Author Topic: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.  (Read 7618 times)

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
this is a thread for those of you who diet yet perform strenuous cardio several times a week. it's a thread about increasing / maintaining your performance while losing bf. it sounds simple but it isn't. a lot of times increasing your performace w carbs means impacting fat loss because you take in too many carbs/ cals to lose weight but you also don't want to be dragging ass on your bike/ on the court/ in the gym etc.

if you're an average gym rat you'll find all this unnecessary but it might also help you. this is geared for highly active people.

I had someone email me for advise regarding weight loss while striking a balance with optimal performance in a HIT cardio activity, in this case cycling.

the keys here are weight loss and optimal performance- striking that balance.

too many carbs/ cals will greatly improve your ability to perform prolonged HIT cardio but I will stall fat loss. too little cals/ carbs will find you performing like shit but you'll lose weight. the idea is finding that middle ground where you can do both.

it's not as easy as 'I'll just eat as much as I think I need and the cardio I do will burn it off' think of all the fat guys you see on road bikes. even the skinny guys who ride ultra km a week are skinny fat. I know a guy who bangs out 200km rides on a weekend and he's got a huge pot belly.

we want to have the ability to perform like that, but lose fat not accumulate it. that would be the holy grail of these pursuits I would think. so how do we get there?

the idea is to be able to perform that same level of work and kill it, meanwhile not take in so many cals you get fat. we don't want to be fat. we want to be shredded.

the key of course is supplying your body w enough food to do the work required but not so much that it kill yours attempts to lean out.

there's an app for runners and cyclists called strava. it's free. it measures your distances, elevations and cal expenditure based on body weight.

all of you out there who find what I'm talking about of interest download the app or any other kind of app that will allow you to track calorie expenditure based on activity level given your own personal conditions ie bodyweight etc

the next time you ride/ run/ shoot hoops / or perform any other HIT cardio based activity take the number of cals you've burned into consideration when you plan your eating after.

instead of randomly eating which will fuck you up- look around you at all the HIT cardio guys who have high bf levels- control your food intake based on the cals you burned.

for example. when I ride I typically burn 600-1k cal an hr based on my weight an elevations rode. the meal I eat after that ride will strictly go to replenishing gylcogen. that's all I want to do so I can perform optimally next ride. take the number of cals and eat those cals in carbs. so if I burn off 1000cal I'm going to take in 250grm carbs over and above what would normally be my carb intake for the day. this is not the whole of May carbs for the day this is in addition to since we should already be in a deficit if trying to lose bf. since my cals are based on my weight this will be ball park only be used I hold much more muscle mass than I do fat so I'm going to burn thru more glycogen than a pure weight x time of activity= cals burned formula for replenishing glycogen so beware of that.

now this is purely experimental. I don't know if it'll work but it's certainly a jumping off point for those of us looking to lose weight and get shredded and perform optimally. I'll be trying it as soon as the weather here clears up enough here to ride.

there are several factors which may impact the amount of carbs needed over and above the amount needed replenish the cals burned during the ride. for example the role of metabolism for the hours after. that will burn cals/ carbs. carbs needed to replenish. so be wary of that.

I think there can be awesome performace while in a cal deficit and losing weight. we just gotta strike a balance and I think this is as good a start as any.
b

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2014, 10:16:15 AM »
I'm hoping this generates some good discussion.

I'm sure disgusted can chime in. I know he knows based on lean tissue how many carbs a person will need to achieve glycogen replenishment to fill the muscle out for a show from last weeks depletion  so hopefully he can chime in.

the idea is to totally replenish, still have the ability to do extreme amounts of cardio but still lose bf.

 
b

Thin Lizzy

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18452
  • It’s all a fraud
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2014, 01:18:48 PM »
About 1/3 of the Glycogen burned gets recycled. So, a 1 for 1 replenishment would put you in a surplus.


Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2014, 01:58:48 PM »
this is a thread for those of you who diet yet perform strenuous cardio several times a week. it's a thread about increasing / maintaining your performance while losing bf. it sounds simple but it isn't. a lot of times increasing your performace w carbs means impacting fat loss because youdtake in too many carbs/ cals to lose weight but you also don't want to be dragging ass on your bike/ on the court/ in the gym etc.

if you're an average gym rat you'll find all this unnecessary but it might also help you. this is geared for highly active people.

I had someone email me for advise regarding weight loss while striking a balance with optimal performance in a HIT cardio activity, in this case cycling.

the keys here are weight loss and optimal performance- striking that balance.

too many carbs/ cals will greatly improve your ability to perform prolonged HIT cardio but I will stall fat loss. too little cals/ carbs will find you performing like shit but you'll lose weight. the idea is finding that middle ground where you can do both.

it's not as easy as 'I'll just eat as much as I think I need and the cardio I do will burn it off' think of all the fat guys you see on road bikes. even the skinny guys who ride ultra km a week are skinny fat. I know a guy who bangs out 200km rides on a weekend and he's got a huge pot belly.

we want to have the ability to perform like that, but lose fat not accumulate it. that would be the holy grail of these pursuits I would think. so how do we get there?

the idea is to be able to perform that same level of work and kill it, meanwhile not take in so many cals you get fat. we don't want to be fat. we want to be shredded.

the key of course is supplying your body w enough food to do the work required but not so much that it kill yours attempts to lean out.

there's an app for runners and cyclists called strava. it's free. it measures your distances, elevations and cal expenditure based on body weight.

all of you out there who find what I'm talking about of interest download the app or any other kind of app that will allow you to track calorie expenditure based on activity level given your own personal conditions ie bodyweight etc

the next time you ride/ run/ shoot hoops / or perform any other HIT cardio based activity take the number of cals you've burned into consideration when you plan your eating after.

instead of randomly eating which will fuck you up- look around you at all the HIT cardio guys who have high bf levels- control your food intake based on the cals you burned.

for example. when I ride I typically burn 600-1k cal an hr based on my weight an elevations rode. the meal I eat after that ride will strictly go to replenishing gylcogen. that's all I want to do so I can perform optimally next ride. take the number of cals and eat those cals in carbs. so if I burn off 1000cal I'm going to take in 250grm carbs over and above what would normally be my carb intake for the day. this is not the whole of May carbs for the day this is in addition to since we should already be in a deficit if trying to lose bf. since my cals are based on my weight this will be ball park only be used I hold much more muscle mass than I do fat so I'm going to burn thru more glycogen than a pure weight x time of activity= cals burned formula for replenishing glycogen so beware of that.

now this is purely experimental. I don't know if it'll work but it's certainly a jumping off point for those of us looking to lose weight and get shredded and perform optimally. I'll be trying it as soon as the weather here clears up enough here to ride.

there are several factors which may impact the amount of carbs needed over and above the amount needed replenish the cals burned during the ride. for example the role of metabolism for the hours after. that will burn cals/ carbs. carbs needed to replenish. so be wary of that.

I think there can be awesome performace while in a cal deficit and losing weight. we just gotta strike a balance and I think this is as good a start as any.
interesting. I started running again, and incorporating more of an intensive 'less weight, stop counting and just rep to failure' style program... i hit 2 body parts a day, 4 exercises per bodypart and 4 sets per exercise, sometimes up to 25 reps depending on weight.

 Afterwards i run 3 miles at a pace thats about 90% of max effort.

I do this everday i lift except the day after leg day.

Ive naturally started taking in more carbs, but i throttled it at 200g where my coach wants it, and im seeing much more dramatic changes day to day.

Reason for this change is because im starting to get back into combat sports, tactical shooting competitions, and i want to have good endurance and athletic performance while trying to continue to drop BF. Also i just like being able to run, jump, move weight, and be effective.

Its very satisfying, but i always am feeling like my body wants me to up the carbs on a huge level. Im always fighting it. Like i said, i have it capped at 200g/day right now, and its ok, but as i drop BF im supposed to drop carbs, and i feel like as i increase the tempo and intensity of my training, ill start dragging ass.

