Author Topic: So apparently World population may start shrinking far sooner than expected.  (Read 7124 times)

MikMaq

  • Guest

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
you mean the white population, then yes. We're toast!
?

MikMaq

  • Guest
you mean the white population, then yes. We're toast!
Nah even the indians and muslim have will start to have shrinking populations very soon.


It makes you wonder if this is the cause of the assumed global deflation.

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Nah even the indians and muslim have will start to have shrinking populations very soon.


It makes you wonder if this is the cause of the assumed global deflation.

why do we need to keep increasing our numbers though? Just strains our resources it seems.
?

Dave D

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17058
For a minute I believed this post was you making amends because you were dying.......

MikMaq

  • Guest
why do we need to keep increasing our numbers though? Just strains our resources it seems.
Something about economic grow.

With slumping population growth, real estate, oil, food, etc are all gonna increase at a far slower rate in value than expected. Places like china are already peaking in growth because of there soon to be falling population, even india brazil will soon have falling populations.

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Something about economic grow.

With slumping population growth, real estate, oil, food, etc are all gonna increase at a far slower rate in value than expected. Places like china are already peaking in growth because of there soon to be falling population, even india brazil will soon have falling populations.

Even if India slows down, they have us outnumbered by so much, lol.. Plus we're not making kids, so they still win...
?

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Something about economic grow.

With slumping population growth, real estate, oil, food, etc are all gonna increase at a far slower rate in value than expected. Places like china are already peaking in growth because of there soon to be falling population, even india brazil will soon have falling populations.

That's a vast over simplification.  Population density does not automatically equate to economic growth.  One could use many countries as example, but the U.S exemplifies this.  Over 47 million on food stamps, 50% of the population on some form of social assistance and a job participation rate at its lowest since 1978.  Will adding more population lead to growth?  Not likely.  It will strain the economy further in an ever growing welfare state.  Demand for certain resources and consumer goods tend to fall off when people don't have jobs and have less disposable income.  Nothing to do with population.  

MikMaq

  • Guest
That's a vast over simplification.  Population density does not automatically equate to economic growth.  One could use many countries as example, but the U.S exemplifies this.  Over 47 million on food stamps, 50% of the population on some form of social assistance and a job participation rate at its lowest since 1978.  Will adding more population lead to growth?  Not likely.  It will strain the economy further in an ever growing welfare state.  Demand for certain resources and consumer goods tend to fall off when people don't have jobs and have less disposable income.  Nothing to do with population.  
So to correct my obvious generalization, you frame a response to a country that falls completely outside of relevance of what is being talked about.

It's absurd how any global event american's will twist to revolve around their domestic politics.

Of course it's not automatic growth, however it was used as justification for raising commodities through the roof.

Anyway america still is just as concerned about the global market, immigration is crucial part of industrialized economies as long as we want to have some form of retirement.




Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
So to correct my obvious generalization, you frame a response to a country that falls completely outside of relevance of what is being talked about.

It's absurd how any global event american's will twist to revolve around their domestic politics.

Of course it's not automatic growth, however it was used as justification for raising commodities through the roof.

Anyway america still is just as concerned about the global market, immigration is crucial part of industrialized economies as long as we want to have some form of retirement.



It makes you wonder if this is the cause of the assumed global deflation.

An obvious and incorrect generalization on your part.  I used the U.S as but one of many examples that could be used.  Regardless, are you really suggesting that the U.S is not relevant to the World economy as the now 2nd largest nation in terms of GDP and holder of the World reserve currency?  If you've not noticed, all major economies are intertwined unlike any other time in history.  Population, or lack there of, has nothing to do with perceived deflation or the ills of the world economy at the moment.  Declining population is not impacting the cost of commodities either. Around the World mountains of cheap stimulus and suppressed interest rates have caused inflated asset and commodity prices, which cannot be maintained as the punch bowl gets taken away. Over time, the monetary heroin has less and less of an effect as well, requiring greater and greater levels of stimulus.  Just look at Japan.  Additionally, high levels of unemployment impact consumer demand, unrelated to population. You're out of your wheelhouse.


MikMaq

  • Guest
An obvious and incorrect generalization on your part.  I used the U.S as but one of many examples that could be used.  Regardless, are you really suggesting that the U.S is not relevant to the World economy as the now 2nd largest nation in terms of GDP and holder of the World reserve currency?

Are you fucking stupid of course the US matters, it's part of the team, what it doesn't play is the roal of defense, midfield, and forward all at once.  America is an outlier on the population shit story, because it can attract large numbers of immigrants, and right now has a relatively stable birth rate for a first world country, no other country fits into that scenario like that.




  If you've not noticed, all major economies are intertwined unlike any other time in history.  Population, or lack there of, has nothing to do with perceived deflation or the ills of the world economy at the moment.  Declining population is not impacting the cost of commodities either. Around the World mountains of cheap stimulus and suppressed interest rates have caused inflated asset and commodity prices, which cannot be maintained as the punch bowl gets taken away. Over time, the monetary heroin has less and less of an effect as well, requiring greater and greater levels of stimulus.  Just look at Japan.  Additionally, high levels of unemployment impact consumer demand, unrelated to population. You're out of your wheelhouse.


