Michael Brown - Discuss the facts and the truth

[Archer77]

Huh?

He doesn't understand the difference between murder and killing. 

[The Ugly]

He doesn't understand the difference between murder and killing.  

Yet he's got an opinion on the case. Lovely.

[Lustral]

Just heard some libtard on BBC say that the majority black community fund the police there with their taxes. What line of work involves wearing pants halfway down your ass with socks and sandals while robbing convenience stores?

[Mawse]

Just heard some libtard on BBC say that the majority black community fund the police there with their taxes. What line of work involves wearing pants halfway down your ass with socks and sandals while robbing convenience stores?

yeah, not sure where those taxes come from, since they don't pay property tax on Section 8 housing and come tax time they get back more than they paid thanks to EITC (for the tiny group of 'the community' that actually work and pay taxes)

Technically they pay sales tax even if that money was given to them courtesy of actual, working taxpayers in the first place

[tommywishbone]

Moral of the story... It's 2014 and in America the cops will shoot you and kill you and get two weeks off, paid, and then when they come back to work they will get a nice "desk job" for a few months.

[NarcissisticDeity]

Moral of the story... It's 2014 and in America the cops will shoot you and kill you and get two weeks off, paid, and then when they come back to work they will get a nice "desk job" for a few months.

The moral of the story is , don't attack a cop they can shoot you and get two weeks off paid

[Archer77]

The moral of the story is , don't attack a cop they can shoot you and get two weeks off paid

The moral of the story is, do nothing about the violence in your community until a white person kills someone and get free stuff.

[The Ugly]

The moral of the story is, do nothing about the violence in your community until a white person kills someone and get free stuff.

Took one for the team.

[tommywishbone]

Moral of the story... J-walking kills.

[Lustral]

The moral of the story is, do nothing about the violence in your community until a white person kills someone and get free stuff.

[Archer77]

Moral of the story... J-walking kills.

Moral of the story, disingenuous moral crusades pay.

[mr.turbo]

Huh?

specifically unarmed people running away like the precedent

[NarcissisticDeity]

Moral of the story... J-walking kills.

No , attacking a cop gets you killed

[240 is Back]

Moral of the story... J-walking kills.

Jay walking.

[Archer77]

specifically unarmed people running away like the precedent

No proof of this.  On the contrary, evidence indicates otherwise. 

[tommywishbone]

Jay walking.

Indeed! 

[NarcissisticDeity]

specifically unarmed people running away like the precedent

He wasn't running away , stop perpetuation this lie. All shots were in the front.

[Archer77]

He wasn't running away , stop perpetuation this lie. All shots were in the front.

Would this be the proper time to tell him santa claus doesn't exist?

[NarcissisticDeity]

Would this be the proper time to tell him santa claus doesn't exist?

No , I don't think he can handle more than one fairy tail being shattered at a time.

[mr.turbo]

I was talking about precedent that was cited earlier not the wilson case

that's why I said *precedent*  

[Archer77]

I was talking about precedent that was cited earlier not the wilson case

that's why I said *precedent*  

You're equating the two incidents.

[mr.turbo]

You're equating the two incidents.

some guy named BB posted it thinking it would exonerate the cop

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_v._Garner

so I read it and judge ruled against the shooter which is a critical distinction to say the least!

[BB]

some guy named BB posted it thinking it would exonerate the cop

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_v._Garner

so I read it and judge ruled against the shooter which is a critical distinction to say the least!

I still think that case has merit here.  While it deals with fleeing suspects, it backs up that the police have a right to shoot if they perceive a threat. It doesn't matter if he is outside the car, 15 feet away, etc... A lot of whiners seem to go on, and on about the distance, etc.... It means nothing.

It's a basic tenet of self defense in both civil and police guidelines. If the officer can clearly articulate that he felt the man was a threat then he has the right to shoot. He can shoot them unarmed, he can shoot them running, etc...  All he has to do is convince one juror.

[Archer77]

some guy named BB posted it thinking it would exonerate the cop

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_v._Garner

so I read it and judge ruled against the shooter which is a critical distinction to say the least!

The judges ruling doesn't matter in terms of the Brown shooting unless you believe Brown was shot in the back while fleeing.  None of the evidence indicates that's what happened.  You can't equate the two cases when they are different.

[Mr. MB]

What is coming is the angle of entry and pass thru of each bullet. This more than likely proves that the account of the office'rs friend when she called into a radio show last week will be proven as correct. Her account seems true as she says days before the autopsy showed a forehead entry that the office shot him in the forehead as he charged towards him. They will also do forensics to prove that Michael's body was inside the patrol car. Facts will rule here and not go over well with the black community.

If you older getbiggers recall is that JFKs bullet entry was a factor proving that they came from above.