I have seen them both in person disagree.
I'd rather look like that than how he looks today.
Ronnie Coleman had far better genetics. And Ronnie had much lower body fat too.
Actually, I'd go with Paul Dillet. Better lines than Ronnie but just didn't have the insane work ethic.
I hear that all the time. Kai transformed his body not so that he can be attractive to the average man or woman but so he could win shows. If he stayed like that he'd be just another poor nig from a broken family selling drugs and his ass to make ends meet.For a guy who has never had to punch a time clock in his life, he's done extremely well.
Paul Dillett getting absolutely destroyed
For all the reasons discussed a million times. Dillett could not properly train/show/pose from the back.
Ronnie’s Arms dwarfed Dillett’s arms. Quads too. Once Ronnie took the same dosages as Dillett, Ronnie took over.. and Dillett quietly retired
Ruhl has better legs that Dillett... so how could Dillett possibly stand up to Coleman?
Paul's legs were much better than Ronnies. Paul's legs were all-time top 10 stuff.
1993 NPC Nationals - Heavyweights & Flex Wheeler Interview
Arms, too. His triceps are up there with the best ever, and his biceps bellies were insanely long. When he flexed, you couldn't fit a mouse fart between his biceps and forearms.
Ronnie’s Triceps were quite clearly bigger and thicker than Paul’s. Paul could not hang with a Ronnie when Ronnie stepped up to Dillett’s drug dosages.Ronnie’s arm probably measures at least an inch larger than Paul here. Tricep size is not even close.
In that particular pic from that angle maybe , but Paul's triceps are EONS better than Ronnies
Amateur vs Pro