Uncle Joon

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2290
  • I'm back
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2014, 02:14:54 PM »
I think trying to achieve maximum performance in sports while simultaneously losing body fat (not necessarily just body weight) through trying to balance carbohydrate and calorie intake is extremely difficult to achieve from a psychological point of view and very difficult to manage and not fuck up.

For me personally carbs will always increase my performance of HIIT no doubt....trouble is once my performance is increased so are by cravings for more and more carbs so fat loss totally stalls but my functionality and performances increases.

Conversely when I cut down carbs, or better still cut them out altogether I lose fat very quick but I just feel like total shit and performance goes way down.

Best I ever looked (crappiest I ever felt also) i did ZERO cardio, just weights on zero carb diet.

For me personally I just know achieving that middle ground is next to impossible realistically.

It's either one goal (performance) or the other (fatloss) for aesthetics through periodization depending on what is more important to achieve at the time

I am just NOT gonna do say really hardcore HIT and be able to consume say just lousy 30g of carbs after and be able to control not eating more.

It's like sticking your dick on tip of a hot young pussy with a massive erection but not being able to penetrate it...total cock tease.
10/10 times your dicks gonna go in, just like your gonna over eat on carbs when doing lots of HIIT.





 

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #5 on: October 17, 2014, 02:17:59 PM »
I'm hoping this generates some good discussion.

I'm sure disgusted can chime in. I know he knows based on lean tissue how many carbs a person will need to achieve glycogen replenishment to fill the muscle out for a show from last weeks depletion  so hopefully he can chime in.

the idea is to totally replenish, still have the ability to do extreme amounts of cardio but still lose bf.

 
If you are cutting water, you can eat all the carbs you want and you will never fill out properly.

The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2014, 02:21:46 PM »
The Low Carb theory is one that works, but not necessary in my opinion.  The absolutely most ripped human being I have ever seen or read about, all follow higher calorie, high carbs- 2400-4000 dieting for shows.  These are Lifetime Naturals mind you.  Not saying low carb won`t work, it does, but its not necessary.


The True Adonis

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 50229
  • Fear is proof of a degenerate mind.
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2014, 02:24:40 PM »





Another good example of this is Devon Palombo, another Lifetime Natty.  He will diet on extremely high calories and stays lean.  He even eats 21,000 calories, 10,000 quite frequently and nothing happens.

[ Invalid YouTube link ]
[ Invalid YouTube link ]
[ Invalid YouTube link ]

the trainer

  • Guest
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2014, 02:28:36 PM »
No One why is it that all your threads must be a fucking wall of text you are such a meathead you cannot explain yourself in simple sentences, or maybe you have being watching too many kai green interviews on you tube.

gracie bjj

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7101
  • Getbig!
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2014, 02:33:34 PM »
I think trying to achieve maximum performance in sports while simultaneously losing body fat (not necessarily just body weight) through trying to balance carbohydrate and calorie intake is extremely difficult to achieve from a psychological point of view and very difficult to manage and not fuck up.

For me personally carbs will always increase my performance of HIIT no doubt....trouble is once my performance is increased so are by cravings for more and more carbs so fat totally stalls but my functionality and performances increases.

Conversely when I cut down carbs, or better still cut them out altogether I lose fat very quick but I just feel like total shit and performance goes way down.

same here the low carb to zero carb gets me sliced but im as weak as a kitten and i have no energy to even do simple things around the house,feel like im gonna pass out at times from fatigue.it does work tho but man the tiredness and low energy kills me

Best I ever looked (crappiest I ever felt also) i did ZERO cardio, just weights on zero carb diet.

For me personally I just know achieving that middle ground is next to impossible realistically.

It's either one goal (performance) or the other (fatloss) through periodization depending on what is more important to achieve at the time

I am just NOT gonna do say really hardcore HIT and be able to consume say just lousy 30g of carbs after and be able to control not eating more.

It's like sticking your dick on tip of a hot young pussy with a massive erection but not being able to penetrate it...total cock tease.
10/10 times your dicks gonna go in, just like your gonna over eat on carbs.





