robert deniro is a feminist cuck

[The Ugly]

The bitch is a high priestess in Satanism.
She has killed a lot of babies ritualistically.

 

[GigantorX]

Ok so who's a better candidate?  And if you say Ted Cruz you're not very smart.

There aren't any.

What has made her a qualified a candidate up to this point?

-Unqualified to be a Senator
-Joke of a Secretary of State (also unqualified)
-First Lady who...did what? Put out fires for her husband? Be humiliated in front of the world?
-Shes a woman?

She's been living on stored up "favors" for 2 or more decades, she isn't bright, well spoken or anything. She's also a terrible politician. People have been brainwashed into thinking Hillary has had some rockstar career in politics and such, just racking up wins and all that until she can take the rightful throne! No, she got embarrassed in 2008, her media thrall turned against her in a heartbeat and beat her death. She has zero resume and zero qualifications. W. Bush may very well have been the "Accidental President," fine, but at least he was Governor of a major state. She has a resume that would fit on a post it note with no track record of success, only failure and humiliation.

Too much dirt and too many horrible soundbites. She's also old as hell and tired as hell.

C'mon, her big tag line during the last election was "Oh and aren't you ready to elect the first woman President???" or some such embarrassing shit.

Elizabeth Warren is bad, but Hillary is worse.

[XFACTOR]

What has made her a qualified a candidate up to this point?

-Unqualified to be a Senator
-Joke of a Secretary of State (also unqualified)
-First Lady who...did what? Put out fires for her husband? Be humiliated in front of the world?
-Shes a woman?

She's been living on stored up "favors" for 2 or more decades, she isn't bright, well spoken or anything. She's also a terrible politician. People have been brainwashed into thinking Hillary has had some rockstar career in politics and such, just racking up wins and all that until she can take the rightful throne! No, she got embarrassed in 2008, her media thrall turned against her in a heartbeat and beat her death. She has zero resume and zero qualifications. W. Bush may very well have been the "Accidental President," fine, but at least he was Governor of a major state. She has a resume that would fit on a post it note with no track record of success, only failure and humiliation.

Too much dirt and too many horrible soundbites. She's also old as hell and tired as hell.

C'mon, her big tag line during the last election was "Oh and aren't you ready to elect the first woman President???" or some such embarrassing shit.

Elizabeth Warren is bad, but Hillary is worse.

You didn't answer the questions who's the better candidate?

[Hulkotron]

The bitch is a high priestess in Satanism.
She has killed a lot of babies ritualistically.

x2

[Stephano]

I like De Niro as an actor but have never understood his life choices. Look at his wife and children. None of his kids even look like him. He could have had a beautiful white wife but instead...

I think the elites have totally brainwashed him or he does it to benefit his career. Trying to win PC points...

You keep using this word "elites".  What the hell do you mean by it, specifically?

[Stephano]

For the record, Hillary Clinton doesn't deserve to be President -- she deserves to be ostracized, as the Athenian Greeks would have handled a power-hungry would-be tyrant. 
And DeNiro's an idiot.  He's not brainwashed by "elites" -- he's just a fucking idiot.  No excuses.

[kawaks]

All my respect for him gone in seconds

This time De Niro was asked about Hillary.

“Hopefully it will be her, yes,"

Why aren't these uppity elite white women subject to the draft?

Why aren't these same women having their heads shaved and treated the same as men?

Why aren't our 'egalitarian' women representing 52% of the population defending THEIR EQUAL RIGHTS rather than expecting the 'other' 48% (boys and men) to die and be maimed while doing it all for them?

Gender privileged, self preserving, sexist women, anyone? YUP YUP YUP!

[muscleman-2013]

All my respect for him gone in seconds


This time De Niro was asked about Hillary.

“Hopefully it will be her, yes,” said De Niro of the former Secretary of State’s chances next fall. “I think that she’s paid her dues. There are going to be no surprises, and she has earned the right to be president and the head of the country at this point. It’s that simple. And she’s a woman, which is very important because her take on things may be what we need right now.”

http://www.breitbart.com/big-hollywood/2015/04/03/here-comes-hollywood-robert-de-niro-endorses-hillary-clinton/

This is the same Hilary Clinton that is caught on tape laughing about how she got a child rapist off the hook?  Does Robert De Niro know that this is the "sort of woman" she is?

[Parker]

The sad thing is that you had respect for him at all...

[The Abdominal Snoman]

Hillary Rodham Clinton, Age
67 years (October 26, 1947)


Worldwide, the average life expectancy at birth was 71.0 years (68.5 years for males and 73.5 years for females) over the period 2010–2013 according to United Nations World Population Prospects 2012 Revision, or 70.7 years (68.2 years for males and 73.2 years for females) for 2009 according to The World Factbook.


