I'm no military stragitist
So that would mean to do WHATEVER IT TAKES.
I'm 100% cool with people shitting on obama or his policy.
But he's talked to the Joint chiefs, he has WAY more intel than we ever will, he knows way more about their location and numbers and vulnerabilities than we do.
Obama may not be a military strategist, but he has the best strategists IN THE WORLD giving him advice. And he says 500 specialists (that he's admitting) and air strikes will do the job. I think obama sucks, but not for this.
numbers wise, a classic overwhelming battle win would require 200,000 to 300,000 troops for a mess of " 20,000 and 31,500 fighters". But they're a relatively small group, and it sounds like the top military minds in the world say 500 guys researching/calling in airstrikes, and a shitload of firepower from the air CAN get the job done.
I'm no military stragitist and the closest one that I could think of on here would be HH6. But since the first priority of the president is to protect the country. So that would mean to do WHATEVER IT TAKES. But since we don't really have a president. I don't see much happening. Hopefully I'm wrong.
Um, how do you know that "whatever it takes" doesn't mean tons of airstrikes and the expertise of 500 special forces? Do you have any idea how much damage the USA could do to 30,000 men with
1) unlimited $, training, weapons - they're the best of the best
2) unlimited air support
3) support from the nations govts where ISIS is hiding out?
I think you're criticizing his ISIS policy on strictly reflex here lol.