See, I'm all for the cop Wilson wasting mike brown at his car, and I think the shoot at 20 feet away (150 feet from the car) was probably justified too.
BUT
The cop did tell us it was 10 to 20 feet, and it was actually 150 feet. That's a big deal. It becomes two incidents. It becomes an attack at the car - what is essentially a foot chase - and THEN a 2nd attack, where the unarmed wounded Brown was charging the cop. Now, if you want to say the shoot at that spot was justified, I won't argue it. The cop could have used non-deadly options, given the distance, but he didn't, and I've said from minute #1, this was probably a legal shoot.
BUT the shit that everyone is doing - trying to say they were one incident, that it was a justified shoot because Brown was reaching in window, etc. THAT IS BULLSHIT. It was 2 seperate shoots. And unless you're cool with police "merging" events on YOUR ass lol, then you should agree it's bullshit too.