 
R

Coach is Back!

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 61489
  • It’s All Bullshit
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #10 on: October 17, 2014, 02:40:10 PM »
If you are cutting water, you can eat all the carbs you want and you will never fill out properly.

You never want to cut water just for the sake of losing weight. I even have my fighters and wrestlers drinking water the day of weigh ins.

oldtimer1

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18124
  • Getbig!
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #11 on: October 17, 2014, 02:56:04 PM »
Cutting water is insanity. It will kill endurance and could be harmful to health.

I think everyone makes this stuff just too complicated. If being a scientist was necessary to be a bodybuilder then the Olympia stage would be empty. The old story is when we developed our space program the US spent a crazy amount of money engineering a pressurized pen because with the lack of gravity a regular pen wouldn't work. The Soviets sent their astronauts ups with a pencil.

Monitoring carbs obsessively in a computer program or a journal is nuts. If you are doing a lot of cardio endurance you need carbs. I know I will get slammed for this with this new age pseudo scientific info but monitor your calories.

  Regarding cardio I find a mix of intervals and distance works for me. I run 2 to 5 miles when I run distance. I try to throw in something like 8 sets of 400 meters fast runs with a 200 meter walk between sets.  Doing a longer distance works too like 6 x 800 with a 400 meter jog rest interval. If you don't have a track most commercial treadmills go down to a 5 minute pace which is plenty fast enough for most. If you're healthy and young try on your off lifting days to do something like 8 sets of 440 yards or 400 meters on a treadmill at 8-7 minute pace per mile. Try to work down from there but don't make every interval day a torture day to beat your last time. If you have a track you can use that would be ideal.

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29892
  • Expunged
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #12 on: October 17, 2014, 02:58:01 PM »
As one of the bigger guys I don't normally concern myself with the affairs of small men.

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #13 on: October 17, 2014, 06:30:51 PM »
About 1/3 of the Glycogen burned gets recycled. So, a 1 for 1 replenishment would put you in a surplus.



this is the type of thing i was hoping to find man, thanks for posting this.

so basically you can safely cut 1/3 the carbs off you total you 'think' you'll need to replenish..
b

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #14 on: October 17, 2014, 06:36:04 PM »
interesting. I started running again, and incorporating more of an intensive 'less weight, stop counting and just rep to failure' style program... i hit 2 body parts a day, 4 exercises per bodypart and 4 sets per exercise, sometimes up to 25 reps depending on weight.

 Afterwards i run 3 miles at a pace thats about 90% of max effort.

I do this everday i lift except the day after leg day.

Ive naturally started taking in more carbs, but i throttled it at 200g where my coach wants it, and im seeing much more dramatic changes day to day.

Reason for this change is because im starting to get back into combat sports, tactical shooting competitions, and i want to have good endurance and athletic performance while trying to continue to drop BF. Also i just like being able to run, jump, move weight, and be effective.

Its very satisfying, but i always am feeling like my body wants me to up the carbs on a huge level. Im always fighting it. Like i said, i have it capped at 200g/day right now, and its ok, but as i drop BF im supposed to drop carbs, and i feel like as i increase the tempo and intensity of my training, ill start dragging ass.

ya man this is what its all about for those of us who want to carry maximal tissue, minimal bf and preform optimally.

i think the feeling your body is going thru is the same one we all go thru- we've overfed our bodies for decades now we take those cals away. the body hates that. it wants regulation. it hates change. so its the same thing w any diet. your body is making demands for cals it just doesnt need.

just see where you are when you start dropping carbs as you drop fat. ive noticed in myself it doesnt take very many carbs to make a huge difference from dragging ass to being highly functional. in myself i have noticed when fully depleted i can turn that feeling around w about 120 grams of carbs.
b

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #15 on: October 17, 2014, 06:41:29 PM »
If you are cutting water, you can eat all the carbs you want and you will never fill out properly.

nobody is cutting water lets not put that in the mix. this is about performance not looking pretty on a stage. cutting water would impair performance more than anything i can think of along side of cutting carbs/ cals and sodium.

