will change. Like I've said before, the people who matter want cheap labor.

Jorge Arbusto El Segundo was as bad as it gets on this

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #6 on:** June 17, 2014, 08:44:03 AM »

Quote from: Cholo4Life on June 17, 2014, 08:32:41 AM

You're blaming Obama? We've had more or less open borders since the Reagan administration. The whole ethnic character of the country has changed irreversibly because of it. Bush II spent 8 years worrying about the border integrity of Iraq while that of the US was flouted on a daily basis. It's silly to blame Obama. He'll be gone in 2 years and regardless of who takes his place nothing will change. Like I've said before, the people who matter want cheap labor.

Yes bush was bad at this too...what does that have to do with Obama, today?
For as bad as it was during the bush years its even more serious now as the numbers just keep increasing...and the amnesty they want now will dwarf anything in american history, and will be a deadly serious blow to this nation.

RRKore · « **Reply #7 on:** June 17, 2014, 08:54:06 AM »

Quote from: JOHN MATRIX on June 17, 2014, 08:44:03 AM

Yes bush was bad at this too...what does that have to do with Obama, today?
For as bad as it was during the bush years its even more serious now as the numbers just keep increasing...and the amnesty they want now will dwarf anything in american history, and will be a deadly serious blow to this nation.

I'm not sure if you know what you're talking about or are just in "henny penny the sky is falling mode". Can you help me out here?

So, a "deadly serious blow to this nation"? Can you describe the "deadly serious blow"?

And explain how its effects will compare with what you consider to be other "deadly serious blows"?

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #8 on:** June 17, 2014, 11:02:16 AM »

Quote from: RRKore on June 17, 2014, 08:54:06 AM

I'm not sure if you know what you're talking about or are just in "henny penny the sky is falling mode". Can you help me out here?

So, a "deadly serious blow to this nation"? Can you describe the "deadly serious blow"?

And explain how its effects will compare with what you consider to be other "deadly serious blows"?

It would take pages upon pages to answer that lol..what part of the country do you live in? Those of us on the border states can see the writing on the wall already. For starters, the united states was founded and designed by a 'certain group' of people. For most of its history, 90% of its immigrants came from Europe. This 'group of people' created and maintained a nation that was so much the envy of the world, that every other 'group of people' was clamoring to get in, because their own 'groups' created nations that were mostly complete, perpetual failures. Now, our president wants to bring in and open the gates to 15-30 million people not from europe, but from the third world. These 'groups of people' have never built or maintained a nation anywhere close to americas level. They are mostly shitholes. Yet these are the people who will become the new Majority over the next few decades, esp since they have got the message now that 'americas doors are open, vaminos!!!!'.

The people who founded, designed, and maintained the nation that all wanted to live in, will be a shrinking minority, while those who have only known third world banana republics will take over the ship.

You can figure out what happens from there.

RRKore · « **Reply #9 on:** June 17, 2014, 11:37:52 AM »

Quote from: JOHN MATRIX on June 17, 2014, 11:02:16 AM

It would take pages upon pages to answer that lol..what part of the country do you live in? Those of us on the border states can see the writing on the wall already. For starters, the united states was founded and designed by a 'certain group' of people. For most of its history, 90% of its immigrants came from Europe. This 'group of people' created and maintained a nation that was so much the envy of the world, that every other 'group of people' was clamoring to get in, because their own 'groups' created nations that were mostly complete, perpetual failures. Now, our president wants to bring in and open the gates to 15-30 million people not from europe, but from the third world. These 'groups of people' have never built or maintained a nation anywhere close to americas level. They are mostly shitholes. Yet these are the people who will become the new Majority over the next few decades, esp since they have got the message now that 'americas doors are open, vaminos!!!!'.

The people who founded, designed, and maintained the nation that all wanted to live in, will be a shrinking minority, while those who have only known third world banana republics will take over the ship.

You can figure out what happens from there.

California. Ye' old Inland Empire. It ain't right on the border but close enough, wouldn't ya say?

Real question here: Are you trolling?

Because it seems that in order to go along with your thinking, I've got to subscribe to the notion that one's capabilities are inexorably tied to one's race, right? To which I say, LOL and give me a break. Hey, if you're gonna subscribe to nutty notions and you're not just trolling, why not work phrenology into the mix? Who is to say that one's head shape is not one's destiny, right? lol

Anyway, it was silly of me to expect that you might respond logically by, say, presenting some sort of fact-based economic argument about the advisability of supporting an unskilled immigrant population of a certain size given the current economic condition of the USA.

I didn't realize you were just a bigot. Oh well, my bad.

