Message from USMC to Isis

[OTHstrong]

I disagree with putting even one more American life in danger. These guys are not fighting fair. Like I said earlier and I admit its dastardly. Level the area where the drones show them to  be without regard for collateral. Rinse repeat till everything is dead.  Staying alive is not being a pussy.Fucking with a superior nation and hiding behind women and children is. You dont fuck with a superior military power and if you are an indigenous population , You best not let those terrorist into your country. If they are homegrown then the whole country is an acceptable target.

We can send the troops in after the bombing is done to exterminate whatever enemy fighters are left.

idiot 

[Tapeworm]

There's no reasoning with these people.  One little invading & occupying force moves into their country and they turn immediately to violence.  They've proved they're not a peaceful people like we are.  Lets kill them.

[Kim Jong Bob]

Saddam would never let those animals put their foot on iraqs land....just sayisure he was a evil dictator but im sure thwy had it better under his rule and i dont see thisnending anywheresoon. The afghanwas was supposed to go quick and here we are 13 year later still fighting these animals (yes we, my swedish militaryfriend lostchis leg 3-4 years ago or so )

[King Shizzo]

War is not political. War is brutal.

Collateral damage is almost necessary at this point.

[Kim Jong Bob]

Yes.

I admire OTHs moral grandstanding but his beliefs on war are rooted in the best of ideology....

He also believes we shouldnt have dropped the bombs on Japan (because it indiscriminately killed civilians and children), even though it saved untold millions more lives than it ended...

As i said, i admire his ideological purity, but its a naiive outlook on warfare, ezpecially modern warfare against religious zealots.

i used to think like that to, until i started to read me up on this , the war would habe lasted a long time more and alot of civiliana would habe been killed before the japs would habe surrender. They where mercyfull when they sweeped the villages and citys and a lot of soldiers would habe been dead to. Did more die by the abombs them it woulf have without? I dont know but i think so

I no how oth thinks, difference btw civilians and soldiers but as i said the japs where mercifull

[Kim Jong Bob]

War is not political. War is brutal.

Collateral damage is almost necessary at this point.

lol atcthe first part   of cource its often political are you kiddong with me?

[King Shizzo]

lol atcthe first part   of cource its often political are you kiddong with me?

The way war is carried out should not be political.

War is supposed to be an endgame. Death is the end. There comes a point where you should just kill.

[Nails]

[f450]

idiot 

Thanks.  You would feel differently if it was your son or brother being beheaded.  It is the sanctimonious thinking and better than thou attitudes of people like you that is allowing this pestilence to spread. You do not understand how to combat pure unadulterated evil and so I can't blame you  for thinking and feeling the way you do.

[OTHstrong]

War is not political. War is brutal.

Collateral damage is almost necessary at this point.

wrong, war is political always and it has to be, you can not take politics away from war or it will result in 10 time the chaos, however extreme politics is complete horseshit.

[OTHstrong]

Thanks.  You would feel differently if it was your son or brother being beheaded.  It is the sanctimonious thinking and better than thou attitudes of people like you that is allowing this pestilence to spread. You do not understand how to combat pure unadulterated evil and so I can't blame you  for thinking and feeling the way you do.

and you would feel differently if it was your son under the nuke

[Howard]

A message has gone viral which has been attributed to a Marine veteran, Nick Powers, who posted it on Facebook.

***



#AMessagefromUStoISIS

To all you ignorant Islamic extremist f—ks. As I sit here watching you execute women, children and men in the Middle East I chuckle. Why do I chuckle you may ask? Well let me explain something to you idiots who think you are so tough. You are scaring a population that doesn’t know how to fight, you’re bullying the weak.

What did Saddam’s troops do when we came to town? Surrendered, twice… All your threats of coming to America and raising your flag over the White House amuse me more than you could ever understand. In 2012 there were 21.2 million veterans in the United States. Do you understand what that means? That means there are millions of pissed off veterans who have been dealing with years of abuse from their government stabbing them in the backs and having to watch friends die because you Islamic idiots can’t seem to act like human beings and stop terrorism and violence.

