I'm a birther. I was maybe the 2nd or 3rd getbigger to say "Wait, something ain't right there...."
When MSNBC *aggressively* attacked the idea, I instantly KNEW they wanted to pre-empt what are some legit Qs. When they started instantly comparing birthers to 911 and holocaust deniers and other insane things, I was 100% convinced they were scared shitless of the story.
THe man wants to be president - having his fcking papers in order should be a minimal requirement, without a doubt. I can't buy a bottle of merlot without a VALID piece of ID... and if there's one Q about his birth cert, then YES, it should be explored in a major way. That's why I want an investigation into it... nothing to hide, fine, show us something more than a magic piece of paper that didn't fade in 50 fcking years, and tell me why every other piece of paper from that era has aged lol.
FOR ME, once I believed obama was a foreign-born person, there was NO OTHER OPTION than to impeach. Art 2:
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President;
So for me, that was the breaking point on impeachment. I wasn't happy with F&F, or benghazi, but this was just too much - this was a direct violation of the Constitution IMHO... and if that's the case, then I would be anti-Constitition if I was anti-impeachment.
Coach, I'll quit ragging on you. I was hoping you'd see this point, and change positions on amnesty. *IF* Obama really wasn't born here, then anyone that respects the constituion HAS to support impeachment, that's my take on it. You're welcome to disagree. I came at 333386 pretty hard, and through debate and discussion he said "ya know what, screw what Rush says... impeachment is the right play for obama". I was hoping you'd do the same.
