Author Topic: Dem's vs GOP on economics.  (Read 17418 times)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63575
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #150 on: August 07, 2014, 12:12:30 PM »
You accidentally a word, mang.

Thank you _______ Simon.  You are quite the Grammar ____. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63575
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #151 on: August 07, 2014, 12:13:21 PM »
The dumb in this thread man.

You mean like posting an excerpt of an article that you didn't read and that doesn't support the point you were trying to make?

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #152 on: August 07, 2014, 12:22:00 PM »
He failed and is not a successful (what ever he's supposed to be doing) and not successful at doing his job. If it was a success his approval numbers would be turned around and would the support of the American people. He doesn't. Just about what ever policy that he has tried to implement has failed miserably. From cash to klunkers to Obamacare to having the slowest economic turn around ever. Don't even bring up his foreign policies, between him, Kerry and Clinton (Killary) I don't know who's worse. He and the left in Washington literally have ZERO integrity and offer one lie to cover another lie.   

yes Joe Loco - Obama is a failure and conversely you are a winner

Everyone can see that

Whatever you need to tell yourself just keep on doing it

whork

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6587
  • Getbig!
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #153 on: August 07, 2014, 04:45:27 PM »
He failed and is not a successful (what ever he's supposed to be doing) and not successful at doing his job. If it was a success his approval numbers would be turned around and would the support of the American people. He doesn't. Just about what ever policy that he has tried to implement has failed miserably. From cash to klunkers to Obamacare to having the slowest economic turn around ever. Don't even bring up his foreign policies, between him, Kerry and Clinton (Killary) I don't know who's worse. He and the left in Washington literally have ZERO integrity and offer one lie to cover another lie.   

A racist Chooming radical commie Jihadist sleeper born in Kenya and hell-bent on destroying the US and the world, somehow manages to become a 2 time elected president.

And you call him unsuccesful ???

Option D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17367
  • Kelly the Con Way
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #154 on: August 07, 2014, 05:10:42 PM »
A racist Chooming radical commie Jihadist sleeper born in Kenya and hell-bent on destroying the US and the world, somehow manages to become a 2 time elected president.

And you call him unsuccesful ???

Like

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #155 on: August 07, 2014, 05:16:12 PM »
Thank you _______ Simon.  You are quite the Grammar ____. 

Why so defensive, Beach Bummer?  

Clearly, you mistakenly left out a word which I then brought to your attention in a friendly way.  (Maybe you aren't familiar with the "accidentally a word" thang that's popular on bigger forums like Reddit?)

To be fair, it occurs to me that if, seemingly due to your advanced age, you've been finding yourself making small errors like that more and more often then I understand how your resulting frustration might cause you to want to call names instead of just use the board's edit function.  (Hmmm, didn't some other poster recently say that the quality of your posts seems to have gone down in recent times compared to your writing of a few years ago?)

If that's the case, then no harm done and I extend you my honest sympathy.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59468
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #156 on: August 07, 2014, 07:10:37 PM »
A racist Chooming radical commie Jihadist sleeper born in Kenya and hell-bent on destroying the US and the world, somehow manages to become a 2 time elected president.

And you call him unsuccesful ???


Was never vetted. Again, you're confusing pulling off an "election" with actual job performance. HE IS NOT A COMPETENT LEADER.

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 63575
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #157 on: August 07, 2014, 07:13:37 PM »
Why so defensive, Beach Bummer?  

Clearly, you mistakenly left out a word which I then brought to your attention in a friendly way.  (Maybe you aren't familiar with the "accidentally a word" thang that's popular on bigger forums like Reddit?)

To be fair, it occurs to me that if, seemingly due to your advanced age, you've been finding yourself making small errors like that more and more often then I understand how your resulting frustration might cause you to want to call names instead of just use the board's edit function.  (Hmmm, didn't some other poster recently say that the quality of your posts seems to have gone down in recent times compared to your writing of a few years ago?)

If that's the case, then no harm done and I extend you my honest sympathy.