Who in their right mind would elect a 70 year old woman to office? She's a fucking fossil...

[2Thick]

Yes, she's really fucking brilliant and qualified.  

As for who would be better, any of the current Republicans would be better for me and for the country in general. Preferably one who prefers less government; fewer and lower taxes, entitlements, and regs; and not weakening the military and empowering our enemies while alienating our allies.

She's an unqualified, elitist sociopath and completely clueless on economic matters.

DeNiro is a great actor but a typical Hollyweird leftist loon.

I don't give a fuck about who's running Canada or Great Britain or wherever - as long as it doesn't affect me or my country I don't care. I don't get why so many foreigners are so concerned about who's running the US and so goddamned arrogant to think they know better than I do who or what is best for me. I don't want the US to be anymore like Europe or wherever than it already is - so take anything along those lines and shove it.

[Thong Maniac]

Yes, she's really fucking brilliant and qualified.  

As for who would be better, any of the current Republicans would be better for me and for the country in general. Preferably one who prefers less government; fewer and lower taxes, entitlements, and regs; and not weakening the military and empowering our enemies while alienating our allies.

She's an unqualified, elitist sociopath and completely clueless on economic matters.

DeNiro is a great actor but a typical Hollyweird leftist loon.

I don't give a fuck about who's running Canada or Great Britain or wherever - as long as it doesn't affect me or my country I don't care. I don't get why so many foreigners are so concerned about who's running the US and so goddamned arrogant to think they know better than I do who or what is best for me. I don't want the US to be anymore like Europe or wherever than it already is - so take anything along those lines and shove it.

Lol ^ arm chair political strategist who has ALL the answers

[2Thick]

Lol ^ arm chair political strategist who has ALL the answers

You're like literally the worst, lamest gimmick ever.

Hopefully you'll soon asphyxiate on a pair of Nasser's old soiled thongs you no doubt paid a whole month's allowance for.

[SF1900]

Yes, she's really fucking brilliant and qualified.  

As for who would be better, any of the current Republicans would be better for me and for the country in general. Preferably one who prefers less government; fewer and lower taxes, entitlements, and regs; and not weakening the military and empowering our enemies while alienating our allies.

She's an unqualified, elitist sociopath and completely clueless on economic matters.

DeNiro is a great actor but a typical Hollyweird leftist loon.

I don't give a fuck about who's running Canada or Great Britain or wherever - as long as it doesn't affect me or my country I don't care. I don't get why so many foreigners are so concerned about who's running the US and so goddamned arrogant to think they know better than I do who or what is best for me. I don't want the US to be anymore like Europe or wherever than it already is - so take anything along those lines and shove it.

Well, she is sort of right about trickle down economics.

The economist John Kenneth Galbraith noted that "trickle-down economics" had been tried before in the United States in the 1890s under the name "horse and sparrow theory." He wrote, "Mr. David Stockman has said that supply-side economics was merely a cover for the trickle-down approach to economic policy—what an older and less elegant generation called the horse-and-sparrow theory: 'If you feed the horse enough oats, some will pass through to the road for the sparrows.'" Galbraith claimed that the horse and sparrow theory was partly to blame for the Panic of 1896.[13]

Proponents of Keynesian economics and other related theories often claim the wealthy tax cuts are, in fact, not used for the benefit and productive asset of investing but rather for personal gain.[14][15]

While running against Reagan for the Presidential nomination in 1980, George H. W. Bush derided Reaganomics as "voodoo economics".[16] Similarly, In the 1992 presidential election, Independent candidate Ross Perot called trickle-down economics "political voodoo."[17]

In New Zealand, Labour Party MP Damien O'Connor has, in the Labour Party campaign launch video for the 2011 general election, called trickle-down economics "the rich pissing on the poor".

A 2012 study by the Tax Justice Network indicates that wealth of the super-rich does not trickle down to improve the economy, but tends to be amassed and sheltered in tax havens with a negative effect on the tax bases of the home economy.[18]

University of Cambridge professor Ha-Joon Chang criticised the policies of trickle down in several publications, citing examples of: "slowing job growth in the last few decades, rising income inequality in most rich nations, and the inability provision in raising living standards across all income brackets rather than at the top only".[19]


Trickle-down economics, a centerpiece of conservative economic thinking for many decades, failed to deliver its promise of distributing wealth across the economy, a new paper from Harvard University‘s Kennedy School of Government says.

According to this theory, when government policies favor the wealthy — for example, via tax cuts for upper-income classes — the increase in wealth flows down to those with lower incomes. That’s because the rich are more likely to spend the additional income, creating more economic activity, which in turn generates jobs and eventually, better paychecks for the less well-off.