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #10 on:** June 17, 2014, 11:42:35 AM »

Facts cant be racist dude. Name one latin american country that isnt a third world nation. That is the path we are heading towards. 'Fundamentally change' america indeed.

RRKore · « **Reply #11 on:** June 17, 2014, 12:36:59 PM »

Quote from: JOHN MATRIX on June 17, 2014, 11:42:35 AM

Facts cant be racist dude. Name one latin american country that isnt a third world nation. That is the path we are heading towards. 'Fundamentally change' america indeed.

Uh, I'm a little worried that you don't really know the meaning of "1st world", "2nd world", and "3rd world" as applied to countries. (Google tells me that those are out-dated terms that haven't been used much since the '90's.)

If you're talking about economic development, however, then the Latin American countries of Chile, Argentina, and Brazil are all wealthy countries that are considered "developed".

It doesn't matter, though, actually. All people, even freakin' Aborigines*, can be successfully assimilated into modern culture.

Recently on Reddit, I came across these pics of village life in the Solomon Islands which were submitted by a girl who is now in law school in Australia:

Full set of pics here:
http://imgur.com/a/ex9V6

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #12 on:** June 17, 2014, 12:47:31 PM »

Of course there are quality, competent individuals in every race. The difference is the ratios; i could point out lots of brilliant black people, but that doesnt change the fact that virtually every black run nation in the world, in history in fact, has been a disaster. Sure there are bright spots in latin america...but the fact is none of them are even close to the wealth, standard of living, or world power status as america, or even the european powers.
bottom line is, you cannot 'fundamentally change' the united states, flood it with (mostly all) 3rd world dregs to the point where in many areas they do not need to assimilate at all since they ARE the majority language/culture, and expect nothing to change.
No country in history has ever experienced a rapid displacing of its native population and survived.

RRKore · « **Reply #13 on:** June 17, 2014, 01:16:15 PM »

Quote from: JOHN MATRIX on June 17, 2014, 12:47:31 PM

Of course there are quality, competent individuals in every race. The difference is the ratios; i could point out lots of brilliant black people, but that doesnt change the fact that virtually every black run nation in the world, in history in fact, has been a disaster. Sure there are bright spots in latin america...but the fact is none of them are even close to the wealth, standard of living, or world power status as america, or even the european powers.
bottom line is, you cannot 'fundamentally change' the united states, flood it with (mostly all) 3rd world dregs to the point where in many areas they do not need to assimilate at all since they ARE the majority language/culture, and expect nothing to change.
No country in history has ever experienced a rapid displacing of its native population and survived.

Ah, ok. So what method are you using to determine the countries of the good immigrants and the bad ones?

And, holy DNA-analysis, how are you lumping all folks from Latin America together?

Even this guy isn't doing that, lol:

JM, you're talking out your ass, brother. Change might be scary but it doesn't need to be bad.

You are not being "displaced", lol. If you don't want to feel that way, though, why not just learn some Spanish and make some new friends? What's so difficult about that? (Seems like half the freakin' language is made up of English cognates anyway.)

BTW, what do you call "surviving"? And when you say "country", do you mean "national government"?

dario73 · « **Reply #14 on:** June 18, 2014, 05:14:59 AM »

The Virginia county that ignited a national debate by using local police to round up illegal immigrants is planning a new legal maneuver to force the U.S. government to divulge what it did with the more than 7,000 people turned over to deportation authorities.

Corey Stewart, the chairman of the Prince William County Board of Supervisors, told The Washington Times that about 10 percent of those it originally turned over to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement over the last seven years have been re-arrested by county police for new crimes after they were released.

We know that’s just the tip of the iceberg,” Mr. Stewart said, citing examples such as a man who was convicted of killing a Roman Catholic nun in a drunken driving accident while he was awaiting action on possible deportation.

Mr. Stewart plans to take the first step toward possible litigation against federal officials on Tuesday by asking his colleagues on the county board to authorize a Freedom of Information Act request to demand that the Department of Homeland Security divulge how many of the suspected illegal immigrants that county police arrested since 2007 were deported, released or kept in detention.

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/16/virginia-county-renews-push-for-deportation-data-o/#ixzz34zaJzIzW
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/16/virginia-county-renews-push-for-deportation-data-o/#ixzz34zaB3Psg
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

flipper5470 · « **Reply #15 on:** June 18, 2014, 05:44:06 AM »

Brazil is about as developed as present day Detroit...shit...they're worried about the 2016 Olympic sailing events because the site designated for the event is essentially a public toilet with lumps of fecal matter and dead bodies floating all over the place.