Thank ____ much for ______ concern _______ Simon. 

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #158 on: August 07, 2014, 07:38:36 PM »
Was never vetted. Again, you're confusing pulling off an "election" with actual job performance. HE IS NOT A COMPETENT LEADER.

please show your proof that he wasn't vetted

also, who vetted you as a "coach" ?

RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #159 on: August 07, 2014, 08:39:27 PM »
Thank ____ much for ______ concern _______ Simon. 

Not bad.  It'd be a little funnier without the blanks, imo, though.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59468
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #160 on: August 07, 2014, 10:18:07 PM »
please show your proof that he wasn't vetted

also, who vetted you as a "coach" ?


I have as much access to confidential documents as you do. So telling me to "prove it" is hysterical. But I do know people (family) who does have access but I will never know. But let's start here...

http://www.newsmax.com/US/barack-obama-president-2008/2011/03/28/id/390952/

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59468
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #161 on: August 07, 2014, 10:27:48 PM »
As for my "vetting" every school district I or my other coaches work in must go through a background check whether as a stipend coach, a volunteer or as an outside contractor. Even as an AAU sponsored gym I can't nor can my employees, interns or coaches be in the AAU until they go through a background check as with the school districts, both are through a live scan process. I personally don't hire without a live scan process.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #162 on: August 07, 2014, 10:58:26 PM »
Was never vetted. Again, you're confusing pulling off an "election" with actual job performance. HE IS NOT A COMPETENT LEADER.


and you're confusing your goals with the goals of unemployed, lazy, pothead liberals.

if you're an unemployed, lazy, pothead liberal, you love obama.  he's done a bang-up job.  cash your stamps, enjoy medically covered pot and scarce law enforcement, and a bunch of otherwise shitty things that lazy libs like.

coach, you are none of these things, so you hate obama.

it's all about PERSPECTIVE.  Obama can't win again, but another obama, whether it's hilary or cuomo or warren or whoever, is just going to win next time... UNTIL the repubs can convince 5% of the population that conservatism is better than liberalism.

I hear "obama sucks", I hear "Obama is dumb".... but it appears 53% of the nation is okay with that.   So maybe Repubs should stop trying to demonize liberalism (cause hey, it doens't work... people hate the word liberal but the majority of americans have liberal POSITIONS, and there's lots of data to prove this).   Stop demonizing liberalism, and instead, tell us why conservatism is the way to go.

Coach, why should the unemployed, lazy stoner pothead slacker vote republican in 2016?   Give him 3 good reasons.  THAT is how you win the White House back.

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59468
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #163 on: August 07, 2014, 11:03:56 PM »
I'll give you 1 good reason. Because the majority of the people who voted for Obama, regret it.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #164 on: August 07, 2014, 11:15:08 PM »
I'll give you 1 good reason. Because the majority of the people who voted for Obama, regret it.

They'd good.  53% of Americans chose Obama. Link?  That's a good one. 

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59468
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #165 on: August 07, 2014, 11:44:34 PM »
They'd good.  53% of Americans chose Obama. Link?  That's a good one. 

Post your poll. If it's CNN you can bet that poll was done like in the Castro district in SF or a pot party in Denver or an oppressed neighborhood in LA. 

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #166 on: August 08, 2014, 05:32:39 AM »
Um, 52.9% of people chose obama at the election booth last time.  That's what I was talking about, sorry I wasn't clear.

Now, as far as your statement about "Because the majority of the people who voted for Obama, regret it. "

Link to that?  Are you referring to that 71% poll which was in error, and the actual number of obama voters that said they regret it is actually much much lower?   I tried finding a poll to support you, cause that is a REALLY good point, but could not find one.  That poll with 71% somehow included Romney voters lol... so yeah, it was a little weird there.  If you can show a LEGIT link showing a poll where the MAJORITY OF PEOPLE THAT VOTED FOR OBAMA now regret it, that'd be excellent!