It’s a school of thought that is closely linked to former President Ronald Reagan, and is frequently referred to as “Reaganomics.”

[Agnostic007]

Deniro was always an uber wacko leftist.  Guess you just found this out.

Best to ignore politics.  No matter who is (s)elected, nothing ever changes for the better.  These people do not have any of your best interests at heart... they NEVER did.

This

[2Thick]

When was the last time a poor guy hired you for a job or matched your 401k dollar for dollar?

Do you think the government knows best, and that corps and rich folk really DON'T create wealth for others?

Should the government take the money and redistribute it?

If your Dad earns millions or billions and pays taxes on it all one or more times, do you think the government should take half of it again when he dies and leaves it to you?

What happens when the government goes broke eventually like we're seeing in Europe?

Well, she is sort of right about trickle down economics.

The economist John Kenneth Galbraith noted that "trickle-down economics" had been tried before in the United States in the 1890s under the name "horse and sparrow theory." He wrote, "Mr. David Stockman has said that supply-side economics was merely a cover for the trickle-down approach to economic policy—what an older and less elegant generation called the horse-and-sparrow theory: 'If you feed the horse enough oats, some will pass through to the road for the sparrows.'" Galbraith claimed that the horse and sparrow theory was partly to blame for the Panic of 1896.[13]

Proponents of Keynesian economics and other related theories often claim the wealthy tax cuts are, in fact, not used for the benefit and productive asset of investing but rather for personal gain.[14][15]

While running against Reagan for the Presidential nomination in 1980, George H. W. Bush derided Reaganomics as "voodoo economics".[16] Similarly, In the 1992 presidential election, Independent candidate Ross Perot called trickle-down economics "political voodoo."[17]

In New Zealand, Labour Party MP Damien O'Connor has, in the Labour Party campaign launch video for the 2011 general election, called trickle-down economics "the rich pissing on the poor".

A 2012 study by the Tax Justice Network indicates that wealth of the super-rich does not trickle down to improve the economy, but tends to be amassed and sheltered in tax havens with a negative effect on the tax bases of the home economy.[18]

University of Cambridge professor Ha-Joon Chang criticised the policies of trickle down in several publications, citing examples of: "slowing job growth in the last few decades, rising income inequality in most rich nations, and the inability provision in raising living standards across all income brackets rather than at the top only".[19]


Trickle-down economics, a centerpiece of conservative economic thinking for many decades, failed to deliver its promise of distributing wealth across the economy, a new paper from Harvard University‘s Kennedy School of Government says.

According to this theory, when government policies favor the wealthy — for example, via tax cuts for upper-income classes — the increase in wealth flows down to those with lower incomes. That’s because the rich are more likely to spend the additional income, creating more economic activity, which in turn generates jobs and eventually, better paychecks for the less well-off.

It’s a school of thought that is closely linked to former President Ronald Reagan, and is frequently referred to as “Reaganomics.”

[Thong Maniac]

You're like literally the worst, lamest gimmick ever.

Hopefully you'll soon asphyxiate on a pair of Nasser's old soiled thongs you no doubt paid a whole month's allowance for.

Gimmick? Ive been called that before here. No idea what that means really. Is it impossible to be a legit new poster? Has that never been done before? No brand new people coming here?

Yeah i must be part of the 100 or so banned people over the last couple years. No way could I be new...

Lol, all mad cuz i disagree with your arm chair political opinions. You also mad cuz i root for the redskins over your favorite football team?

Political rants make me
Laugh more than anything else. Some posters on getbig think they could run a country. Laughable

[2Thick]

Gimmick? Ive been called that before here. No idea what that means really. Is it impossible to be a legit new poster? Has that never been done before? No brand new people coming here?

Yeah i must be part of the 100 or so banned people over the last couple years. No way could I be new...

Lol, all mad cuz i disagree with your arm chair political opinions. You also mad cuz i root for the redskins over your favorite football team?

You're the one who started with the insults when I wasn't even talking to you. You're probably a $10 an hour Dem shill college kid and one of those leftist loons who wants the Redskins to change their name because it "offends" you.

I really don't care much about sports - the NFL ain't trying to tax me and my heirs to death, impose more regs on my business, or screw up our national defense. They don't affect me like big government run amok does. Maybe you'll find this out yourself someday.

http://jeffduncan.house.gov/full-list-obamacare-tax-hikes

http://www.atr.org/full-list-ACA-tax-hikes-a6996

[Thong Maniac]

You're the one who started with the insults when I wasn't even talking to you. You're probably a $10 an hour Dem shill college kid and one of those leftist loons who wants the Redskins to change their name because it "offends" you.