plus i dont think we want to fill out. that seems to me were almost too close to going over how many carbs we need. id rather be depelted, keep burning fat and perform otiamlly than be full and do the same cause its a fine line between being full and taking in too many carbs/ cals.

keep in mind this is sports performance oriented, while trying to lose bf.

if it was just that cardio aspect of it that causes bf loss these cyclists etc would be shredded. theres more to it than doing cardio. imo the diet will be 100% of how much fat loss you'll experience in this application.
b

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #16 on: October 17, 2014, 06:50:10 PM »
Cutting water is insanity. It will kill endurance and could be harmful to health.

I think everyone makes this stuff just too complicated. If being a scientist was necessary to be a bodybuilder then the Olympia stage would be empty. The old story is when we developed our space program the US spent a crazy amount of money engineering a pressurized pen because with the lack of gravity a regular pen wouldn't work. The Soviets sent their astronauts ups with a pencil.

Monitoring carbs obsessively in a computer program or a journal is nuts. If you are doing a lot of cardio endurance you need carbs. I know I will get slammed for this with this new age pseudo scientific info but monitor your calories.

  Regarding cardio I find a mix of intervals and distance works for me. I run 2 to 5 miles when I run distance. I try to throw in something like 8 sets of 400 meters fast runs with a 200 meter walk between sets.  Doing a longer distance works too like 6 x 800 with a 400 meter jog rest interval. If you don't have a track most commercial treadmills go down to a 5 minute pace which is plenty fast enough for most. If you're healthy and young try on your off lifting days to do something like 8 sets of 440 yards or 400 meters on a treadmill at 8-7 minute pace per mile. Try to work down from there but don't make every interval day a torture day to beat your last time. If you have a track you can use that would be ideal.

well. i dont think its nuts to try to find a better way. if theres a technology out there that can help us we have to use it. at the end of the day fat loss comes down to numbers. you have to know how many cals you are taking in, you cant guess it. guessing it leads to failure. so if theres a tech that helps us estimate cals burned, watts etc that we can use to find that balance then im all for it.

that being said look at typical endurance athletes who rely on high carbs to perform work. they arent shredded and full of muscle. they are typically skinny fat.

we dont want that. there is a balance here that can be struck.

nobody can slam the 'monitor your calories' i agree w you whole heartedly. the trick is to get enough cals/ carbs every day to perform the same day after day while losing bodyfat. this is where the catch is.

i have asked someone who knows a great deal about energy requirements for cycling im hoping he chimes in here. theres def a path we can find here in getting to 5-6%bf and killing it on the performance end. once you are there, just like with holding tissue, itll be much easier to maintain than it would to get there.
b

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #17 on: October 17, 2014, 06:51:44 PM »
As one of the bigger guys I don't normally concern myself with the affairs of small men.

:D i notice a lot of similarity between you and chiro in your humour. thats a good thing btw.
b

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29892
  • Expunged
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #18 on: October 17, 2014, 06:52:49 PM »
:D i notice a lot of similarity between you and chiro in your humour. thats a good thing btw.

BCF is a great man yes

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #19 on: October 17, 2014, 06:59:40 PM »
BCF is a great man yes

i have learned to lower my tone in his presence.
b

no one

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11917
  • have i hurt your feelings?
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #20 on: October 17, 2014, 11:06:53 PM »
how does fasting factor in? hit cardio/training while fasted and staying fasted afterward? are glycogen/cals depleted moreso?

low carb/keto/cal restriction have enormous health benefits, but i completely agree that hit performance, including strength training, suffers without proper and regular glycogen restoration. keto makes me sluggish and weak, but >75g/day carbs kicks me out, stalling fat loss. weekly carb ups super compensate but then im back in keto for too much of the week (typically 40hrs later). low cal i have amazing energy, high cal i feel drained.

there must be a medium.

if your doing an HIT cardio you'll know when your depleted. esp cycling. your legs will feel empty. there's no other word I can use describe it. so staying fasted won't deplete gylcogen stores further. once they are empty they are empty.

