Crazy question for a Bodybuilding site....however, I will bite. I never did believe the landings, take offs and reconnect with the orbiting mother craft. All amateur Buck Rogers style. Man that was the 1970s. And it was all done from drawing board to completion in no time. If today our nation had to land a man on the moon to save earth, or we would all perish, it could not happen in two years time. We can't even afford the international space station. Or, shuttle replacement on a timely manner.
There were a lot of leaks out of Hollywood at the time that were quickly expunged from the the media. Giant sound stage...sworn secrecy...even OJ Simpson claimed he was one of the actors...then he was steely silent. Meanwhile China says they are going with astronauts to the moon. Good luck. Let me quickly check a fortune cookie. They better bring duct tape like Apollo 11. I have checked out the moon craft at Smithsonian and Clark AB museums. About the size of an SUV....ok. OK they could orbit earth and return. Slow mo land and take off on/from the moon?
Yet another foil hat moron, who has make an account here just for trolling with foil hat crap like this? Just for fun, please answer these few and simple questions:
1. How about the eyewitnesses? Apollo program employed thousands of engineers, hundred of thousands subcontractor, which were for example universities and such, so at the Apollo program were like a half a million workers, which know what, where and why they make parts etc. There is paperwork all of this, all the blueprints etc. and your argument is "it never happen"? Prove it? You can't.
2. How about the launches and all the eyewitnesses who saw them? Millions of people all over the world, and tens of thousands who saw it live at the launch site? They all are paid to lying, you just can't prove it? You childish imbeciles cannot even think any further, because it is 100% fact that they launch those rockets, but what next? You launch a rocket, 70 meters high to the space, and then what? If launch is a fact, they rise outside the atmosphere, and then what? They stay there jerking of 6 to 10 days, and then drop the capsule on the sea? Do you comprehend that at the sky, there is no where to hide, and there is hundred of thousands telescopes, radars etc. watching 24/7? Not only in the USA, but all over the world, so why doesn't anybody see how they were hovering there and jerking off? They would be perfectly visible even to the naked eye, so where did they hide? Behind the moon, which happens to be closest object there is?
3. How about all the film material and photos, which NASA have even in the internet, hundred of thousands photos and hours of film? Where you said that sound stage were, and how big it was? If you have a knowledge about the matter, please tell us where we can find a sound stage from the sixties, which have at least half a mile of free space with a self-supporting roof? Largest dome in this universe is 312m, build at 2014 at the New Singapore National Stadium. That is something like fifth of the mile, while photos and films prove that there was at least half a mile of space where drive the moon buggy and jumping around. Yes I know, you try to claim that there was a tiny little scale model of the moon, astronauts and the equipment, but that is ridiculously impossible with the props at that era. Watch the 2001: A Space Odyssey and you see that their props were silly at the best, and doesn't fool anybody. And if we assume there were dome big enough..
4. How about the lighting it? Inside the atmosphere, sun provides 130 watts of light per mē. To light that enormous dome as bright as those photos prove it was, you need something like 502000 watts inside the atmosphere, but they were outside, so are you able to understand what that means? So what they were using as a light source? What ever it was, it is something which human kind hasn't seen yet. All that light from one bulb? You have to think that again, because it is ridiculously impossible. Furthermore, did I mention the color temperature, which is quite different inside and outside the atmosphere? How do you fake it, if you haven't been in space, so that later years prove that you were 100% right? Never mind, this is too complicated already for you tiny little foil hat brains.
5. How about your phone, your handy or what ever you call your mobile phone? How do it works? Do it have GPS, and how that works? What it has to do with the Apollo program and NASA? Well, without the moon landings, you probably doesn't have that kind of phone, because GSM is child of the space program just like GPS is. You wouldn't have that computer either, in that form you have it now, because lot of that technique has been inspired from the space flights. NASA needs better computers, better memory components etc. and subcontractors did their best, and now you can benefit all that with your endless stupidity.
And what you do? You use your computer not for increasing your knowledge, but watching porn and digging every pile of foil hat crap you can find. Let me teach this one thing to you: BELIEVE ONLY WHAT HAS BEEN PROVED, REGARDLESS THE SOURCE. Why? Because foil hat morons hasn't been able to prove even one single thing from any of their theories, that's why. Take your pick, and I bet you can't present even a single evidence to confirm their claims. JFK murder? Zero evidence of the another shooter/shooters. 9/11? They hasn't been able to proof even that there was any explosions, not to mention that there were some kind of controlled demolition, so also there they have zero evidence. I could go on with these, but the point is that there isn't such conspiracy theory, which foil hats could prove to be a fact. Do you want to try? I dare you, show me 1 single and concrete evidence that Apollo program was hoax. Just one single evidence? With what you will fade all the evidence which proves that they were in the moon? How you make all the eyewitnesses and testimonies just disappear? I want to see that.
