Author Topic: U.S. Accuses Ex-House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert of Paying to Hide ‘Misconduct’  (Read 1700 times)

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19432
U.S. Accuses Ex-House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert of Paying to Hide ‘Misconduct’
By MONICA DAVEY

CHICAGO — J. Dennis Hastert, the former speaker of the House of Representatives, has been charged with lying to the F.B.I. and making cash withdrawals from banks in a way that was designed to hide that he was paying $3.5 million to someone for his “misconduct” from years ago, a federal indictment released on Thursday said.

Mr. Hastert, 73, the longest-serving Republican speaker, had worked as a lobbyist since leaving office. The indictment, announced by the United States attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, said Mr. Hastert, who was once a high school teacher and wrestling coach in Yorkville, Ill., had so far paid $1.7 million to the person, who had lived in Yorkville and had known Mr. Hastert for most of his or her life. Mr. Hastert worked in Yorkville from 1965 to 1981.

In 2010, during meetings between Mr. Hastert and the unnamed individual, the two discussed “past misconduct” by Mr. Hastert against the person, according to the indictment.

In those meetings and in later discussions, Mr. Hastert agreed to provide money to the person “in order to compensate for and conceal his prior misconduct,” the indictment said. It said he was structuring the cash withdrawals in increments designed to avoid bank reporting requirements. The indictment does not provide details of the misconduct.

Mr. Hastert could not be reached for comment at his office in Washington.

Each of the two charges carries a penalty of as much as five years in prison and a $250,000 fine, the prosecutor’s office said. Mr. Hastert is to appear at an arraignment at a future date, the prosecutors said.

Kimberly Nerheim, a spokeswoman for the United States attorney’s office, declined to identify the person being paid — who was referred to as Individual A in the indictment — or to comment on whether that individual would face any charges.

Mr. Hastert, first elected to Congress from Illinois in 1986, was suddenly catapulted to speaker in 1999 during a moment of crisis for his party. Newt Gingrich had just stepped down after a contentious election marked by wounds the House Republicans inflicted on themselves during impeachment proceedings against President Bill Clinton.

The Republicans’ first choice to succeed Mr. Gingrich, Robert L. Livingston of Louisiana, gave up the position before he ever assumed it, acknowledging that he had carried on adulterous affairs in the past.

Mr. Hastert, who became a popular and unifying leader, was promoted for the job by Representative Tom DeLay of Texas, then a powerful Republican force in the House, largely because of Mr. Hastert’s reputation as a conciliator. Mr. DeLay recognized that he himself was too polarizing for the job.

In office, Mr. Hastert, who was known as “the coach” for his former occupation and his leadership style, pressed a series of health care initiatives and played a leading role in shaping the congressional response to the Sept. 11 attacks.

In 2006, he faced criticism that he and top aides failed to respond to warnings about the behavior of Representative Mark Foley of Florida, whose sexually explicit electronic messages to former Congressional pages sparked a scandal that contributed to the Republicans’ losing their House majority. Mr. Hastert chose not to seek re-election in 2008.

According to the federal indictment made public on Thursday, Mr. Hastert gave money to the unnamed person for four years, starting in 2010.

At first, Mr. Hastert provided $50,000 in cash from several bank accounts to the person every six weeks, for a total of 15 such exchanges, the indictment said.

Banks are required to report cash withdrawals of more than $10,000, and in April 2012, bank officials questioned Mr. Hastert about sizable withdrawals from his accounts.

That July, Mr. Hastert began making smaller withdrawals, of less than $10,000, and he continued providing them to the person at prearranged meeting places and times, the indictment said.

Later, the arrangements changed so that Mr. Hastert was providing $100,000 every three months, the indictment said.

By 2013, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Internal Revenue Service began investigating the withdrawals, focusing, federal authorities said, on whether cash was being taking out in a way that was intended to evade bank reporting requirements.

Last Dec. 8, Mr. Hastert was interviewed by federal agents. He told the agents that he was not paying anyone with the money, but was keeping the withdrawals for himself because he felt unsafe with the banking system.

