Author Topic: Senator Who Organized Letter To Iran Has Said He Wants To Sabotage Negotiations  (Read 589 times)

blacken700

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11873
  • Getbig!
 He says the U.S. should, instead, engage in a policy of "regime change,"        don't these fuckers learn

Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), the organizer of a controversial letter warning Iran that the U.S. government will not necessarily abide by any agreement Iran strikes with the Obama administration, previously told a conservative audience that the goal of congressional action should be to scuttle talks with Iran. The U.S. should, instead, engage in a policy of "regime change," he argued.

Iran hawks in the House and Senate have long said that their aim is to help the White House strike a tougher deal with Iran. The administration and others, meanwhile, have charged that the hawks' true motivation is to undermine the talks entirely. Cotton, for his part, has made no secret that he wants the talks to fail.

"The end of these negotiations isn't an unintended consequence of congressional action. It is very much an intended consequence. A feature, not a bug, so speak," Cotton said in January, speaking at a conservative conference hosted by the advocacy group Heritage Action for America.

Cotton's bald admission would be less interesting had he not been the one to spearhead a Senate effort revealed Monday by Bloomberg View -- an open letter to Iran's leaders signed by 47 Republican senators. The letter explains the workings of the American government to the Iranian regime.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/09/tom-cotton-iran_n_6831328.html

The Enigma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1486
  • Porsche 911 Turbo Carerra. My reality, your dream.
He says the U.S. should, instead, engage in a policy of "regime change,"        don't these fuckers learn

Source: Huffington Post

WASHINGTON -- Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), the organizer of a controversial letter warning Iran that the U.S. government will not necessarily abide by any agreement Iran strikes with the Obama administration, previously told a conservative audience that the goal of congressional action should be to scuttle talks with Iran. The U.S. should, instead, engage in a policy of "regime change," he argued.

Iran hawks in the House and Senate have long said that their aim is to help the White House strike a tougher deal with Iran. The administration and others, meanwhile, have charged that the hawks' true motivation is to undermine the talks entirely. Cotton, for his part, has made no secret that he wants the talks to fail.

"The end of these negotiations isn't an unintended consequence of congressional action. It is very much an intended consequence. A feature, not a bug, so speak," Cotton said in January, speaking at a conservative conference hosted by the advocacy group Heritage Action for America.

Cotton's bald admission would be less interesting had he not been the one to spearhead a Senate effort revealed Monday by Bloomberg View -- an open letter to Iran's leaders signed by 47 Republican senators. The letter explains the workings of the American government to the Iranian regime.

Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/03/09/tom-cotton-iran_n_6831328.html

Who needs congress when King Monkey can make all decisions via executive order.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Yeah a nuclear arms race is better right?
L

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31069
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Yeah a nuclear arms race is better right?

Iran reaching a nuclear state is inevitable. 


headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Because nothing is being done to stop by by the current admin...barry don't care.  He's rather golf and wave a piece of paper saying that he made some bullshit treaty that won't be followed by Iran or ratified by Congress.
L

Soul Crusher

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 39441
  • Doesnt lie about lifting.
The issue is that a deal of this size should require a Treaty - not a backroom deal where no one knows wtf we are giving away for fake empty promises by Iran

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
He says the U.S. should, instead, engage in a policy of "regime change,"        don't these fuckers learn

hopefully he can get to FOX NEWS and do everything he can to undermine this agreement today.

The idea of disassembling Iran's weapons program completely undermines the war drum he and other chickenhawk repubs like to beat.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
240 you are sooooooooooooooooooooooo oooooooo fucking full of shit. This deal does nothing like that
L