Author Topic: Jason statham : numbers are in  (Read 9945 times)

HTexan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20031
  • Heath must lose!!
Re: Jason statham
« Reply #25 on: April 03, 2015, 05:35:40 PM »
This weekend Jason Statham will show you the difference between starring in a movie with action heroes Arnold & Sly,  vs. Vin Diesel & the Rock.   



This should be interesting and send a clear message





Wooossshhhhhhhhh
furious seven was a great movie!!!
A

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12122
  • Getbig!
Re: Jason statham
« Reply #26 on: April 14, 2015, 05:14:21 AM »
Numbers are in :

Total gross in first two weeks


Expandables 3 -   $19.45 M  and some change

Furios 7 -  251.52 M and counting


So There's a difference between working with Diesel and the Rock, opposed to working with  Arnold and Sly .



WoooSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH HHH   TA NA KA

Kwon_2

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 33809
  • Pretty sure he isn't in Ibiza getting the girls
Re: Jason statham
« Reply #27 on: April 14, 2015, 07:38:46 AM »
Statham just rehashes the same shit over
and over....at least the Rock can do kids movies
and play Tarzan ..

Statham is dependable.

You know what you're going to get.

With Rock you either get Scorpion King or Tooth Fairy  :D ;D

Pray_4_War

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15801
  • Thot Expert
Re: Jason statham : numbers are in
« Reply #28 on: April 14, 2015, 09:10:18 AM »
I really liked Statham in Snatch and The Transporter.  After that I had my fill of him.  The dude does a lot of the same kind of movies.

ritch

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 10673
Re: Jason statham
« Reply #29 on: April 14, 2015, 09:26:11 AM »
Even elephants do this after watching a Statham movie



That is one stoked elephant!!!

But Statham as Bond?
That can't be serious. He lacks the overall class/refinement factor I find.
?

wikkedonez

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1546
Re: Jason statham : numbers are in
« Reply #30 on: April 14, 2015, 09:42:01 AM »
Fast 7 killed it at the box office because of
Paul Walkers death and 0 to do with Statham..

Carlton G. Long

  • Guest
Re: Jason statham : numbers are in
« Reply #31 on: April 14, 2015, 09:53:21 AM »
Fast 7 killed it at the box office because of
Paul Walkers death and 0 to do with Statham..

exactly


It's just like The Ten Commandments.  Moses has been dead for years.

Montague

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14614
  • The black degelation does not know this nig - V.G.
Re: Jason statham : numbers are in
« Reply #32 on: April 14, 2015, 04:28:34 PM »
Fast 7 killed it at the box office because of
Paul Walkers death and 0 to do with Statham..


Same with Heath Ledger and The Dark Night.

HTexan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20031
  • Heath must lose!!
Re: Jason statham : numbers are in
« Reply #33 on: April 14, 2015, 05:30:24 PM »

Same with Heath Ledger and The Dark Night.
heath did a great job in that role tho.
A

Schnauzer

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4895
Re: Jason statham : numbers are in
« Reply #34 on: April 14, 2015, 05:56:19 PM »

Montague

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14614
  • The black degelation does not know this nig - V.G.
Re: Jason statham : numbers are in
« Reply #35 on: April 14, 2015, 06:43:13 PM »
heath did a great job in that role tho.


Oh, absolutely.

But, his death most certainly drew the film a ton of extra attention that it may not have otherwise gotten.

Hypo

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 878
Re: Jason statham : numbers are in
« Reply #36 on: April 15, 2015, 04:57:07 AM »
heath did a great job in that role tho.

That Oscar deserved to go to Robert Downey Jr.

FACT.