It’s one thing to take over an Islamic state, pretty sure we plowed through Fallujah in 4 days, do you really think you stand a chance on US soil? Do you really think it would be smart to poke that bear? Remember we are armed in the US and I can promise you that the Geneva Conventions will not apply to you. You attack us and there is no mercy. The ball is in your court Islam, we are more than ready to send you to your “prophet” Mohamed….

Just one more reason, I'm proud to have been an active duty, enlisted marine.  Oooh rah jarheads 

[WalterWhite]

and you would feel differently if it was your son under the nuke

West Point graduates have accounted for a higher percentage of U.S. military combat deaths in the post-9/11 war on terrorism than in all but one major American conflict since the academy’s founding in 1802.

Between this fact and my permanently maimed nephew I can address this. If we are going to fight then we have to fight on even ground with the enemy.  Rules of engagement need to change and we need to stop vilifying soldiers sent to do a job. If I lost a family member it would simply strengthen my resolve to beat down the enemy and piss on their graves.

US soldiers are not trained to be political we are trained to defeat and enemy plain and simple.

My nephew at age 19.  A getbigger through and through.

[Shockwave]

Just one more reason, I'm proud to have been an active duty, enlisted marine.  Oooh rah jarheads 

x2

Ooh Rah Marine............

[The Ugly]

and you would feel differently if it was your son under the nuke

You're part of the problem. Save your bleeding heart faggotry for the classroom.

[Shockwave]

Thanks.  You would feel differently if it was your son or brother being beheaded.  It is the sanctimonious thinking and better than thou attitudes of people like you that is allowing this pestilence to spread. You do not understand how to combat pure unadulterated evil and so I can't blame you  for thinking and feeling the way you do.

As i said, his idealogical purity is respectable...

But hes naiive to think you can win wars while believing as he does.

Wars take a cold precise logical thinking to ensure minimal friendly casualties while ensuring the comolete destruction of your foe.

A certain amount of humanity has to be present, you want to avoid killing innocents whenever possible...

But the bottom line is your people are more important than the enemies friendlies/noncombatants. You have to place your unit, your country, and your allies above the livelyhood of your enemies innocents, or you will lose. Period. If you start making judgement calls that cost you the lives of your men because youre putting the lives of their innocents ahead of your own troops, youve lost.

Because theyll use them against you. And now youve given away a deadly advantage to the enemy.

[Var City]

As i said, his idealogical purity is respectable...

But hes naiive to think you can win wars while believing as he does.

Wars take a cold precise logical thinking to ensure minimal friendly casualties while ensuring the comolete destruction of your foe.

A certain amount of humanity has to be present, you want to avoid killing innocents whenever possible...

But the bottom line is your people are more important than the enemies friendlies/noncombatants. You have to place your unit, your country, and your allies above the livelyhood of your enemies innocents, or you will lose. Period. If you start making judgement calls that cost you the lives of your men because youre putting the lives of their innocents ahead of your own troops, youve lost.

Because theyll use them against you. And now youve given away a deadly advantage to the enemy.

epic post

[Voice of Doom]

I am tired and sick of war. Its glory is all moonshine. It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, for vengeance, for desolation. - General Sherman

[headhuntersix]

Thanks.  You would feel differently if it was your son or brother being beheaded.  It is the sanctimonious thinking and better than thou attitudes of people like you that is allowing this pestilence to spread. You do not understand how to combat pure unadulterated evil and so I can't blame you  for thinking and feeling the way you do.

shocks post was good...but the answer is simple....u kill them. These people aren't rational. You step on the neck until they're done.

[OTHstrong]

West Point graduates have accounted for a higher percentage of U.S. military combat deaths in the post-9/11 war on terrorism than in all but one major American conflict since the academy’s founding in 1802.

