Author Topic: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce  (Read 1884 times)

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.


Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
ROFL... Global Warming Cultists get in here.  ;D
The Last Ten Years of Global Warming Never happened

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
This is called an opinion piece.

Also, many models predict this. This is from increased melting equaling more precipatation (measured) and strong winds.

http://www.washington.edu/guy-winds-explain-puzzling-growth-of-sea-ice-in-antarctica/

also, the thickness was the issue, the density has increased quite a bit. Why?
polar vortex creates convergence as warmer temperatures occur more frequently, this packs the ice together.

Also, it's why the recent cold streak in the US occured, the artic isn't like the antartic at all, one is all ice the other land with ice, hence the artic melting first. This caused the vortex diverge lowering it's cyclone, dipping into canada and the states, pushing warm wind north, hence all the record artic melting.

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
This is called an opinion piece.

Also, many models predict this. This is from increased melting equaling more precipatation (measured) and strong winds.

http://www.washington.edu/guy-winds-explain-puzzling-growth-of-sea-ice-in-antarctica/

also, the thickness was the issue, the density has increased quite a bit. Why?
polar vortex creates convergence as warmer temperatures occur more frequently, this packs the ice together.

Also, it's why the recent cold streak in the US occured, the artic isn't like the antartic at all, one is all ice the other land with ice, hence the artic melting first. This caused the vortex diverge lowering it's cyclone, dipping into canada and the states, pushing warm wind north, hence all the record artic melting.


We don't understand the earths climate nearly enough to adequately and accurately model a predictable outcome.  As shown in this chart where the mean temperature charted by NOAA over the last 130 years clearly shows that even as CO2 levels have dramatically risen the temperature hasn't even gone up 1 degree Celsius.  Also to note that the temp has remained stable over the last 10 years where no warming has occurred.

When you have billions of dollars of funding pumped into science you don't get accurate science, you get scientists chasing money to fund their research which results in skewed outcomes favorable to the entities funding them (i.e. the agenda makers).

http://c3headlines.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b58035970c012876ffd0b9970c-pi

While I'm all for cleaning up the environment and moving toward more renewable and efficient energy systems, the whole notion that we has human beings have altered the natural cycles of the earth is fucking retarded and anyone who believes that should just step in front of a bus right now and do the gene pool a favor.

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails

We don't understand the earths climate nearly enough to adequately and accurately model a predictable outcome.  As shown in this chart where the mean temperature charted by NOAA over the last 130 years clearly shows that even as CO2 levels have dramatically risen the temperature hasn't even gone up 1 degree Celsius.  Also to note that the temp has remained stable over the last 10 years where no warming has occurred.

When you have billions of dollars of funding pumped into science you don't get accurate science, you get scientists chasing money to fund their research which results in skewed outcomes favorable to the entities funding them (i.e. the agenda makers).

http://c3headlines.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b58035970c012876ffd0b9970c-pi

While I'm all for cleaning up the environment and moving toward more renewable and efficient energy systems, the whole notion that we has human beings have altered the natural cycles of the earth is fucking retarded and anyone who believes that should just step in front of a bus right now and do the gene pool a favor.

Excellent post, dead on!

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899

We don't understand the earths climate nearly enough to adequately and accurately model a predictable outcome.  As shown in this chart where the mean temperature charted by NOAA over the last 130 years clearly shows that even as CO2 levels have dramatically risen the temperature hasn't even gone up 1 degree Celsius.  Also to note that the temp has remained stable over the last 10 years where no warming has occurred.

When you have billions of dollars of funding pumped into science you don't get accurate science, you get scientists chasing money to fund their research which results in skewed outcomes favorable to the entities funding them (i.e. the agenda makers).

http://c3headlines.typepad.com/.a/6a010536b58035970c012876ffd0b9970c-pi

While I'm all for cleaning up the environment and moving toward more renewable and efficient energy systems, the whole notion that we has human beings have altered the natural cycles of the earth is fucking retarded and anyone who believes that should just step in front of a bus right now and do the gene pool a favor.

