worse then expected

[Necrosis]

http://www.neomatica.com/2014/10/06/southern-hemisphere-analysis-reveals-global-warming-underestimated-24-58/


Actually warming is actually at least 28% worse then we accounted for.

[Natural Man]

and what you or anyone on this planet is going to do about it?


Nufin.

[Simple Simon]

I will be dead before it gets too hot


So fuck it.

[_aj_]

And yet each year gets colder. Amazing.

[Necrosis]

and what you or anyone on this planet is going to do about it?


Nufin.

that's a good attitude, you sound like a real winner.

[Shockwave]

I will be dead before it gets too hot


So fuck it.

x2


Still.dont buy the doom and gloom stuff. The earths climate changes cyclically on a level we barely can comprehend. Im sure we have something to do with it changing a little quicker but i still doubt well have any way to do more harm to the earth than natural causes.

We humans are arrogant things, thinking we need to stop all natures changes, cant let animals go extinct that may have otherwise, cant let climate change that may have otherwise,..... if we werent around this shit would still happen. Maybe not as drastically but the climate would still change, soecies would still did out, other species would evolve and take their place..... its nature.

[Necrosis]

x2


Still.dont buy the doom and gloom stuff. The earths climate changes cyclically on a level we barely can comprehend. Im sure we have something to do with it changing a little quicker but i still doubt well have any way to do more harm to the earth than natural causes.

We humans are arrogant things, thinking we need to stop all natures changes, cant let animals go extinct that may have otherwise, cant let climate change that may have otherwise,..... if we werent around this shit would still happen. Maybe not as drastically but the climate would still change, soecies would still did out, other species would evolve and take their place..... its nature.

This is not true though, climatologists understand it really well, this is why I think you have a issue with it, you assume that they only know as much as you for some reason, I am sure you don't know how your cell phone works but a physicist could explain it in great detail.

It's us, the natural cycle has been broken, we broke it, just like we broke evolution, infections etc. we are circumventing all natrual processes, hence this in not natural. We are altering the natural world, dramatically, no other species does this. It is unprecendented.

[Shockwave]

This is not true though, climatologists understand it really well, this is why I think you have a issue with it, you assume that they only know as much as you for some reason, I am sure you don't know how your cell phone works but a physicist could explain it in great detail.

It's us, the natural cycle has been broken, we broke it, just like we broke evolution, infections etc. we are circumventing all natrual processes, hence this in not natural. We are altering the natural world, dramatically, no other species does this. It is unprecendented.

Dude, they only have recorded data for a couple hundred years, and after that, it gets foggier and foggier as it goes back. They can make educated guesses what it was like thousands of years ago, but theyre still educated guesses.... not hard data.

[Necrosis]

Dude, they only have recorded data for a couple hundred years, and after that, it gets foggier and foggier as it goes back. They can make educated guesses what it was like thousands of years ago, but theyre still educated guesses.... not hard data.

Ice cores and trees offer very accurate data, just like fossils provide evidence of evolution, just because something happened a long time ago doesn't mean we can't accurately measure it, ice cores show the atmospheric composition perfectly, we then can map the sun's cycles, we know the cycles of weather and large phenomenon like el nino etc. It's alot more accurate then you are letting on.

So which part do you dispute? that the globe is heating up or that we are the cause? or is it something else, srs question.

[_aj_]

Ice cores and trees offer very accurate data

[ProudVirgin69]

Ice cores and trees offer very accurate data, just like fossils provide evidence of evolution, just because something happened a long time ago doesn't mean we can't accurately measure it, ice cores show the atmospheric composition perfectly, we then can map the sun's cycles, we know the cycles of weather and large phenomenon like el nino etc. It's alot more accurate then you are letting on.

So which part do you dispute? that the globe is heating up or that we are the cause? or is it something else, srs question.

Well, I'm no scientist, but it's been getting colder around my area....reckon it might even snow this year.  Doesn't sound much like "global warming" to me. 

[Grape Ape]

and what you or anyone on this planet is going to do about it?

Looks like the answer is "whine about it on a bodybuilding message board".

[polychronopolous]

Ice cores and trees offer very accurate data, just like fossils provide evidence of evolution, just because something happened a long time ago doesn't mean we can't accurately measure it, ice cores show the atmospheric composition perfectly, we then can map the sun's cycles, we know the cycles of weather and large phenomenon like el nino etc. It's alot more accurate then you are letting on.

