Hillary was a doper and a choomer too

[Soul Crusher]

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/383372/friend-says-hillary-clinton-was-enthusiastic-pot-user-her-youth-ian-tuttle
 

[James28]

That's your future president there.

[Coach is Back!]

That's your future president there.

Only because she's a women. No other reason.

[240 is Back]

Only because she's a women. No other reason.

president is decided by swing voters.  every time.  The middle 6% decides every election. 

47% will always vote dem, 47% will always vote repub.

So IF hilary will only win because she's a woman, why don't repubs run a woman also? 

[240 is Back]

president is decided by swing voters.  every time.  The middle 6% decides every election. 

47% will always vote dem, 47% will always vote repub.

So IF hilary will only win because she's a woman, why don't repubs run a woman also? 

let me guess.... "Lib lib lib"? 

it's moderates that decide the president.  moderates chose obama over romney, and obama over mccain.   moderates chose bush over gore and bush over kerry.  moderates chose clinton twice, bush once, and reagan twice.  Every time, they decide it.

So, um, why don't repubs put up bachmann, martinez, Palin, kay bailey, etc... and WIN the election against Hilary?

[Coach is Back!]

president is decided by swing voters.  every time.  The middle 6% decides every election. 

47% will always vote dem, 47% will always vote repub.

So IF hilary will only win because she's a woman, why don't repubs run a woman also? 

Sure it is. I remember when people used to the president is just a talking head. Obama proved me right once again. Yes, hillary will win simply because she's a women. Like Obama, she brings nothing to the table with the exception she's an actual candidtate that's was born in America.

[240 is Back]

Sure it is. I remember when people used to the president is just a talking head. Obama proved me right once again. Yes, hillary will win simply because she's a women. Like Obama, she brings nothing to the table with the exception she's an actual candidtate that's was born in America.

you didnt answer the Q.   Why don't repubs nominate a woman also, and neutralize the gender thing?

I know palin flirted with the gender issue in her introductory speech to the nation about cracks in the ceiling, but aside from that, the GOP doesn't seem to embrace the fact.

I do think you're right - I know a few women who would look past her positions/experiences and vote for her, and it could be enough to swing moderates and give her the election.

SO WHY DONT THE REPUBLICANS RUN A WOMAN ALSO?

[James28]

you didnt answer the Q.   Why don't repubs nominate a woman also, and neutralize the gender thing?

I know palin flirted with the gender issue in her introductory speech to the nation about cracks in the ceiling, but aside from that, the GOP doesn't seem to embrace the fact.

I do think you're right - I know a few women who would look past her positions/experiences and vote for her, and it could be enough to swing moderates and give her the election.

SO WHY DONT THE REPUBLICANS RUN A WOMAN ALSO?

Any strong Republican female candidates?  I could get behind a pretty conservative corn-fed blonde from the South with a seductive drawl. Even if from afar.

At the moment it's so boring. It's Hillary for 2016.

[Coach is Back!]

you didnt answer the Q.   Why don't repubs nominate a woman also, and neutralize the gender thing?

I know palin flirted with the gender issue in her introductory speech to the nation about cracks in the ceiling, but aside from that, the GOP doesn't seem to embrace the fact.

I do think you're right - I know a few women who would look past her positions/experiences and vote for her, and it could be enough to swing moderates and give her the election.

SO WHY DONT THE REPUBLICANS RUN A WOMAN ALSO?

Because so far we don't have any viable candidates. Again, vote on a true candidate and not just on emotion. I don't care we vote on a man, women, black, white, etc. if they have a proven record. May the best person win. Libs vote on emotion not on substance. Thats why they tend to fail.

[polychronopolous]

Any strong Republican female candidates?  I could get behind a pretty conservative corn-fed blonde from the South with a seductive drawl. Even if from afar.

At the moment it's so boring. It's Hillary for 2016.

I'm guessing Susanna Martinez, Sarah Palin or Condolezza Rice would be the top choices from a betting standpoint and all of those would be extreme long shots.

Keep an eye on Kelly Ayotte out of New Hampshire in the future although she has kinda floating below the radar in relation to the other 3.

[240 is Back]

Because so far we don't have any viable candidates.

Nonsense.  There are easily a dozen qualified republican women that are experienced, shrewd, educated, and ready to be president.

I think you're selling some of the great republican women short.