LOL... the ice sheet is collapsing, the artic barron, the temperatures rising.
Also, do you really want to do this? You are posting bullshit and unless you want an ass raping of epic proportions just fuck off somewhere to non science land. The fact that you are using a ten year period to prove anything is absurd and shows you have no idea what you are talkign about. That is short term climate, it can be influenced strongly by local and cyclical events, a broader lens is required. You are also talking about what type of temperatures?

Are you talking ocean temps? or are you talking surface? again you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. The oceans are acidifying rapidly, ice cores etc.
As you can see the ocean is in fact heating the fuck up which is why the fucking artic has lost so much ice, why the ice sheet is collapsing etc.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/no-warming-in-16-years.htm

This is science, see the references for each claim?


On to the models you claim are inaccurate. If you look at my link you will see that many models predicted this, thus your point is moot. How can they be inaccurate yet correct.

Nice try, anymore bullshit?

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
LOL... the ice sheet is collapsing, the artic barron, the temperatures rising.
Also, do you really want to do this? You are posting bullshit and unless you want an ass raping of epic proportions just fuck off somewhere to non science land. The fact that you are using a ten year period to prove anything is absurd and shows you have no idea what you are talkign about. That is short term climate, it can be influenced strongly by local and cyclical events, a broader lens is required. You are also talking about what type of temperatures?

Are you talking ocean temps? or are you talking surface? again you don't know what the fuck you are talking about. The oceans are acidifying rapidly, ice cores etc.
As you can see the ocean is in fact heating the fuck up which is why the fucking artic has lost so much ice, why the ice sheet is collapsing etc.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/no-warming-in-16-years.htm

This is science, see the references for each claim?


On to the models you claim are inaccurate. If you look at my link you will see that many models predicted this, thus your point is moot. How can they be inaccurate yet correct.

Nice try, anymore bullshit?

I post a chart from NOAA, a nationally recognized institution that's been tracking land and sea temperatures since, well we started tracking them.

You post some opinionated website which links to studies funded with government funding.

If you looked at the chart, which you obviously did not, it goes back 130 years and shows global LAND and SEA temps raising less than 1 degree.

Fuck off to your failed thread of posting cut and pasted financial advice you epic fail of a charlatan.

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660


Mr. Coleman destroys everything regarding this idiotic scam that's backed by billions of dollars funding bad science to further the agenda of those in power and who stand to gain the most monetarily.

I'm sure you'll disregard out of  hand the facts presented by this 80 year old man who is a nationally recognized and awarded meteorologist who has more logic and reason in the mole on his back than you do in all of your pitiful existence.

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
I post a chart from NOAA, a nationally recognized institution that's been tracking land and sea temperatures since, well we started tracking them.

You post some opinionated website which links to studies funded with government funding.

If you looked at the chart, which you obviously did not, it goes back 130 years and shows global LAND and SEA temps raising less than 1 degree.

Fuck off to your failed thread of posting cut and pasted financial advice you epic fail of a charlatan.

You fuck with the bull you get the horns homo, here comes my stud rod.

 The ocean data from NOAA is in line with my claim, the oceans are heating up. In fact most heat over 90% of it is going to the ocean. 


http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/oceans/sea-surface-temp.html

So, we agree, the sea surface temps show heating. In fact they show the highest magnitude of heating (you guessed it) in the last three decades. So we agree the oceans are heating up. You seem to have issue with the magnitude of heating. Explain at what temperature increase are we in peril? deep current and temps are important also but let's stick with your claim.

 I know one sounds like a small number in your head but context needs to haz. The fuckign same data you are looking at to claim nothing is happening is the same data the NOAA say this about.

"Many lines of scientific evidence show the Earth's climate is changing. This page presents the latest information from several independent measures of observed climate change that illustrate an overwhelmingly compelling story of a planet that is undergoing global warming. It is worth noting that increasing global temperature is only one element of observed global climate change. Precipitation patterns are also changing; storms and other extremes are changing as well."

Both of you guys can't be right, is it Emmortal, an old schmoe or the NOAA, the people the schmoe quotes?

So you actually think the globe isn't heating up? are you retarded?


Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2014, 02:01:46 PM »
To further rape your ass let's here the same org's thoughts on not only the warming but man's impact.

How do we know humans are the primary cause of the warming?

