Author Topic: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?  (Read 16631 times)

Big Chiro Flex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10413
  • FREE FOOZLE
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #100 on: March 05, 2015, 11:17:16 AM »
Would love to hold you back  :P

Would be an honor to have you in my corner, chief.

El Diablo Blanco

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31841
  • Nom Nom Nom Nom
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #101 on: March 05, 2015, 12:02:52 PM »
Found a pic, thanks to funk51:

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=466913.0;attach=595236;image

It's the bench in the middle of the pic.

Straight up awesome gym.  Probably smells like rich mahoghany.

Erik C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #102 on: March 05, 2015, 05:04:36 PM »
Straight up awesome gym.  Probably smells like rich mahoghany.

Gym wise, Vince Gironda certainly knew what he was doing.

Never1AShow

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
  • World Record Holder in French Toast Diving
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #103 on: March 05, 2015, 05:59:31 PM »
Found a pic, thanks to funk51:

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=466913.0;attach=595236;image

It's the bench in the middle of the pic.

Is that a ghost in the mirror?

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12989
  • What you!
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #104 on: March 05, 2015, 06:29:03 PM »
I don't have a link to a picture. Here's a description of the good preacher bench that Larry Scott used at Vince's Gym, quoting Larry Scott again. "The correct design of the bench is that it has to have a face that is convex rather than flat. In other words, the face should bulge out in the middle. Most preacher benches are flat because they are easier to manufacture that way. But the bench has to have a convex face. And the area at the top where you place your armpits has to be rounded and well padded, because you're going to be bearing down real hard on that bench when you're doing the curls. Most benches have a sharp ridge on top. and it hurts your arm pits."

Larry Scott never explained why the preacher bench needs to be convex with a bulge in the middle. Does it just 'feel' better or is there another reason? I think I know.

Larry avoided putting much pressure on the elbows joints because of the curved surface of the Preacher Bench.

The elbow joint has a delicate sheath going over it that connects forearm muscles to the upper arms. When pressure is put directly on the elbows either doing

curls or triceps extensions over a bench then the sheath can be damaged and might not heal if sufficient damage is done. You can see that most manufacturers

of gym equipment have no clue about this and continue to build curl machines where the elbows contact the pads. These can be dangerous. The pads should

be shortened to a couple of inches above the elbows. I have had to modify some Nautilus machines to make them safer. We also now do our lying triceps

extensions with the elbow joints a couple of inches past the ends of the benches. You won't notice much if using light weights but when you get stronger the

force causes rubbing on the joints and this is when the damage occurs.

Erik C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #105 on: March 05, 2015, 06:45:12 PM »
Larry Scott never explained why the preacher bench needs to be convex with a bulge in the middle. Does it just 'feel' better or is there another reason? I think I know.


He didn't say, except that it was way better than the flat surface preacher bench, in terms of results obtained. And he was living proof of those results.

My take on it, is that the convex surface allows for the natural hyper extension of the elbow joint, that allows for greater muscle use in the curl movement, including the negative. Would work that way too, for the "burns" he did, that were great for brachialis growth.

Grape Ape

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 24763
  • SC è un asino
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #106 on: March 05, 2015, 06:49:41 PM »
Larry Scott probably could have done straight curls only and would have looked the same.   It's mostly genetics.
Y

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33779
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #107 on: March 05, 2015, 06:50:23 PM »
Found a pic, thanks to funk51:

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=466913.0;attach=595236;image

It's the bench in the middle of the pic.

It looks no different than the one in my gym.

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33779
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #108 on: March 05, 2015, 06:52:24 PM »
Larry Scott probably could have done straight curls only and would have looked the same.   It's mostly genetics.

My thoughts exactly.

mr.turbo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4617
  • Team Freedom
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #109 on: March 05, 2015, 06:57:04 PM »
seems like the curve would allow the torso to come forward a little into a more natural posture.
"

Erik C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #110 on: March 05, 2015, 06:59:32 PM »
Larry Scott probably could have done straight curls only and would have looked the same.   It's mostly genetics.

The genetics excuse again, for your lack of gains.

Vince B

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12989
  • What you!
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #111 on: March 05, 2015, 06:59:53 PM »
My thoughts exactly.