Between this fact and my permanently maimed nephew I can address this. If we are going to fight then we have to fight on even ground with the enemy.  Rules of engagement need to change and we need to stop vilifying soldiers sent to do a job. If I lost a family member it would simply strengthen my resolve to beat down the enemy and piss on their graves.

US soldiers are not trained to be political we are trained to defeat and enemy plain and simple.

My nephew at age 19.  A getbigger through and through.

I agree entirely

[OTHstrong]

You're part of the problem. Save your bleeding heart faggotry for the classroom.

oh you rebel you, lmao certified badass over here 

 

[OTHstrong]

As i said, his idealogical purity is respectable...

But hes naiive to think you can win wars while believing as he does.

Wars take a cold precise logical thinking to ensure minimal friendly casualties while ensuring the comolete destruction of your foe.

A certain amount of humanity has to be present, you want to avoid killing innocents whenever possible...

But the bottom line is your people are more important than the enemies friendlies/noncombatants. You have to place your unit, your country, and your allies above the livelyhood of your enemies innocents, or you will lose. Period. If you start making judgement calls that cost you the lives of your men because youre putting the lives of their innocents ahead of your own troops, youve lost.

Because theyll use them against you. And now youve given away a deadly advantage to the enemy.

well no shit sherlock

you guys are a bunch of morons, lmao, I am naive because I don't want to use 50 nukes on a region, seriously dude are you sane. I am against politics to the disgraceful degree they are represented and collateral damage is a fucken must 100 times more then it is now and like WW said in his post rules of engagement need to change, fuck ya they do, let the soldier do their job, so WTF IS THIS NAIVE YOU SPEAK OF? did I miss something here cause I have no fucken clue what you are babbling ABOUT, WHAT  


My only ideology as you put it is to not use weapons that will kill 100 times more civilians then actual soldiers. You try to act like you know war and military and here you are stating it is being naive to oppose killing 100 civilians to 1 soldier cause that is what a nuke would do. Fuck sake if 50 civilians die while killing 100 enemy soldiers, fuck I am game for that all day long. Don't fucken make me out to look like  that,... WTF

[The Ugly]

well no shit sherlock

you guys are a bunch of morons, lmao, I am naive because I don't want to use 50 nukes on a region, seriously dude are you sane. I am against politics to the disgraceful degree they are represented and collateral damage is a fucken must 100 times more then it is now and like WW said in his post rules of engagement need to change, fuck ya they do, let the soldier do their job, so WTF IS THIS NAIVE YOU SPEAK OF? did I miss something here cause I have no fucken clue what you are babbling ABOUT, WHAT  


My only ideology as you put it is to not use weapons that will kill 100 times more civilians then actual soldiers. You try to act like you know war and military and here you are stating it is being naive to oppose killing 100 civilians to 1 soldier cause that is what a nuke would do. Fuck sake if 50 civilians die while killing 100 enemy soldiers, fuck I am game for that all day long. Don't fucken make me out to look like  that,... WTF

One American soldier isn't worth the entire Middle East population (minus Israelis). But only "pussies" use their superior technology against inferior humans, right, Noam? You're an apologist for third world barbarian jihadists. A fucking disgrace to civilized Western democracy.

[SF1900]

One American soldier isn't worth the entire Middle East population (minus Israelis). But only "pussies" use their superior technology against inferior humans, right, Noam? You're an apologist for third world barbarian jihadists. A fucking disgrace to civilized Western democracy.

It seems like hes an apologist for innocent women and children. I never got the impression that he was an apologist for barbaric jihadists.

[OTHstrong]

One American soldier isn't worth the entire Middle East population (minus Israelis). But only "pussies" use their superior technology against inferior humans, right, Noam? You're an apologist for third world barbarian jihadists. A fucking disgrace to civilized Western democracy.

LIKE I SAID, ANOTHER TOUGH GUY OVER HERE