"A large body of evidence supports the conclusion that human activity is the primary driver of recent warming. This evidence has accumulated over several decades, and from hundreds of studies. The first line of evidence is our basic physical understanding of how greenhouse gases trap heat, how the climate system responds to increases in greenhouse gases, and how other human and natural factors influence climate. The second line of evidence is from indirect estimates of climate changes over the last 1,000 to 2,000 years. These estimates are often obtained from living things and their remains (like tree rings and corals) which provide a natural archive of climate variations. These indicators show that the recent temperature rise is clearly unusual in at least the last 1,000 years. The third line of evidence is based on comparisons of actual climate with computer models of how we expect climate to behave under certain human influences. For example, when climate models are run with historical increases in greenhouse gases, they show gradual warming of the Earth and ocean surface, increases in ocean heat content, a rise in global sea level, and general retreat of sea ice and snow cover. These and other aspects of modeled climate change are in agreement with observations."

So not only do they shit on your claim that the models aren't accurate, they also agree man is the prime mover here.

We done here?

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2014, 02:08:44 PM »


Mr. Coleman destroys everything regarding this idiotic scam that's backed by billions of dollars funding bad science to further the agenda of those in power and who stand to gain the most monetarily.

I'm sure you'll disregard out of  hand the facts presented by this 80 year old man who is a nationally recognized and awarded meteorologist who has more logic and reason in the mole on his back than you do in all of your pitiful existence.


You didn't have to do this to yourself little fella.

http://www.desmogblog.com/john-coleman

This asshole?

lolollol. let's take a closer loook at this idiot.

this guy has a degree in journalism.

He is a conspiracy theorist

“Some misguided scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long-term scientific data back in the late 1990's to create an illusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental-extremism type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the 'research' to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims.”
- Mr. Coleman, head tart.


A massive idiot also.
“Many people don't accept my position that there is no significant man-made global warming because I am simply a Television Meteorologist without a Ph.D.  I understand that…”

No kidding buddy ::)

Emmortal

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5660
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2014, 05:23:12 PM »
To further rape your ass let's here the same org's thoughts on not only the warming but man's impact.

How do we know humans are the primary cause of the warming?

"A large body of evidence supports the conclusion that human activity is the primary driver of recent warming. This evidence has accumulated over several decades, and from hundreds of studies. The first line of evidence is our basic physical understanding of how greenhouse gases trap heat, how the climate system responds to increases in greenhouse gases, and how other human and natural factors influence climate. The second line of evidence is from indirect estimates of climate changes over the last 1,000 to 2,000 years. These estimates are often obtained from living things and their remains (like tree rings and corals) which provide a natural archive of climate variations. These indicators show that the recent temperature rise is clearly unusual in at least the last 1,000 years. The third line of evidence is based on comparisons of actual climate with computer models of how we expect climate to behave under certain human influences. For example, when climate models are run with historical increases in greenhouse gases, they show gradual warming of the Earth and ocean surface, increases in ocean heat content, a rise in global sea level, and general retreat of sea ice and snow cover. These and other aspects of modeled climate change are in agreement with observations."

So not only do they shit on your claim that the models aren't accurate, they also agree man is the prime mover here.

We done here?

That's what $4.7 billion in tax payer money buys you, an agenda.  It's sad to see you go off on such a idiotic tirade that proves nothing other than the fact that you believe everything you read.  Instead of logically deducting evidence that points towards bad science, because there's money to be had and made, you gobble it up like a $2 whore at a Russian bath house.

I never claimed that there is no warming, there's just no evidence to support that it's man made.  If the scientific community who supports this ridiculous idea is so sure of the facts, why has every single scientist supporting the idea backed out of having a discussion/debate over these so called studies?  There's only one reason, follow the money.  

Of course you dismissed John Coleman as a conspiracy theorist, any simpleton when faced with facts that go against his beliefs would claim such.

Since you are so uneducated on this subject, you should go research Roger Revelle and Hans Sueus(sp?) which were the two scientists who wrote the initial paper on carbon dioxide and man's influence on climate.  This same study was used by Al Gore, who also named Revelle as his mentor (even though Revelle gave him a D in his class and barely remembered Gore), as his spearhead of the campaign for global warming which has now been aptly named climate change.  You should pay attention to what both men, Hans and Roger said in their later years, that their paper was inconclusive and that there wasn't enough data to show that man had any impact on climate.  There are more and more scientists speaking out, it's a shame that most of them are hiding behind their fund money or we could finally move on from this bullshit excuse to kill poor people off by raising energy rates to unreasonably high levels.