“Yeah,” Mr. Hastert told the agents, according to the indictment. “I kept the cash. That’s what I’m doing.”

This is not the first time a political figure has attracted attention through banking practices. Eliot Spitzer, then the governor of New York, came to the attention of federal investigators after bank officials noticed that he was moving around thousands of dollars in a manner they thought was intended to conceal the purpose and source of the money. As it turned out, Mr. Spitzer was using the money to pay for prostitutes. He resigned when the payments became public; he was not charged with a crime.

Since leaving office, Mr. Hastert has been a prominent lobbyist in Washington. He is co-leader of the Public Policy & Political Law Practice at the Washington law firm of Dickstein Shapiro, according to the firm’s website.

By Thursday night, Mr. Hastert had resigned from Dickstein Shapiro, an official with the firm said, and his biography had been removed from its website. Mr. Hastert also resigned from the board of the CME Group, the Chicago-based operator of one of the world’s largest futures and derivatives exchanges, a spokeswoman said.

The reaction in Washington was primarily one of astonishment as Republicans tried to absorb the news that Mr. Hastert, elevated in some respects for his upright image, was in such trouble. Allies and former advisers said that they were surprised by the case and that they had no knowledge of the acts described in the indictment. “It has come completely out of left field and is pretty shocking,” said John Feehery, a spokesman for Mr. Hastert in his days as speaker.

In his home state, Republicans seemed stunned by the announcement. Some described Mr. Hastert as a well-liked man whose life story — from small town coach to House speaker — had always been part of his low-key, regular-guy appeal and approachable nature.

“We’re all shocked,” said Pat Brady, the former chairman of the Illinois Republican Party. “It’s been a total shock in the Land of Lincoln. No one had been hearing anything about this. Not a word.”

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19432
Any guesses on what Hastert was paying to keep quiet with all that money?  I see two possibilities:

• a woman he had an affair and perhaps a child with

• a child he violated, perhaps someone he used to coach

The second option, it seems to me, is most likely.  Authorities and news reports have bent over backwards not to identify the gender of the person receiving the payments (it could be male), and they have indicated the person getting the money is someone who has known Hastert for nearly all of (the recipient's life).  What could Hastert possibily think was worth paying millions of dollars to keep quiet after all this time?  Whatever it is, it is obviously most unflattering!  :'(

LurkerNoMore

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 31027
  • Dumb people think Trump is smart.
Any guesses on what Hastert was paying to keep quiet with all that money?  I see two possibilities:

• a woman he had an affair and perhaps a child with

• a child he violated, perhaps someone he used to coach


The second option, it seems to me, is most likely.  Authorities and news reports have bent over backwards not to identify the gender of the person receiving the payments (it could be male), and they have indicated the person getting the money is someone who has known Hastert for nearly all of (the recipient's life).  What could Hastert possibily think was worth paying millions of dollars to keep quiet after all this time?  Whatever it is, it is obviously most unflattering!  :'(

* a male hooker

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19432
Any guesses on what Hastert was paying to keep quiet with all that money?  I see two possibilities:

• a woman he had an affair and perhaps a child with

• a child he violated, perhaps someone he used to coach

The second option, it seems to me, is most likely.  Authorities and news reports have bent over backwards not to identify the gender of the person receiving the payments (it could be male), and they have indicated the person getting the money is someone who has known Hastert for nearly all of (the recipient's life).  What could Hastert possibily think was worth paying millions of dollars to keep quiet after all this time?  Whatever it is, it is obviously most unflattering!  :'(

Was I right or was I right?  ::)

Kazan

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6803
  • Sic vis pacem, parabellum
I'm shocked  ::) another IL politician headed for the big house. At least he'll know some of the other inmates
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ

Straw Man

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 41015
  • one dwells in nirvana
Was I right or was I right?  ::)

apparently if it happened a long time ago then it's just "misconduct"...you know just a little horseplay in the locker room kind of like Sandusky


2Thick

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1703
  • His Thickness
If there's sufficient evidence that he's likely guilty of sexual misconduct with kids or forcing himself on anyone or what have you, I say try the bastard and throw him away for life in a cell with a 400 pound gorilla if they can convict him. Cut his fucking nuts off, kill him, I don't care.

