Jurassic World teaser just released

[FermiDirac]

Makes me feel like a kid again. High expectations for this move.

[hench]

already getting slated for the cgi gate opening and obvious cgi trees.
Been looking forward to this, hope it delivers.

Makes me feel like a kid again. High expectations for this move.

[Dokey111]

How can it possibly impress 

[The_Punisher]

Makes me feel like a kid again. High expectations for this move.

after 21yrs since the original jurasic park (1993), CGI has gotten advanced and more complicated and we expect this movie to make history again, though, not many are convinced it will surpassed the original which is still hold the second record for most money made in movie history

[Hulkotron]

Jurassic Park has really stood the test of time as a technical achievement.  It's over 20 years old I think (can't remember when it came out for sure) and the dinosaurs still look good.

[Parker]

How can it possibly impress 

With new info on the dinosaurs, the dinosaurs may change. You know, unlike back in the original, the theory that the T-Rex only responded to movement. Now there is info that the T-Rex chicks may have had feathers. And the "raptors" as well.

[thebrink]

How can it possibly impress 

exactly. all CGI

[240 is Back]

they should really apply CGI to porn.  Imagine a nice stack of some 4-tittied girls getting creative.

[Megalodon]

after 21yrs since the original jurasic park (1993), CGI has gotten advanced and more complicated and we expect this movie to make history again, though, not many are convinced it will surpassed the original which is still hold the second record for most money made in movie history

CGI has "gotten more advanced" but a lot of what helped greatly in the 1st three movies was practical NON-cgi effects seamlessly mixed in with cgi.

The technology is there to create better cgi than ever before but the render time per frame would amount to 30 years torender a cg laden movie. Some of the fantastic cg still architectural or human still shots take over 1 day to render, some a week. 1 day times 24 fps equals almost a month for 1 second of  THE BEST cgi.

They'll get there but cgi still has a long way to go.

#zbrushMaya3dsmaxBlenderCinema4dLightwaveSoftimageRaydreamstudioCaligariTruespaceGlobalilluminatedNormalmap

[The_Punisher]

CGI has "gotten more advanced" but a lot of what helped greatly in the 1st three movies was practical NON-cgi effects seamlessly mixed in with cgi.

The technology is there to create better cgi than ever before but the render time per frame would amount to 30 years torender a cg laden movie. Some of the fantastic cg still architectural or human still shots take over 1 day to render, some a week. 1 day times 24 fps equals almost a month for 1 second of  THE BEST cgi.

They'll get there but cgi still has a long way to go.

#zbrushMaya3dsmaxBlenderCinema4dLightwaveSoftimageRaydreamstudioCaligariTruespaceGlobalilluminatedNormalmap

too much CGI is ruining movies these day and age, but after "Avatar", everyone is trying to copy the james Cameroon way

[thebrink]

too much CGI is ruining movies these day and age, but after "Avatar", everyone is trying to copy the james Cameroon way

Exactly. Doesn't matter how good the CGI is , if you know its fake then the alot of the thrill and believability is gone.

[Alucard]

CGI still looks extremely fake, at least for me, if overused can completely ruin everything... It must be used with moderation, even today... Everytime i look at these CGI crapfest my mind goes to The Terminator or Predator (just two examples), with a real T-800 and with the alien played by a real person with a real suit... Plus Alien or Aliens, everything looked real, it was awesome... It was probably more expensive, needed more talent and craftmanship, but it looked hell of a lot better...

[Mr Anabolic]

Same shit over and over again.

Silly.

[SuperTed]

CGI still looks extremely fake, at least for me, if overused can completely ruin everything... It must be used with moderation, even today... Everytime i look at these CGI crapfest my mind goes to The Terminator or Predator (just two examples), with a real T-800 and with the alien played by a real person with a real suit... Plus Alien or Aliens, everything looked real, it was awesome... It was probably more expensive, needed more talent and craftmanship, but it looked hell of a lot better...

X2.

CGI is absolute crap 9 times out of 10.

[Hulkotron]

X2.

CGI is absolute crap 9 times out of 10.

The worst was in The Matrix sequel where they hyped the CGI as being revolutionary and it ended up looking like a cutscene from a PlayStation game.

[Alucard]

The worst was in The Matrix sequel where they hyped the CGI as being revolutionary and it ended up looking like a cutscene from a PlayStation game.

That's what CGI really look in a movie even today, cutscenes from late 90s/early 00s videogames... Difference is, you played those games, and at that time they were amazing and unsurpassed, cutscenes were useful to tell a part of the story, nothing else...

[ritch]

never even watched the others, that shit is for kids, looks super fake anyways, CGI or the other way.

[Papper]

Jurassic Park was a prime example of good cgi. Not overused and extremely polished and calculated.

But more to the point, it was ground breaking at the time. Ordinary cgi can't impress like that anymore.avatar was good 3d but no Jurassic Park...

I think Virtual Reality or something else is the next step

[Nails]

[FermiDirac]

The fly?

[G_Thang]

CGI > Chris Pratt

[Alucard]

Jurassic Park was a prime example of good cgi. Not overused and extremely polished and calculated.

But more to the point, it was ground breaking at the time. Ordinary cgi can't impress like that anymore.avatar was good 3d but no Jurassic Park...

I think Virtual Reality or something else is the next step

They maybe don't impress anymore but the dinosaurs and background looked believable, and how they should be made still today, imo... Take Jaws for example, that man-made shark is still today the most real... The only other well made shark movie was Deep Blue Sea, imo... After years and years no one was able to do a good shark movie without using crappy CGI or images from documentaries, and Jaws is from 1975...

[njflex]

THATS NOT MICHAEL JACKSON AFTER 'PEPSI'SHOOT,,

[hench]

Yep nothing beats practical effects. Look at Indiana Jones, great sets and real action then they went against the grain with the Crystal skull and it was shit.
I don't know why they don't use more miniatures or models and enlarge or insert them with graphics programs. Like with hulk, rather than cgi him, why not get a bodybuilder like Lee priest who has the short proportions and enlarge him to 15ft high.
Any stuff that's actually there looks better than any cgi, spot on with jaws.

They maybe don't impress anymore but the dinosaurs and background looked believable, and how they should be made still today, imo... Take Jaws for example, that man-made shark is still today the most real... The only other well made shark movie was Deep Blue Sea, imo... After years and years no one was able to do a good shark movie without using crappy CGI or images from documentaries, and Jaws is from 1975...

[MikMaq]

They maybe don't impress anymore but the dinosaurs and background looked believable, and how they should be made still today, imo... Take Jaws for example, that man-made shark is still today the most real... The only other well made shark movie was Deep Blue Sea, imo... After years and years no one was able to do a good shark movie without using crappy CGI or images from documentaries, and Jaws is from 1975...

x2

Alien-Aliens, T1 T2, 2001, blade runner, etc looks far better than anything made since.

It's pretty wild how good things back then could look.