Black Brunch....hahhah have you guys heard about these retards yet?

[Archer77]

My argument has stayed the same. You're the one who seems to come up with a new argument in every post. You claim that you corrected yourself in the last thread, but you repeated the same incorrect argument in this thread.

You admit deleting your posts, pizza face?   My last argument after reviewing the data is the same.  It was my original argument.  Upon actually rereading the data and methodology-which you didn't-I realized I was right. It's not a sample size of only ten like you claim.  Reread your own thread for the details.

[Al Doggity]

Again, you didn't read your own thread.  I posted information specifically about sexual assault and limiting the number of incidents to ten to prevent skewing the data.  Read your own damn thread.

Which has nothing to do with sample size.

[Archer77]

Which has nothing to do with sample size.

reread your thread pizza face. You have no idea what your arguing.  You're going back and forth.   

[Al Doggity]

You admit deleting your posts, pizza face?   My last argument after reviewing the data is the same.  It was my original argument.  Upon actually rereading the data and methodology-which you didn't-I realized I was right.

so, then  do you agree or disagree with this statement:

150,000 people were interviewed for dozens of categories. Some categories have less than 10 respondents. The study warns that those categories are unreliable.

[Archer77]

so, then  do you agree or disagree with this statement:

150,000 people were interviewed for dozens of categories. Some categories have less than 10 respondents. The study warns that those categories are unreliable.

All the information is in the other thread.  Why are you deleting your posts, pizza face?

[Al Doggity]

All the information is in the other thread.  Why are you deleting your posts, pizza face?

I haven't deleted anything.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

150,000 people were interviewed for dozens of categories. Some categories have less than 10 respondents. The study warns that those categories are unreliable.

[Archer77]

I haven't deleted anything.

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement:

150,000 people were interviewed for dozens of categories. Some categories have less than 10 respondents. The study warns that those categories are unreliable.

What what were those categories?   And you're lying about deleting your posts.

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cv13.pdf

[tonymctones]

I never said I posted pics.

why not? this is a bodybuilding forum by the way

[Al Doggity]

What what were those categories?   And you're lying about deleting your posts.

I haven't deleted anything. You quote me in almost all of your posts, so even if I was deleting stuff , I can't delete it out of your posts.

Do you agree with the statement or do you feel it is not factual? If it is not factual, why is it wrong?

150,000 people were interviewed for dozens of categories. Some categories have less than 10 respondents. The study warns that those categories are unreliable.

[Al Doggity]

why not? this is a bodybuilding forum by the way

And? 

[Archer77]

I haven't deleted anything. You quote me in almost all of your posts, so even if I was deleting stuff , I can't delete it out of your posts.

Do you agree with the statement or do you feel it is not factual? If it is not factual, why is it wrong?

150,000 people were interviewed for dozens of categories. Some categories have less than 10 respondents. The study warns that those categories are unreliable.

And what are those categories?

[Archer77]

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=561440.75#lastPost


All the information is here. Read it before Al deletes it.

[Al Doggity]

And what are those categories?

The categories in the study right here:

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf

[Al Doggity]

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=561440.75#lastPost


All the information is here. Read it before Al deletes it.

What have I allegedly deleted? You quote almost all of my posts and they are identical.

[Archer77]

The categories in the study right here:

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf

 

List them please. Where do they use 10 respondents?

[Al Doggity]

 

List them please.

They're right there.

Why would you me listing them change whether or not this statement is true?

150,000 people were interviewed for dozens of categories. Some categories have less than 10 respondents. The study warns that those categories are unreliable.

[Archer77]

They're right there.

Why would you me listing them change whether or not this statement is true?

150,000 people were interviewed for dozens of categories. Some categories have less than 10 respondents. The study warns that those categories are unreliable.

Where do they say 10 respondents?

[Archer77]

The numbers in these tables are estimates derived from a complex sample survey.  Because the numbers were not derived from a complete census, each one has a sampling error associated with it.   Information on the use of these numbers and their reliability is contained in the third appendix.  In general, all levels based on about 10 or fewer cases were not analyzed in this report.  Ten sample cases represent weighted estimates of approximately 40,000 cases.  The levels, rates, and percentages based on these small numbers are accurate, but the standard error estimates for them are not reliable.  Therefore caution should be used when comparing these small estimates.

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/ascii/CVUS92.TXT


You haven't read shit, pizza face.

[tonymctones]

And?  

in bodybuilding people get in shape to show off, im guessing archer is right and youre a fat ass who doesnt even lift....

[Al Doggity]

The numbers in these tables are estimates derived from a complex sample survey.  Because the numbers were not derived from a complete census, each one has a sampling error associated with it.   Information on the use of these numbers and their reliability is contained in the third appendix.  In general, all levels based on about 10 or fewer cases were not analyzed in this report.  Ten sample cases represent weighted estimates of approximately 40,000 cases.  The levels, rates, and percentages based on these small numbers are accurate, but the standard error estimates for them are not reliable.  Therefore caution should be used when comparing these small estimates.

http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/ascii/CVUS92.TXT


You haven't read shit, pizza face.

This is from 1992 and they exclude any categories with less than 10.
In general, all levels based on about 10 or fewer cases were not analyzed in this report.

The reports we were discussing were from 2011 and 2013 and they did include categories with less than 10 respondents. Different study, different methodology
 

[Al Doggity]

in bodybuilding people get in shape to show off, im guessing archer is right and youre a fat ass who doesnt even lift....

Archer  says he's a better bodybuilder than whoever he thinks I am. You don 't want to see his pics? 
I didn't even say anything about pics or being better than anyone.

[tonymctones]

Archer  says he's a better bodybuilder than whoever he thinks I am. You don 't want to see his pics? 
I didn't even say anything about pics or being better than anyone.

sure why dont you and archer post pics then?

[Al Doggity]

sure why dont you and archer post pics then?

Yeah, we'll both get right on this.

[tonymctones]

Yeah, we'll both get right on this.

hahah what a puss you are, like I said I bet archer is right and your a fat ass who doesnt even lift.

[Al Doggity]

hahah what a puss you are, like I said I bet archer is right and your a fat ass who doesnt even lift.

Alright. Post face and body pic and I'll do the same.