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #167 on: August 08, 2014, 07:43:44 AM »
I have as much access to confidential documents as you do. So telling me to "prove it" is hysterical. But I do know people (family) who does have access but I will never know. But let's start here...

http://www.newsmax.com/US/barack-obama-president-2008/2011/03/28/id/390952/

If I wanted to be like you I would simply say that newsmax is not credible and then I would not address anything in the article.

Here's an example of how you do that when you want can't dispute something:

Because Maddow is as credible as Obama and will spin anything he can to make him look good. Neither have one redeeming good quality about them.

I won't bother to do that with you though I could and you of course would have no problem with it since you do that yourself.

The author of the article just rehashes the same old tired nonsense that right wing morons tell each other.  Note by the way that he says that the 2008 candidates were vetted by the press and since Obama was a candidate in 2008 he was therefore vetted in the exact same way as all other candidates. Of course in Obama's case the press took the extra step of making up lies, slandering him, attacking him and his family, etc...   So yes, Obama was vetted in the same way as any other candidate and more than most.

Since you've brought up the concept that Obama "was never vetted" why don't you explain to all of us what the official and proper vetting process is for a candidate for POTUS.   Most people of normal intelligence will tell you that his/her party will vet the candidate to make sure he has no skeletons and then the opposition and the press further vet the candidate through the media over the course of an election.  That is what most people of normal intelligence will tell you the process is in the country.   Now, if you think there is some other process please tell us what that is.

Now let's move on to your vetting as a legitimate coach

As for my "vetting" every school district I or my other coaches work in must go through a background check whether as a stipend coach, a volunteer or as an outside contractor. Even as an AAU sponsored gym I can't nor can my employees, interns or coaches be in the AAU until they go through a background check as with the school districts, both are through a live scan process. I personally don't hire without a live scan process.

Wow - you had a background check. 

How does that prove you are a legitimate coach

BTW - aren't you the one who is constantly reminding us how fucked up in every way the state of California is due to liberal politicians.   Do you really think they can even conduct an adequate background check?  Would you like me to list all of your fellow coaches and teachers in CA who in recent years have been arrested on various charges related to molesting children, child porn, drugs, etc...  Seriously, I'll be glad to start listing them if you'd like.  It's a pretty simple google search.

Clearly those background checks are basically worthless and they certainly don't prove you are a legitimate coach so thanks for actually providing the proof that you are in fact not a legitimate coach


Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 59468
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #168 on: August 08, 2014, 07:57:33 AM »
If I wanted to be like you I would simply say that newsmax is not credible and then I would not address anything in the article.

Here's an example of how you do that when you want can't dispute something:

I won't bother to do that with you though I could and you of course would have no problem with it since you do that yourself.

The author of the article just rehashes the same old tired nonsense that right wing morons tell each other.  Note by the way that he says that the 2008 candidates were vetted by the press and since Obama was a candidate in 2008 he was therefore vetted in the exact same way as all other candidates. Of course in Obama's case the press took the extra step of making up lies, slandering him, attacking him and his family, etc...   So yes, Obama was vetted in the same way as any other candidate and more than most.

Since you've brought up the concept that Obama "was never vetted" why don't you explain to all of us what the official and proper vetting process is for a candidate for POTUS.   Most people of normal intelligence will tell you that his/her party will vet the candidate to make sure he has no skeletons and then the opposition and the press further vet the candidate through the media over the course of an election.  That is what most people of normal intelligence will tell you the process is in the country.   Now, if you think there is some other process please tell us what that is.

Now let's move on to your vetting as a legitimate coach

Wow - you had a background check. 

How does that prove you are a legitimate coach

BTW - aren't you the one who is constantly reminding us how fucked up in every way the state of California is due to liberal politicians.   Do you really think they can even conduct an adequate background check?  Would you like me to list all of your fellow coaches and teachers in CA who in recent years have been arrested on various charges related to molesting children, child porn, drugs, etc...  Seriously, I'll be glad to start listing them if you'd like.  It's a pretty simple google search.