so when to eat. the body will re uptake nutrients and use them efficiently no matter when they are taken. that's why the anabolic window is such a crock of shit- my body isn't going to say 'oh protein. great. I needed this 2 hours ago so I'm not going to use it now' lol fuck it'll take what you give it and do what it needs to do to survive. so for muscle building imo when to eat after being depleted doesn't matter in the slightest. and forget going catabolic. if it was that easy to go catabolic and lose tissue we would have died out in the cave man days when they went days w/o food.

so for fat loss. when dieting I try to stay fasted as long as I can after I exercise. I dont want anything impacting my ability to burn fat. eating releases insulin which inhibits fat burning.

so for performance. once I fill my glycogen stores I switch to protein / fats. I don't need more carbs at this point since I've replenished lost stores. typically after I eat my last carb meal I can go thru 2 full body workouts and roughly 36 hours or so before I exhaust those stores again- that's when I get the waking under water feeling. then I'll switch back to carbs protein till I start feeling that my energy demands are being met. then it's back to protein fats. keep in mind this is all in a calorie deficit. cycling I can go usually 1.5-2 hrs fasted before I burn out.

now the why would I switch from carbs to fat back to carbs back to fat etc and go thru that energy lag. because as I told TA I'd rather remain semi depleted and burning fat than have excess glycogen in my body. excess glycogen turns to fat if it's not used for fuel. so if I'm eating carbs constantly and I have full glycogen stores and great energy levels sooner or later excess glycogen will hamper my ability to lose fat. how to you know you have excess glycogen? you don't. lol that's the bitch of it. so the fail safe then is to fill out, switch to fats until you start to feel the energy lag, then add carbs back in. it's a fool proof way of knowing where your body is all the time and giving it exactly what it needs when it needs it as opposed to blindly consuming macros.

works for me anyway.
b

ENZO

  • Competitors
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 966
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #21 on: October 17, 2014, 11:47:22 PM »
if your doing an HIT cardio you'll know when your depleted. esp cycling. your legs will feel empty. there's no other word I can use describe it. so staying fasted won't deplete gylcogen stores further. once they are empty they are empty.

so when to eat. the body will re uptake nutrients and use them efficiently no matter when they are taken. that's why the anabolic window is such a crock of shit- my body isn't going to say 'oh protein. great. I needed this 2 hours ago so I'm not going to use it now' lol fuck it'll take what you give it and do what it needs to do to survive. so for muscle building imo when to eat after being depleted doesn't matter in the slightest. and forget going catabolic. if it was that easy to go catabolic and lose tissue we would have died out in the cave man days when they went days w/o food.

so for fat loss. when dieting I try to stay fasted as long as I can after I exercise. I dont want anything impacting my ability to burn fat. eating releases insulin which inhibits fat burning thru a process called lypolisis.

so for performance. once I fill my glycogen stores I switch to protein / fats. I don't need more carbs at this point since I've replenished lost stores. typically after I eat my last carb meal I can go thru 2 full body workouts and roughly 36 hours or so before I exhaust those stores again- that's when I get the waking under water feeling. then I'll switch back to carbs protein till I start feeling that my energy demands are being met. then it's back to protein fats. keep in mind this is all in a calorie deficit. cycling I can go usually 1.5-2 hrs fasted before I burn out.

now the why would I switch from carbs to fat back to carbs back to fat etc and go thru that energy lag. because as I told TA I'd rather remain semi depleted and burning fat than have excess glycogen in my body. excess glycogen turns to fat if it's not used for fuel. so if I'm eating carbs constantly and I have full glycogen stores and great energy levels sooner or later excess glycogen will hamper my ability to lose fat. how to you know you have excess glycogen? you don't. lol that's the bitch of it. so the fail safe then is to fill out, switch to fats until you start to feel the energy lag, then add carbs back in. it's a fool proof way of knowing where your body is all the time and giving it exactly what it needs when it needs it as opposed to blindly consuming macros.

works for me anyway.

