MSNBC has lowest ratings in nearly a decade - LMFAO!!! Ha Ha Ha!!!

[RRKore]

Your request for percentages is retarded.  Nobody keeps track of ideology and bias that way.  Pretty dumb way to approach the issue if you ask me.   

You sure about this BB? 

I know you were raised during a time when the abacus was cutting edge technology but things are a little different now...

[Dos Equis]

You sure about this BB? 

I know you were raised during a time when the abacus was cutting edge technology but things are a little different now...

I'm sure you are a simpleton.  No doubt about that. 

[RRKore]

I'm sure you are a simpleton.  No doubt about that. 

Oh, I get it:  I used the word "sure" in my question.  And then you used the word "sure" in your answer (where you engaged in name-calling).

Clever!! 

Which sandbox did you learn this from?

[Dos Equis]

Oh, I get it:  I used the word "sure" in my question.  And then you used the word "sure" in your answer (where you engaged in name-calling).

Clever!! 

Which sandbox did you learn this from?

*yawn*

[240 is Back]

Your request for percentages is retarded.  Nobody keeps track of ideology and bias that way.  Pretty dumb way to approach the issue if you ask me.   

Actually, the weekly standard & Pew, do keep track of that bias/ideology.  

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/143lkblo.asp

[Dos Equis]

Actually, the weekly standard & Pew, do keep track of that bias/ideology.  

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/143lkblo.asp

Oh brother.     Such a typical pattern.  The link you provided says nothing about statistics related to liberal media bias.  It gives percentages of liberal and conservative journalists. 

Swing and a miss. 

[RRKore]

*yawn*

Jeez, ya might as well just yell "uncle". LOL

I wouldn't doubt it if your energy is flagging right about now, though, actually.  Time for the old man to get a nap pretty soon, eh?