This is just one of the MANY farces on this whole scam which I could sit here and shoot a bazooka through all day long.

AbrahamG

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18077
  • Team Pfizer
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2014, 06:24:07 PM »
That's what $4.7 billion in tax payer money buys you, an agenda.  It's sad to see you go off on such a idiotic tirade that proves nothing other than the fact that you believe everything you read.  Instead of logically deducting evidence that points towards bad science, because there's money to be had and made, you gobble it up like a $2 whore at a Russian bath house.

I never claimed that there is no warming, there's just no evidence to support that it's man made.  If the scientific community who supports this ridiculous idea is so sure of the facts, why has every single scientist supporting the idea backed out of having a discussion/debate over these so called studies?  There's only one reason, follow the money.  

Of course you dismissed John Coleman as a conspiracy theorist, any simpleton when faced with facts that go against his beliefs would claim such.

Since you are so uneducated on this subject, you should go research Roger Revelle and Hans Sueus(sp?) which were the two scientists who wrote the initial paper on carbon dioxide and man's influence on climate.  This same study was used by Al Gore, who also named Revelle as his mentor (even though Revelle gave him a D in his class and barely remembered Gore), as his spearhead of the campaign for global warming which has now been aptly named climate change.  You should pay attention to what both men, Hans and Roger said in their later years, that their paper was inconclusive and that there wasn't enough data to show that man had any impact on climate.  There are more and more scientists speaking out, it's a shame that most of them are hiding behind their fund money or we could finally move on from this bullshit excuse to kill poor people off by raising energy rates to unreasonably high levels.

This is just one of the MANY farces on this whole scam which I could sit here and shoot a bazooka through all day long.

If I were you, I'd stop before you need your butt-hole re-puckered.

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2014, 06:47:33 PM »
...
Instead of logically deducting evidence that points towards bad science, because there's money to be had and made, you gobble it up like a $2 whore at a Russian bath house.
... 
Of course you dismissed John Coleman as a conspiracy theorist, any simpleton when faced with facts that go against his beliefs would claim such.
...

Errr, what?  Are you seriously saying that the main reason anyone would discount the opinion of John Coleman is because of anything other than John Coleman's seeming lack of qualification to opine about anything science-related?

Have you read his wikipedia entry?  He's a career TV weatherman known for his "amusing and irreverent style" who helped found The Weather Channel.  That's it.  He has no degree in meteorology or any other science.  He does have a degree in journalism that he got from the University of Illinois in 1957, though.  (Catch that?  1957, which is the year the Soviets launched Sputnik, lol.)

Here, read this and tell me that it makes sense to believe him over any scientist from Isaac Newton to Bill Nye the Science Guy:

John Coleman (born October 15, 1934) is an American TV weatherman and co-founder of The Weather Channel. He has retired from broadcasting after nearly 61 years, working the last twenty at KUSI-TV in San Diego.

Coleman started his career in 1953 at WCIA in Champaign, Illinois, doing the early evening weather forecast and a local bandstand show called At The Hop while he was a student at University of Illinois. After receiving his journalism degree in 1957, he became the weather anchor for WCIA's sister station WMBD-TV in Peoria, Illinois. Coleman was also a weather anchor for KETV in Omaha, WISN-TV in Milwaukee and then WBBM-TV and WLS-TV in Chicago.

At WLS, Coleman was teamed with Fahey Flynn, Joel Daly and Bill Frink to form the Eyewitness News team, creating a news brand name and establishing a highly successful new local news format derisively dubbed "happy talk" by a local television columnist. This style of local news has been widely copied. The team dominated Chicago television news ratings for more than a decade. During his time at Chicago's WLS-TV, Coleman was one of Chicago's most popular weathercasters, famous for his amusing and irreverent style. It was then that Coleman became the original weathercaster on what was then the brand-new ABC network morning program, Good Morning America. He stayed seven years with this top-rated program anchored by David Hartman and Joan Lunden.

