yep, the conservative judge who approved the first voter ID law now does a complete 180 and lays out the facts of his error and I choose to look at it and you choose to completely ignore every fact that he has presented
hilarious
yes, thats totally what happened. Because 1 conservative judge and a couple shitbag republicans have an opiniom i should just totally flip my opinion because some shitheads whine about having to show ID to fucking vote.
Wah. Your argument has next to no logical backing, its basically
'eligable voters wont vote if they have to show ID and a conservative judge think its unfair, so you should too
Oh, and a couple republicans hope that it DOES suppress votes so therefore is merits invalidated."
It makes no logical sense. If those people are too fckn lazy to get an ID or proof of identity then IMO they dont deserve to vote.
I couldnt care less if they were republicans refusing to vote if they hd to show ID, if you cant prove your identity you dont fucking vote. There is no logical argument against that. Ever other argument ive seen is just grasping at straws to justify why people shouldnt have to orove who they are to vote.