I really don't care much about sports - the NFL ain't trying to tax me and my heirs to death, impose more regs on my business, or screw up our national defense. They don't affect me like big government run amok does. Maybe you'll find this out yourself someday.

http://jeffduncan.house.gov/full-list-obamacare-tax-hikes
.

http://www.atr.org/full-list-ACA-tax-hikes-a6996

I dont get all worked up about politics. Both parties want to take your freedom away. I used to be like u and be all hyperpolitical. Its stressful and gets you nowhere. But to each their own. Im more of a libertarian by the way and in my 30s. Once the republicans drop the affiliation with witch craft (christianity) and start being pro-science, id vote republican all day and night. Sadly, someone with my ideas does not have a party to get behind

[Kwon_2]

My father in law spouts all sorts of racist and neo-con shit all the time and im just like "thanks randy, u done yet? I got fun shit to do..."

And you didn't react? Lol pretty beta man

[Voice of Doom]

Sadly, with Hilary it will be more of the same PC nonsense except you will be labeled a misogynist if you disagree with her policies...versus now where you're just racist if you do.   

[2Thick]

I dont get all worked up about politics. Both parties want to take your freedom away. I used to be like u and be all hyperpolitical. Its stressful and gets you nowhere. But to each their own. Im more of a libertarian by the way and in my 30s. Once the republicans drop the affiliation with witch craft (christianity) and start being pro-science, id vote republican all day and night. Sadly, someone with my ideas does not have a party to get behind

For a guy who hates politics, you sure do post in every political thread I've seen recently in what little time I spend here. But you only seem to be interested in attacking or ridiculing anyone whose views are "to the right" of your views. And you wrongly assume everyone who doesn't vote your way is "into witch craft" and is "anti-science". You seem like a paid shill to me - but maybe I'm wrong.

I care about what is important - specifically what is important to me. Too much government overreach. The Constitution being ripped apart more and more. A total lack of fiscal responsibility. More and more taxes and regulations strangling more and more individuals, businesses, and innovations.

Things that impact my business, my clients, my bottom line, the future of the country, etc. And hopefully not being blown up some day by some loon whose own "witch craft" tells him he'll get 72 virgins for blowing me and many others up.

I don't care about witch craft, or what consenting adults do in private, or banning beef and cattle because they supposedly might contribute to increasing the temperature of the planet a fraction of a percent in a million years or so - according to someone who has a vested interest in promoting such nonsense. I'm concerned about what is important.

[Thong Maniac]

For a guy who hates politics, you sure do post in every political thread I've seen recently in what little time I spend here. But you only seem to be interested in attacking or ridiculing anyone whose views are "to the right" of your views. And you wrongly assume everyone who doesn't vote your way is "into witch craft" and is "anti-science". You seem like a paid shill to me - but maybe I'm wrong.

I care about what is important - specifically what is important to me. Too much government overreach. The Constitution being ripped apart more and more. A total lack of fiscal responsibility. More and more taxes and regulations strangling more and more individuals, businesses, and innovations.

Things that impact my business, my clients, my bottom line, the future of the country, etc. And hopefully not being blown up some day by some loon whose own "witch craft" tells him he'll get 72 virgins for blowing me and many others up.

I don't care about witch craft, or what consenting adults do in private, or banning beef and cattle because they supposedly might contribute to increasing the temperature of the planet a fraction of a percent in a million years or so - according to someone who has a vested interest in promoting such nonsense. I'm concerned about what is important.

Paid shill, or gimmick? Which one? Ive only heard conspiracy theorists use "paid shill" in a serious manner

Why u so angry though bro, I was just pointing out how I have no party based on my libertarian-esq view. You dont have to agree, which is why i hate political debates.

Things that matter to me: wife and kids and my dogs and my career. Considering both parties want to fuck us over, siding with one makes no sense

[avxo]

OK but is the best woman Ms. Clinton? Please name one thing she did as a Senator or Secretary of State to make a better world or safer USA?

Well, she did fight hard to prevent Barack Obama from getting the Democratic nomination. That has to count for something, no?

[2Thick]

Paid shill, or gimmick? Which one? Ive only heard conspiracy theorists use "paid shill" in a serious manner

Why u so angry though bro, I was just pointing out how I have no party based on my libertarian-esq view. You dont have to agree, which is why i hate political debates.

Things that matter to me: wife and kids and my dogs and my career. Considering both parties want to fuck us over, siding with one makes no sense

Now you're playing the "conspiracy theorist" card - that's a good one. Did you have to call your supervisor for that one, or is that in your DNC shill handbook?

Would that "career" be posting constantly on getbig 18 hours a day for money? I don't know what's funnier - that or your claim of being "libertarian-esq" and not liking politics and not siding with one party over another.