In 1981, he persuaded communications entrepreneur Frank Batten to help establish The Weather Channel, serving as TWC's CEO and President during the start-up and its first year of operation. After leaving TWC, Coleman became weather anchor at WCBS-TV in New York and then at WMAQ-TV in Chicago, before moving to Southern California to join the independent television station, KUSI-TV in San Diego, in what Coleman fondly calls, "his retirement job." Coleman abruptly left KUSI while on vacation in April 2014, with no on-air farewell.

Coleman was a member of the American Meteorological Society. He left this organization after he disagreed with the stance on Global Warming/Climate Change.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Coleman_%28news_weathercaster%29

Now, I'm not saying that the other stuff you've written is without merit but it sure doesn't look good when you bring up what this John Coleman thinks.  Especially without being totally upfront about what anyone can learn about him in 30 seconds and and an explanation as to why one shouldn't discount what he says because of it.  




Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #15 on: July 09, 2014, 06:25:12 AM »
That's what $4.7 billion in tax payer money buys you, an agenda.  It's sad to see you go off on such a idiotic tirade that proves nothing other than the fact that you believe everything you read.  Instead of logically deducting evidence that points towards bad science, because there's money to be had and made, you gobble it up like a $2 whore at a Russian bath house.

I never claimed that there is no warming, there's just no evidence to support that it's man made.  If the scientific community who supports this ridiculous idea is so sure of the facts, why has every single scientist supporting the idea backed out of having a discussion/debate over these so called studies?  There's only one reason, follow the money.  

Of course you dismissed John Coleman as a conspiracy theorist, any simpleton when faced with facts that go against his beliefs would claim such.

Since you are so uneducated on this subject, you should go research Roger Revelle and Hans Sueus(sp?) which were the two scientists who wrote the initial paper on carbon dioxide and man's influence on climate.  This same study was used by Al Gore, who also named Revelle as his mentor (even though Revelle gave him a D in his class and barely remembered Gore), as his spearhead of the campaign for global warming which has now been aptly named climate change.  You should pay attention to what both men, Hans and Roger said in their later years, that their paper was inconclusive and that there wasn't enough data to show that man had any impact on climate.  There are more and more scientists speaking out, it's a shame that most of them are hiding behind their fund money or we could finally move on from this bullshit excuse to kill poor people off by raising energy rates to unreasonably high levels.

This is just one of the MANY farces on this whole scam which I could sit here and shoot a bazooka through all day long.


LMAO... I said you didn't need to do this to yourself. Lets go through your retarded post, point by point.

"That's what $4.7 billion in tax payer money buys you, an agenda.  It's sad to see you go off on such a idiotic tirade that proves nothing other than the fact that you believe everything you read.  Instead of logically deducting evidence that points towards bad science, because there's money to be had and made, you gobble it up like a $2 whore at a Russian bath house."

So, previously in this thread you used NOAA data to prove your point, indicating you find them to be reliable. Now when the same org disagrees with everything you are saying (a clear layman) you claim they are corrupt. Wouldn't you think they would fake the data even more? why 1 degree, simpletons like you think one is small so why not make it larger.Meanwhile, you seem oblivious to the fact that science has built in checks like peer review amongst other things, while this coleman moron thinks and anova is when a star blows up.


Of course you dismissed John Coleman as a conspiracy theorist, any simpleton when faced with facts that go against his beliefs would claim such.

You don't seem to understand what a conspiracy theorist is, he is the definition. Let me help.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conspiracy_theory
:A conspiracy theory is an explanatory proposition that accuses two or more persons, a group, or an organization of having caused or covered up, through secret planning and deliberate action, an illegal or harmful event or situation:

Now if you look above... nevermind, let me help you puddin

Mr. Coleman claims and I quote.
"“Some misguided scientists with environmental and political motives manipulated long-term scientific data back in the late 1990's to create an illusion of rapid global warming. Other scientists of the same environmental-extremism type jumped into the circle to support and broaden the 'research' to further enhance the totally slanted, bogus global warming claims.”
- Mr. Coleman, head tart.

Now do I need to point out the obvious or can you make the connection to see why I did in fact dismiss him as a consipracy theorist. if he had sex with boys I would call him a pedophile, you call him a greek romancer.