So  you think there is no connection to commodities there  valuations and there populations.

You've spent far too much time with imaginary number here.

Bear232

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 252
85% of the Chinese population still lives in mid 19th century technology.  So population is not directly correlated to economic growth.  It comes down to available resources, food, energy, etc.

Mr Anabolic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10647
  • Better to die on your feet than on your knees.
85% of the Chinese population still lives in mid 19th century technology.  So population is not directly correlated to economic growth.  It comes down to available resources, food, energy, etc.


Also time and land mass.

Tapeworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 29349
  • Hold Fast
Sperg epidemic.

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
Also time and land mass.

Geography helps as well..the U.S is blessed that we have no real enemies in our hemisphere......we can't be invaded........and we have never had a war with a foriegn power on our territory, (unless you want to count the 9/11 attack) so we never had to a shattered infrastructure that had to be rebuilt.....

Natural Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11164
the problem is that wasps are getting replaced by latinos as they dont reproduce much these days...

MikMaq

  • Guest
the problem is that wasps are getting replaced by latinos as they dont reproduce much these days...
Latino's are actually have one of the faster falling birth rates. Pretty soon most of latin america will start to shrink.

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11063
Latino's are actually have one of the faster falling birth rates. Pretty soon most of latin america will start to shrink.

The affluent and educated are having less kids. Compare to the blacks and uneducated who are having more kids.

andreisdaman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16720
The affluent and educated are having less kids. Compare to the blacks and uneducated who are having more kids.


sigh...WRONG.....black population rate in the U.S. has remained at a steady 12-13% for decades.......Hispanic population rate has surged whereby Hispanics are now about 15% of pop

youandme

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11063

sigh...WRONG.....black population rate in the U.S. has remained at a steady 12-13% for decades.......Hispanic population rate has surged whereby Hispanics are now about 15% of pop
link to that statistic? Perhaps in the US that may be true, but the article even stated that in the countryNiger the average child is 7 per woman.


The Abdominal Snoman

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • DON'T BE A TRAITOR TO YOUR TRIBE
why do we need to keep increasing our numbers though? Just strains our resources it seems.

If you live in America and have flown over the so called "fly over States", it's easy to see how much land that's not being used...I venture to guess that America itself could support 25 billion people without it being over crowded if it needed to...Certainly not with the economic system we have now or the way we abuse our resources...

Howard

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15401
That's a vast over simplification.  Population density does not automatically equate to economic growth.  One could use many countries as example, but the U.S exemplifies this.  Over 47 million on food stamps, 50% of the population on some form of social assistance and a job participation rate at its lowest since 1978.  Will adding more population lead to growth?  Not likely.  It will strain the economy further in an ever growing welfare state.  Demand for certain resources and consumer goods tend to fall off when people don't have jobs and have less disposable income.  Nothing to do with population.  

All I know is that we have more gyms /health clubs along with an increase in NPC memberships now.
Nothing else matters when it comes to population growth on earth.

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941

Are you fucking stupid of course the US matters, it's part of the team, what it doesn't play is the roal of defense, midfield, and forward all at once.  America is an outlier on the population shit story, because it can attract large numbers of immigrants, and right now has a relatively stable birth rate for a first world country, no other country fits into that scenario like that.

 So  you think there is no connection to commodities there  valuations and there populations.

You've spent far too much time with imaginary number here.
More garbled gibberish. Immigration and stable birth rates mean little when you've been de-industrialized.  Unless you're counting service sector jobs flipping burgers.  How else do you explain a labor participation rate at its lowest since 1978?  By the way, figure out what the "R" in BRICS stands for yet?

Lustral

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5164
  • FREE NOODLES
That's a vast over simplification.  Population density does not automatically equate to economic growth.  One could use many countries as example, but the U.S exemplifies this.  Over 47 million on food stamps, 50% of the population on some form of social assistance and a job participation rate at its lowest since 1978.  Will adding more population lead to growth?  Not likely.  It will strain the economy further in an ever growing welfare state.  Demand for certain resources and consumer goods tend to fall off when people don't have jobs and have less disposable income.  Nothing to do with population.  

Texas has a bigger economy than russia you putin loving fag. Africa is main problem for population growth as there is no sustainable economic model in many places just charity.

Mr.1derful

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4941
Texas has a bigger economy than russia you putin loving fag. Africa is main problem for population growth as there is no sustainable economic model in many places just charity.

The only fag is the guy in the White House and those who voted for him.  The U.S economy is still in the midst of a phony recovery.  Why else is the FED too chicken shit to raise interest rates?  Or had you not noticed they haven't raised rates in around 6 years?  You're probably too busy shopping at Walmart and fixing up the double wide to care. QE4 is just around the corner.  Enjoy your Obama Care.