[240 is Back]

Libs vote on emotion not on substance. Thats why they tend to fail.

People on both extreme vote on emotion, not on substance/logic.  That's pretty well-known. 

and again, the people in the middle 6% decide elections.  Repubs CAN win a woman and completely neutralize the gender issue.  Heck, given the fact Hilary is so polarizing, just about ANY female candidate can grab MOST of the women vote by just not being hilary lol.   Be 1% less abrasive, and you win the election.  Easy enough.

[Primemuscle]

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/383372/friend-says-hillary-clinton-was-enthusiastic-pot-user-her-youth-ian-tuttle
 

You really need to get a life.

[Soul Crusher]

Yeah - cause past drug abuse is something we cant discuss unless its W's drinking right?   

[Soul Crusher]

Not a single one of you who plan on voting for her wil give one shit about her record of corruption, coverups, lying, stealing, etc. 

For you clowns - its all about advancing a socialist/progressive/liberal agenda and nothing else. 

[LurkerNoMore]

Not a single one of you who plan on voting for her wil give one shit about her record of corruption, coverups, lying, stealing, etc. 

For you clowns - its all about advancing a socialist/progressive/liberal agenda and nothing else. 

Boo Hoo.  Woke up as a crybaby once again.

[I ETA PI]

president is decided by swing voters.  every time.  The middle 6% decides every election.  

47% will always vote dem, 47% will always vote repub.

So IF hilary will only win because she's a woman, why don't repubs run a woman also?  

It'd be the same as when they tried to run Herman Cain, the left will mock her as the "token female" of the GOP and lose their shit trying to discredit her or find some dirt on her.  

My limp-wristed liberal friends will use some dumbfuck reasoning to tell me how running a female candidate PROVES just how sexist the GOP is, just like they told me how disgusted they were that the GOP could be SO RACIST that they would try to get Herman Cain the nomination just because he was black like Obama

[LurkerNoMore]

Herman Cain got himself discredited.  No one else did that.  Can't blame that on anyone but him and the way he just stood in front of the cameras and attempted to lie, while knowing that everyone watching knew it was a lie right away.

[240 is Back]

Yeah - cause past drug abuse is something we cant discuss unless its W's drinking right?   

im pretty sure dubya did coke too

[240 is Back]

Herman Cain got himself discredited.  No one else did that.  Can't blame that on anyone but him and the way he just stood in front of the cameras and attempted to lie, while knowing that everyone watching knew it was a lie right away.

atually, some getbiggers believed til the end that he was framed by a massive conspiracy by 14 separate women.

Even when he admitted lying about hiding a lesbian mistress on payroll for 11 years, oh, she was still a plant lol.

[LurkerNoMore]

atually, some getbiggers believed til the end that he was framed by a massive conspiracy by 14 separate women.

Even when he admitted lying about hiding a lesbian mistress on payroll for 11 years, oh, she was still a plant lol.

Easily proven to be a lib created lie and false scandal to detract from the dazzling potential he had as future leader of the free world huh?

[Soul Crusher]

http://dailycaller.com/2014/07/22/snoop-dogg-got-really-high-at-the-white-house-video/#ixzz38Ee31WyO


 

[240 is Back]

People say "HIlary would only win because of gender" but she would need the MODERATE SWING VOTE to win the general election.

People say "obama only won because of skin color" but he won the MODERATE SWING VOTE and that's why he won eleciton.

Why the Fck can't repubs run a minority and/or a woman, if this is the case?    They chose to snub qualified, prepared and above all, mature and sane candidates like Bachmann and Herman cain. 

[Soul Crusher]

People say "HIlary would only win because of gender" but she would need the MODERATE SWING VOTE to win the general election.

People say "obama only won because of skin color" but he won the MODERATE SWING VOTE and that's why he won eleciton.

Why the Fck can't repubs run a minority and/or a woman, if this is the case?    They chose to snub qualified, prepared and above all, mature and sane candidates like Bachmann and Herman cain. 

No matter who the GOP puts up will be the same infantile shit from libs - war on women, gay marriage, abortion, birth control, and other mamby pamby baby shit. 

[RRKore]

Only because she's a women. No other reason.

LOL.  "...she's a women."

Not "wimmin"?  

Coach, are you a clever troll or are you getting dumber Flowers for Algernon-style?