Since you are so uneducated on this subject, you should go research Roger Revelle and Hans Sueus(sp?) which were the two scientists who wrote the initial paper on carbon dioxide and man's influence on climate.  This same study was used by Al Gore, who also named Revelle as his mentor (even though Revelle gave him a D in his class and barely remembered Gore), as his spearhead of the campaign for global warming which has now been aptly named climate change.  You should pay attention to what both men, Hans and Roger said in their later years, that their paper was inconclusive and that there wasn't enough data to show that man had any impact on climate.  There are more and more scientists speaking out, it's a shame that most of them are hiding behind their fund money or we could finally move on from this bullshit excuse to kill poor people off by raising energy rates to unreasonably high levels.

I have read it, that was how long ago? 1988. He was on the side of warming you asshat and urged that more data needed to be found, we have it. It's been close to twenty years.

You are also aware of Singers role in the last paper correct? he completely wrote it himself. Also, you are aware he was against drastic actions due to the economic impacts, I agree.  

You had enough


headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #16 on: July 09, 2014, 06:55:14 AM »
And yet there's more Antarctic ice then ever. The truth is scientists don't know what the hell is going on, should admit that and stop pushing some bullshit green agenda.
L

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #17 on: July 09, 2014, 09:05:48 AM »
And yet there's more Antarctic ice then ever. The truth is scientists don't know what the hell is going on, should admit that and stop pushing some bullshit green agenda.

but we know why, and the artic loss more then makes up for the gain. Your shortsighted, uneducated, fundamentally flawed, backwards logic fails every time.

it was the thickness that was suprising, you dont even have your lies straight. The wind has caused convergence of the polar vortex causing ice packing. This is due to global warming.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #18 on: July 09, 2014, 09:06:51 AM »
but we know why, and the artic loss more then makes up for the gain. Your shortsighted, uneducated, fundamentally flawed, backwards logic fails every time.

it was the thickness that was suprising, you dont even have your lies straight. The wind has caused convergence of the polar vortex causing ice packing. This is due to global warming.

F the climate and environment.  I want to take a shit on the entrance of the EPA  :D

Roger Bacon

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20957
  • Roger Bacon tries to be witty and fails
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #19 on: July 09, 2014, 09:07:27 AM »
F the climate and environment.  I want to take a shit on the entrance of the EPA  :D

The EPA needs to be abolished

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #20 on: July 09, 2014, 01:05:42 PM »
F the climate and environment.  I want to take a shit on the entrance of the EPA  :D

Hey man, you guys never do ask my position, I am simply defending facts. The globe is heating up, man appears to be the main driver. Do I think coal should be outlawed, nope, that would be stupid, the industry needs a slow shift, one that emphasizes human centered work, while lowering emissions. Likewise, I think more money should be put into climate tech, things like CO2 scrubbers, artificial clouds etc. in the perfect world we could keep raping the earth but side step all the negatives and keep all the jobs.

I think the latter is the best option.

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #21 on: July 09, 2014, 01:09:06 PM »
Hey man, you guys never do ask my position, I am simply defending facts. The globe is heating up, man appears to be the main driver. Do I think coal should be outlawed, nope, that would be stupid, the industry needs a slow shift, one that emphasizes human centered work, while lowering emissions. Likewise, I think more money should be put into climate tech, things like CO2 scrubbers, artificial clouds etc. in the perfect world we could keep raping the earth but side step all the negatives and keep all the jobs.

I think the latter is the best option.

I want to shit in Gores' mouth and burn coal the restof my life

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #22 on: July 09, 2014, 01:25:28 PM »
I want to shit in Gores' mouth and burn coal the restof my life

Thanks for sharing that buddy.

Anything else you would like to share with the group?

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #23 on: July 09, 2014, 01:28:17 PM »
Thanks for sharing that buddy.

Anything else you would like to share with the group?

how about a few coal farts and a pic of michelle Obama scarfing down a tray of cupcakes?

Necrosis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9899
Re: More evidence from the Govt itself that "Global Warming" is a farce
« Reply #24 on: July 09, 2014, 01:43:56 PM »
how about a few coal farts and a pic of michelle Obama scarfing down a tray of cupcakes?

she is a filter feeder and eats by running through dung farms with a wide shit eating grin collecting airborne invertebrates whilst holding infinite husks in her butt.