If someone's identity on Getbig is known and if he then boasts about having the latest underground lab and satisfied customers doesn't this sound totally insane? So what if doesn't have anything in his name.
The DEA would easily track a lab down. Since Eric isn't a dumbbell completely we have to assume something isn't right.
Lab schmab, you said DEA informant. What evidence, Vince? You just did the math in your head and figured
informant? Absolutely unreal, especially for such an educated, logical, gentleman, who relishes talking down his condescending nose to the unwashed flotsam here. All the while, lecturing everyone on morality and decency and fairness, etc.
But it bugs you when they say pedo. Yet, by your logic, the math works perfectly as well. He's got a lab, you got a camera. He's got customers, you got "models." Then the leap: You say informant, he says pedophile. Where is your higher ground, I don't get it.
"Have to assume something isn't right," you say. Any idea how ironic that sounds, with your photos, your comments about the young teen bikini competitor, the way you handled the whole Arnold/teenager thing, etc.?
You're incredible, Basile. Are you some poor kid's fucking grandpa?