Clearly those background checks are basically worthless and they certainly don't prove you are a legitimate coach so thanks for actually providing the proof that you are in fact not a legitimate coach



Dude, in all honesty, you're so much in denial it could be labeled as clinical delusion disorder. No matter what happens you'll deem this loser as your massiah at all costs. No matter what polls say, no matter if bows and kisses the asses of dictators, no matter how much of a traitor he is. This asshole could behead his own kid and you'd still defend him....you, have been brainwashed. You would be considered an enemy of this country if there were a real president in place.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #169 on: August 08, 2014, 09:12:19 AM »
Dude, in all honesty, you're so much in denial it could be labeled as clinical delusion disorder. No matter what happens you'll deem this loser as your massiah at all costs. No matter what polls say, no matter if bows and kisses the asses of dictators, no matter how much of a traitor he is. This asshole could behead his own kid and you'd still defend him....you, have been brainwashed. You would be considered an enemy of this country if there were a real president in place.

Says the man who believe showing teenagers how to flip tires in an alley behind a storage locker somehow makes him a success while the two term elected leader of the free world is a failure

Joe Loco this is your premise ....remember

you said Obama wasn't properly vetted yet the fact is that Obama was vetted in the exact same way that every other candidate is vetted which is by his party, the opposition party and then by the press

Now, the fact that you are an illegitimate coach is completely different issue

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39256
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #170 on: August 08, 2014, 09:17:35 AM »
Says the man who believe showing teenagers how to flip tires in an alley behind a storage locker somehow makes him a success while the two term elected leader of the free world is a failure

Joe Loco this is your premise ....remember

you said Obama wasn't properly vetted yet the fact is that Obama was vetted in the exact same way that every other candidate is vetted which is by his party, the opposition party and then by the press

Now, the fact that you are an illegitimate coach is completely different issue

You don't even lift bro

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #171 on: August 08, 2014, 09:21:42 AM »
I'll give you 1 good reason. Because the majority of the people who voted for Obama, regret it.

Source?

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #172 on: August 08, 2014, 09:22:59 AM »
You don't even lift bro

yep, not since about 18 hours ago

how about you Nancy ?


RRKore

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2628
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #173 on: August 08, 2014, 09:31:04 AM »
Um, 52.9% of people chose obama at the election booth last time.  That's what I was talking about, sorry I wasn't clear.

Now, as far as your statement about "Because the majority of the people who voted for Obama, regret it. "

Link to that?  Are you referring to that 71% poll which was in error, and the actual number of obama voters that said they regret it is actually much much lower?   I tried finding a poll to support you, cause that is a REALLY good point, but could not find one.  That poll with 71% somehow included Romney voters lol... so yeah, it was a little weird there.  If you can show a LEGIT link showing a poll where the MAJORITY OF PEOPLE THAT VOTED FOR OBAMA now regret it, that'd be excellent!

Honestly, even if Coach is right that the majority of people who voted for Obama now regret it it's still not a good point, imo because it's just another negative statement Republicans are making about democrats instead of a positive statement about the policies that Republicans support.  (If your message is basically, "Yeah, we suck -- but not as much as Obama" I don't think that motivates people to vote;  I think many voters will just say, "we're fucked either way" and stay home.)

Not to mention that Coach's reason seems to presuppose that every democrat will make the same sort of decisions that Obama would make (or has made).  All dems are not the same any more than all republicans are.

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Re: Dem's vs GOP on economics.
« Reply #174 on: August 08, 2014, 09:49:43 AM »
Honestly, even if Coach is right that the majority of people who voted for Obama now regret it it's still not a good point, imo because it's just another negative statement Republicans are making about democrats instead of a positive statement about the policies that Republicans support.  (If your message is basically, "Yeah, we suck -- but not as much as Obama" I don't think that motivates people to vote;  I think many voters will just say, "we're fucked either way" and stay home.)

Not to mention that Coach's reason seems to presuppose that every democrat will make the same sort of decisions that Obama would make (or has made).  All dems are not the same any more than all republicans are.

that should be pretty easy to prove if it were true