lats should be alot thicker on that amount of gear, thighs looks good.
I never understood this concept. That one SHOULD be at a certain level of development given a certain amount of gear. Of course, the feeling here is that universally no one is at the proper level given the amount of gear they are on. Always below.
How developed should Gary Strydom's back be "given the amount of gear" he is on? Dan Hill, who gets reamed here, has to at least have above average genetics compared to most on this board, and the general population, given that he at least got a pro card and won some shows. Yet he is universally bashed as someone who isn't at the level he should be "given the amount of gear" he's on (was on).
When someone is criticized as having a below average response to AAS, which seems to be pretty much everybody according to this board, is the implication that they should give up or that they should increase the dose?
Because Bostin's lats are not what they should be given the amount of gear he is on, and he is one who is willing to do whatever it takes to win, should he then increase his dose? Do you think that maybe he just doesn't know how to train his back? Obvious he knows how to train his quads? Is he not applying the same principles to his back as he is to his quads.
What do you think he should do, given that quitting is not an option at this time, to win?