gotta love how modern science claims there are 'negative charges"

[Marty Champions]

oh boy what a crock of shit, how can you have a negative charge?

the word "charge" implies an energy or force.  you cant have a negative charge , you can have energy going in different directions, vacuums , repulsion but not 'negative 'charge'

its an ambiguous term

[forillagorilla]

oh boy what a crock of shit, how can you have a negative charge?

the word "charge" implies an energy or force.  you cant have a negative charge , you can have energy going in different directions, vacuums , repulsion but not 'negative 'charge'

its an ambiguous term

Your just not smart enough to understand.

[thegamechanger]

what does modern science says about negatives in weightlifting

[FermiDirac]

Stick to discussing heme iron  

Leave the scientific taxonomy to the professionals.

[Howard]

oh boy what a crock of shit, how can you have a negative charge?

the word "charge" implies an energy or force.  you cant have a negative charge , you can have energy going in different directions, vacuums , repulsion but not 'negative 'charge'

its an ambiguous term

Ok there "nick tesla", the terms positive ( + ) and negative (- )denote, the   flow of electrons on a conducting material.

[forillagorilla]

Ok there "nick tesla", the terms positive ( + ) and negative (- )denote, the   flow of electrons on a conducting material.

Exactly!! What a total dumbass!! Questions like this just show that you can't ride a "copy and paste" degree very far!

[Marty Champions]

Ok there "nick tesla", the terms positive ( + ) and negative (- )denote, the   flow of electrons on a conducting material.

youre actially wrong "modern science" says

Electrons are ALWAYS negatively charged.
Protons are ALWAYS positively charged.

look what i said above , i was talking about direction of flow

there is still no existing "negative charge" just flow in different directions


it shouldnt be called a negative charge if the electrons are flowing directionally


the terminology is screwed up and misleading

[Marty Champions]

Exactly!! What a total dumbass!! Questions like this just show that you can't ride a "copy and paste" degree very far!

wow so wait are you disagreeing with modern science too?

modern science says
Electrons are ALWAYS negatively charged.
Protons are ALWAYS positively charged.

[Marty Champions]

there is no such thing as a positive electron in "modern science" textbooks

again i seem to be the enemy when i bring the truth and point to the fallacies

[FermiDirac]

Yes it's screwed up and misleading, but only for simpletons who aren't physicists. Those who have a background in physics have no problems or qualms dealing with "negative" charges.
It's an unfortunate result of the last turn of century, when they decided the electrons to "carry" the negative charge. Our current society is so strongly integrated with this result of negative charges that we cannot change this in any pleasant manner.

I suggest you actually take up a few courses in plasma physics and electro dynamics. Once you've mastered the four fundamental equations of electrodynamics, Maxwell's equations, then at long last you will grasp this concept.

[FermiDirac]

there is no such thing as a positive electron in "modern science" textbooks

again i seem to be the enemy when i bring the truth and point to the fallacies

They are called positrons and they do exist. 

[Marty Champions]

They are called positrons and they do exist. 

a positron is not an electron. you cant call two same things two different things , this is just a silly argument of semantics

its like saying an electron 'is' a proton because its in an atom but 'different'

[FermiDirac]

a positron is not an electron. you cant call two same things two different things , this is just a silly argument of semantics

its like saying an electron 'is' a proton because its in an atom but 'different'

Call it whatever you want, it fulfils every characteristic of the particle called electron except its opposite charge.
As a matter of fact, the positron is an electron, it's just that it is the antimatter equivalent.

Dirac wrote a follow-up paper in December 1929[3] that attempted to explain the unavoidable negative-energy solution for the relativistic electron. He argued that "... an electron with negative energy moves in an external [electromagnetic] field as though it carries a positive charge." He further asserted that all of space could be regarded as a "sea" of negative energy states that were filled, so as to prevent electrons jumping between positive energy states (negative electric charge) and negative energy states (positive charge).

[Howard]

Yes it's screwed up and misleading, but only for simpletons who aren't physicists. Those who have a background in physics have no problems or qualms dealing with "negative" charges.
It's an unfortunate result of the last turn of century, when they decided the electrons to "carry" the negative charge. Our current society is so strongly integrated with this result of negative charges that we cannot change this in any pleasant manner.

I suggest you actually take up a few courses in plasma physics and electro dynamics. Once you've mastered the four fundamental equations of electrodynamics, Maxwell's equations, then at long last you will grasp this concept.

Bingo 

But let's keep our posts positive 

[Marty Champions]

Call it whatever you want, it fulfils every characteristic of the particle called electron except its opposite charge.
As a matter of fact, the positron is an electron, it's just that it is the antimatter equivalent.

antimatter/dark matter= ambiguous terminology

lets explain antimatter in a way thats less ambiguous

any "expert" will tell you they cant explain dark matter/antimatter, im sure it is explainable though, but they are never certain with authority when giving a synopsis of antimatter/dark matter

you see if they give names to things like "positrons" with ambiguous undefined words like antimatter and dark matter it makes it all useless...useless untill we give clear explanations of things to wich every critical thinker can comprehend it

[El Diablo Blanco]

I prefer Dark Energon

[Marty Champions]

again people claiming to know more than the falcon yet mysteriously vanish from discussion when put in there place 

[forillagorilla]

Marty is an uneducated drunk that has a degree from CPU - "Copy / Paste University"

When confronted by those with actual degrees he looks like a total buffoon..

[Marty Champions]

Marty is an uneducated drunk that has a degree from CPU - "Copy / Paste University"

When confronted by those with actual degrees he looks like a total buffoon..

well where am i wrong?

[Gonuclear]

oh boy what a crock of shit, how can you have a negative charge?

the word "charge" implies an energy or force.  you cant have a negative charge , you can have energy going in different directions, vacuums , repulsion but not 'negative 'charge'

its an ambiguous term

How can you have a negative charge?  In the same way you can have an ignoramus like you. 

Hope that helps.

[SF1900]

Johnny Falcon, drop the electricity studies. Start to study Chaos theory.

[Grape Ape]

Johnny Falcon, drop the electricity studies. Start to study Chaos theory.

Who wants to study tire flipping and deadlifts?

[SF1900]

Who wants to study tire flipping and deadlifts?

How can we incorporate electricity and chaos theory into the study of tire flipping and deadlifts.

[Grape Ape]

How can we incorporate electricity and chaos theory into the study of tire flipping and deadlifts.

Hook a car battery up to chaos' nuts and have him flip a tire.