I like this. I know my body instinctively enough to know when to cut back carbs or raise fats, but this sounds like a good baseline.

Mayday

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2999
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #22 on: October 19, 2014, 03:47:15 PM »
that being said look at typical endurance athletes who rely on high carbs to perform work. they arent shredded and full of muscle. they are typically skinny fat.

i have asked someone who knows a great deal about energy requirements for cycling im hoping he chimes in here. theres def a path we can find here in getting to 5-6%bf and killing it on the performance end. once you are there, just like with holding tissue, itll be much easier to maintain than it would to get there.

Hi no one!

From what i remember the marathon runners aren't ripped because of the cortisol that fires back into their body. But we are talking hardcore runners doing monster hours of training. Then consider the majority of people who exercise are still fat anyway and it's hard to make a clear judgement call (unless you specifically look at the pros).

For me as a cyclist (i used to race track) my energy requirement has always been pretty low. I don't believe the calories burned number because there are soooo many fat cyclists out there doing huge hours but getting fatter! I have done 20hr weeks on the bike and still gained weight (fat) and that was at 8% BF eating 4,000cals/day. All the super fast, thin guys on bikes struggle with their weight. Basically it's an eating disorder to stay thin and fight the urge to eat.

I ride fasted. Energy only seriously becomes an issue for me after 2.5hrs (depending on how hard we are riding). I do 2hr hard rides fasted, no food during, no food after all the time. Going 3hrs-5hrs it's a food game and you need to eat each hour otherwise in hour 3 it's to late and you run out of carbs because the body can't process it quick enough (unless you are pounding gels or cans of coke constantly).

I am currently using no one/galeniko diet method as i need to drop weight to improve my watts/kg in order to climb quicker. I'm around 800-1000cals/day and 3 of those days consists of a 24hrs fast eating just dinner.

A 2.5hrs ride i did on the weekend was fairly hard including all out short hill sprints. I had my cheat meal last night (2,500cals) so i was fully carbed and during the ride I had 120 calories and felt perfectly fine at the end. I didn't eat until dinner 8hrs later which was 800cals. This morning i feel fine and will be on the bike doing an easy 40mins today.

I think people mistake nerve exhaustion for carb exhaustion. Bonking/hitting the wall is a lightswitch effect and your legs literally just stop. It's not a slow thing, it's not a nerve fatigue feeling, literally your legs seem to stop working out of the blue no matter what you do. If you are carbed that would be hours. A 20min HIT session is going to fatigue the nerves and cardio system. You feel exhausted but your muscles still function because they are carbed.

If i don't need food for a hard 2hr ride, i don't see how a 20min session requires food. What we see in the real world is people in gyms doing cardio, eating after, staying fat/getting fat vs hardcore cyclists/runners doing huge amounts of cardio eating like birds to balance performance/weight.

Hulkotron

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29892
  • Expunged
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #23 on: October 19, 2014, 04:02:41 PM »
Mayday you may want to consider making shorter posts.

Mayday

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2999
Re: thoughts on weight loss, optimal performance and striking a balance.
« Reply #24 on: October 19, 2014, 04:20:10 PM »
Mayday you may want to consider making shorter posts.

Yep, sorry for that.

*I have done 20hr weeks cycling and still gained weight (fat) at 8% BF eating 4,000cals/day.
*All fast, thin cyclists i know struggle with their weight. They eat like birds vs calorie expenditure.

*I ride fasted. I did a 2.5hr fairly hard ride on 120cals on the weekend. I ate 8hrs after.
*I am dieting eating around 800-1000cals/day and 3 of those days consists of a 24hrs fast eating just dinner.

*I think people mistake nerve exhaustion for carb exhaustion.
*Bonking/hitting the wall is a lightswitch effect and your legs literally just stop.
*Nerve/muscle/cardio exhaustion you just feel tired but can still function.

*What we see in the real world is people in gyms doing cardio, eating after, staying fat/getting fat vs hardcore cyclists/runners doing huge amounts of cardio eating like birds to balance performance/weight.