Not so fast. Let us not have Bro science popping up in the middle of a Bro science thread.

Larry did some exercises expressly to make his biceps larger nearer the elbows. I respect Larry as an authority on exercise performance and execution.

He would turn his hands inwards to try to build that part of the biceps/brachialis.



Never1AShow

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8452
  • World Record Holder in French Toast Diving
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #112 on: March 05, 2015, 07:00:31 PM »
Crossfit CROSS-SHIT is really the winner here.  It is the ultimate Broscience.  

Erik C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #113 on: March 05, 2015, 07:01:52 PM »
seems like the curve would allow the torso to come forward a little into a more natural posture.

How? The convex curve is under the arms, not the torso.

Big Chiro Flex

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10413
  • FREE FOOZLE
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #114 on: March 05, 2015, 07:02:12 PM »
The genetics excuse again, for your lack of gains.

Erik C I like you as a poster but must insist you lower your tone when addressing Grape Ape, he is a large man and a close friend.

Erik C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #115 on: March 05, 2015, 07:07:52 PM »
Erik C I like you as a poster but must insist you lower your tone when addressing Grape Ape, he is a large man and a close friend.

Then why cop the genetics plea?

_aj_

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17641
  • The Return of the OG
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #116 on: March 05, 2015, 07:09:28 PM »
Then why cop the genetics plea?

Are you seriously saying that genetics has nothing to do with the shape, size, bellies and insertions of Scott's biceps?

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33779
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #117 on: March 05, 2015, 07:11:12 PM »
Not so fast. Let us not have Bro science popping up in the middle of a Bro science thread.

Larry did some exercises expressly to make his biceps larger nearer the elbows. I respect Larry as an authority on exercise performance and execution.

He would turn his hands inwards to try to build that part of the biceps/brachialis.




I am not convinced you can build one area of a muscle up with specific exercises.  A muscle contracts as whole or not at all.  Any twists or supination or what not exercises would work the biceps evenly through out.  


Erik C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #118 on: March 05, 2015, 07:18:58 PM »
Are you seriously saying that genetics has nothing to do with the shape, size, bellies and insertions of Scott's biceps?

No. I'm saying that the work he did got him the shape and size that he ended up with. If he hadn't have worked those muscles, then they wouldn't have grown at all. There's this stupid notion out there that, some people will get big no matter what they do, and that isn't true at all. Before he hit that special preacher bench at Vince's gym, and started using Rheo Blair's protein powder, he didn't have big guns, and he wouldn't have had them without doing what he did, and that was before he used roids.

mr.turbo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4617
  • Team Freedom
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #119 on: March 05, 2015, 07:20:03 PM »
How? The convex curve is under the arms, not the torso.

the curve bulges out to accommodate the torso and the arms will come back a little

"

Erik C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #120 on: March 05, 2015, 07:22:06 PM »
the curve bulges out to accommodate the torso and the arms will come back a little



The curve is on the front of the bench under the arms. The torso is at the back of the bench when you are curling.

Erik C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #121 on: March 05, 2015, 07:23:26 PM »
I am not convinced you can build one area of a muscle up with specific exercises.  A muscle contracts as whole or not at all.  Any twists or supination or what not exercises would work the biceps evenly through out.  

Wow. Totally wrong.

Erik C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #122 on: March 05, 2015, 07:30:57 PM »
Not so fast. Let us not have Bro science popping up in the middle of a Bro science thread.

Larry did some exercises expressly to make his biceps larger nearer the elbows. I respect Larry as an authority on exercise performance and execution.

He would turn his hands inwards to try to build that part of the biceps/brachialis.


Well yes, but in those pictures, Larry is posing for pictures. That's not the way he used a preacher bench. His arms are way too high up, as the bench should be under his armpits, elbows further down, and that looks like a flat surface preacher bench, that he said doesn't work.

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #123 on: March 05, 2015, 07:40:34 PM »
"carbs make you fat"
?

Erik C

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2516
Re: What is the stupidest "Bro Science" thing you've heard?
« Reply #124 on: March 05, 2015, 07:42:45 PM »
"carbs make you fat"

Absolute Fact!