So which part do you dispute? that the globe is heating up or that we are the cause? or is it something else, srs question.

You reading all these replies, bro?

That's a bunch of people not taking you serious.

[Shockwave]

Ice cores and trees offer very accurate data, just like fossils provide evidence of evolution, just because something happened a long time ago doesn't mean we can't accurately measure it, ice cores show the atmospheric composition perfectly, we then can map the sun's cycles, we know the cycles of weather and large phenomenon like el nino etc. It's alot more accurate then you are letting on.

So which part do you dispute? that the globe is heating up or that we are the cause? or is it something else, srs question.

I dont believe the amount that theyre saying is cause by us.

I have no doubt that we contribute, as pur technology emits greenhouse gasses, but i dont believe were liable to the extent the hysterics want us to believe.

The reason im so skeptical is because of the money driving these researchers...... because the people funding them stand to gain hundreds of billions from forcing us to fundamentally change the way we live.

These investors and politicians dont give a flying fuck about the earth, they just see the money and power. Thats why they threw billions at climate research and also why so many got in trouble a few years sgo for falsifying data.

[_bruce_]

Interesting, so that is the reason why chem-trails are dearly needed - to get some cool on.
Climate is influenced by many factors, one of them is humans and their "farts".
I do want to preserve nature but I do not want to be towed into U.N. directed 3rd world tribalism because of being in a "chauvinist" 1st world country.
I'm interested in local and useful tactics not globalist agendas.

[Shockwave]

Interesting, so that is the reason why chem-trails are dearly needed - to get some cool on.
Climate is influenced by many factors, one of them is humans and their "farts".
I do want to preserve nature but I do not want to be towed into U.N. directed 3rd world tribalism because of being in a "chauvinist" 1st world country.
I'm interested in local and useful tactics not globalist agendas.

Bingo bango.

The people driving this agenda are fucking corruot scumbags whos goal is to fundamentally change the way we live, so they can have more money and power. Biggest reason why in so skeptical.

Im sure most of the scientists intentions are pure, but the people driving it, are not

[_bruce_]

Bingo bango.

The people driving this agenda are fucking corruot scumbags whos goal is to fundamentally change the way we live, so they can have more money and power. Biggest reason why in so skeptical.

Im sure most of the scientists intentions are pure, but the people driving it, are not

Totally agree.
Such issues need to be set straight and ones position is a lot clearer when people grasp the reason for being pro or against something.

Being against globally coordinated climate "preservation" has to do with damage control and not wanting the planet to die or simply not caring.
We're being led down a path of dis-empowerment and self denial by remote control elitists who make use of the herd mentality that the "in crowd" represents.

[Necrosis]

You reading all these replies, bro?

That's a bunch of people not taking you serious.

Lol, par for the course.

[Viking11]

And yet each year gets colder. Amazing.

Really?   Where?  Not globally.

[Coach is Back!]

http://www.neomatica.com/2014/10/06/southern-hemisphere-analysis-reveals-global-warming-underestimated-24-58/


Actually warming is actually at least 28% worse then we accounted for.

How much should I make the check out for?















*dumbass libs

[Hulkotron]

I clicked on this thread expecting pics of the trainer.

[Coach is Back!]

I clicked on this thread expecting pics of the trainer.

This thread is just as real as the trainer.

[Necrosis]

Bingo bango.

The people driving this agenda are fucking corruot scumbags whos goal is to fundamentally change the way we live, so they can have more money and power. Biggest reason why in so skeptical.

Im sure most of the scientists intentions are pure, but the people driving it, are not

The whole world are scumbags, your theory falls apart when you consider that 98% of scientists over teh WHOLE WORLD agree, surely they aren't all lying scumbags? or not all liberal? or not all religious, some muslim etc. This is not how science works, you are actiing like it's politics, it's not, there are facts and we all have to live with them.

[Necrosis]

How much should I make the check out for?















*dumbass libs

98% of scientists in the world are liberal obvioulsy.

[_aj_]

This is not how science works, you are actiing like it's politics, it's not, there are facts and we all have to live with them.

Stop being obtuse on this. The "science" of AGW has always been rife with politics. To suggest otherwise is to prove ignorance or malice.