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/olympics/2014/05/19/sailing-official-wants-rio-water-pollution-tests/9272755/

Vince G, CSN MFT · « **Reply #16 on:** June 18, 2014, 05:58:22 AM »

Quote from: RRKore on June 17, 2014, 12:36:59 PM

Uh, I'm a little worried that you don't really know the meaning of "1st world", "2nd world", and "3rd world" as applied to countries. (Google tells me that those are out-dated terms that haven't been used much since the '90's.)

If you're talking about economic development, however, then the Latin American countries of Chile, Argentina, and Brazil are all wealthy countries that are considered "developed".

It doesn't matter, though, actually. All people, even freakin' Aborigines*, can be successfully assimilated into modern culture.

Recently on Reddit, I came across these pics of village life in the Solomon Islands which were submitted by a girl who is now in law school in Australia:

Full set of pics here:
http://imgur.com/a/ex9V6

Yea, there's really no such thing. Those folks are living the simple life by pure choice and quite honestly look what they are doing. They just hunt or goof around all day....no bills to pay, no mortgage, plenty of fresh food "LITERALLY". Its not about quantity...its about quality. They seem pretty happy and content to me

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #17 on:** June 18, 2014, 06:30:05 AM »

Retardario claims to be a guest of our country here. Yet when asked multiple times, he refuses to address this. Surely he can't be embarrassed about being a hypocrite and posting nonsense about other immigrants here could he?

dario73 · « **Reply #18 on:** June 18, 2014, 06:46:10 AM »

How is Dario a guest when he is a citizen by obeying all immigration laws and getting his citizenship legally.

It has been 20 years since that day.

It takes a moron like lurkerTHEFAGGOT to not be able to distinguish between legal and illegal immigration. No one is more stupid than lurkerTHELIMPWRISTEDOBAMANUTSUCKER.

When does a guest invade a country by illegally crossing that country's borders? That is a bastardization of the word "guest". A guest has to be invited, permitted. A guest doesn't force his way in.

HEHEHEHEHEH!! The mask has come off from the faces of these open-border libtards.

headhuntersix · « **Reply #19 on:** June 18, 2014, 08:05:10 AM »

Quote from: JOHN MATRIX on June 17, 2014, 11:42:35 AM

Facts cant be racist dude. Name one latin american country that isnt a third world nation. That is the path we are heading towards. 'Fundamentally change' america indeed.

Don't let these Libs off the hook. Name a country...because in the last year I've been to almost all of them. They're all shitholes. All of them.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #20 on:** June 18, 2014, 08:28:45 AM »

Quote from: dario73 on June 18, 2014, 06:46:10 AM

How is Dario a guest when he is a citizen by obeying all immigration laws and getting his citizenship legally.

It has been 20 years since that day.

It takes a moron like lurkerTHEFAGGOT to not be able to distinguish between legal and illegal immigration. No one is more stupid than lurkerTHELIMPWRISTEDOBAMANUTSUCKER.

When does a guest invade a country by illegally crossing that country's borders? That is a bastardization of the word "guest". A guest has to be invited, permitted. A guest doesn't force his way in.

HEHEHEHEHEH!! The mask has come off from the faces of these open-border libtards.

Someone said you made the claim you were a guest. Not me. Learn to read immigrant. So again... what shithole of a country are you from? We already know from your posting that it is a subpar education one.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #21 on:** June 18, 2014, 09:52:18 AM »

Quote from: Cholo4Life on June 18, 2014, 09:48:18 AM

LOL at all of the anti-immigration dudes. U matter as much to the people who run shit as the "illegal invaders." That's why we have open borders. Nobody cares what u think.

Even their own party doesn't anymore.

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #22 on:** June 19, 2014, 07:51:34 AM »

You guys are free to applaud and support the decline of the country if thats what you want to do. If its too much to ask-can you tell me a reason why open borders and mass amnesty for 15-30 million third world illegals will be good for america, since you guys support this? I HONESTLY want to understand this.

LurkerNoMore · « **Reply #23 on:** June 19, 2014, 08:11:00 AM »

I don't support it. I am all for keeping the undesirables out. As studies have proven, all they do is increase the crime ratio and decrease the quality of life in the areas they frequent.

JOHN MATRIX · « **Reply #24 on:** June 19, 2014, 09:30:25 AM »

Quote from: LurkerNoMore on June 19, 2014, 08:11:00 AM

I don't support it. I am all for keeping the undesirables out. As studies have proven, all they do is increase the crime ratio and decrease the quality of life in the areas they frequent.

So why are you a diehard supporter of those who are pushing this, and attack those who want to prevent this?