If you say he looks "great" without further defining what exactly you mean by "great" and without adding any circumstances
it implies that you think he looks great in general no matter the circumstances.
.... that being said I'm just bitching around and agree with you
Although there is one major difference between a "great" 5'2" physique and a great 6'0" physique at least to me - I'd take the 6 foot body but would never
trade bodies with someone shorter than I am (5'11").
Of course there is a difference between a shorter and taller guy. However, even when Franco Columbo stood next to Arnold or Lou, he still had a great physique at 5'5". From a bodybuilding perspective, Arnold looked better, but it doesn't mean that Frank looked like shit either. Just because one bodybuilder looked better than another bodybuilder, it doesn't mean that the other bodybuilder looked bad. In other words, at his prime, Rockell looked great on a bodybuilding stage next to other bodybuilders, as well as when compared to the average joe (obviously).
At 5'6" myself, Id take the body of a shawn ray or dexter jackson.