If the statute of limitations has run out or whatever, hopefully someone he's molested will take care of him once and for all.

His party affiliation has nothing to do with anything.

This is why so many liberals suck - if he had been a Democrat, you guys would be making moral equivalence arguments and somehow excusing his behavior because this or that Republican did this or that in the past 5 years or thousand years or whatever. Criminals - especially violent criminals - should not be treated differently by anyone because of their political party affiliation or anything else.


A

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19432
Another man alleges he was abused by Dennis Hastert
By Matt Zapotosky

A man leveling new allegations that he was sexually abused by former U.S. House speaker J. Dennis Hastert will be allowed to speak at Hastert’s sentencing next month — setting up the possibility that the disgraced Republican leader will face a significant public shaming before a federal judge determines what penalty he deserves for paying millions to cover up decades-old misconduct.

The man’s identity and his precise allegations remain unclear, although he seems to be at least the third person to claim that Hastert abused him. The new allegations emerged in a transcript of a hearing that court officials released Wednesday.

Hastert, 74, pleaded guilty last year to violating federal banking laws, admitting in a deal with prosecutors that he withdrew money from banks in increments low enough to avoid mandatory reporting requirements and that he paid someone to keep decades-old misconduct a secret.

A federal law enforcement official has said that the person Hastert paid off was a former male student of Hastert’s who alleged that the former speaker molested him years ago. He is a different person from the man who now might speak at Hastert’s sentencing. Assistant U.S. Attorney Steven Block said prosecutors learned about that man “relatively recently” and asked U.S. District Judge Thomas M. Durkin to delay Hastert’s sentencing so the man could attend, according to the newly released transcript.

Block said that the man was “not a hundred percent certain” he wanted to testify but that “he has been moving in that direction,” according to the transcript.

Over the objection of defense attorneys, Durkin agreed to move the hearing from April 8 to April 27 and asserted that the man, identified in the transcript only as “Individual D,” would be able to detail what he claims happened to him.

“If victims of — and let’s not beat around the bush — if Individual D wants to come in and talk about being a victim of sexual abuse, he’s entitled to do so because that informs my decision about the history and characteristics of the defendant,” Durkin said, according to the transcript. “It’s that simple.”

A spokesman for the U.S. attorney’s office in Chicago declined to comment, and Hastert’s defense attorney did not immediately respond to phone and email messages.

Hastert, a teacher and wrestling coach in Yorkville, Ill., before he entered politics in the early 1980s, has seen his reputation crumble since federal prosecutors alleged in an indictment last year that he agreed to pay someone $3.5 million to cover up “past misconduct.” Although the indictment — and Hastert’s eventual guilty plea — made no mention of any sexual misconduct, word of such allegations quickly slipped out.

A Montana woman has said her brother, too, was abused by Hastert decades ago while he was a student manager on the wrestling team that Hastert coached. She also intends to speak at the sentencing, prosecutors and defense attorneys said, according to the transcript.

Federal sentencing guidelines call for Hastert, who has faced significant health problems in recent months, to face zero to six months in prison, although the judge could deviate from that range.

BayGBM

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 19432
Attorneys for former House speaker Dennis Hastert seek probation for their client
By Matt Zapotosky

Attorneys for former U.S. House speaker and Illinois Republican Dennis Hastert on Wednesday asked a federal judge to sentence their client to a term of probation, saying he was in poor health and already thoroughly shamed by the criminal case against him.

Hastert, 74, pleaded guilty last year to violating federal banking laws, admitting in a deal with prosecutors that he withdrew money from banks in increments low enough to avoid mandatory reporting requirements and that he paid someone to keep decades-old misconduct a secret.

That dull charge revealed more sinister allegations against Hastert, a former teacher and wrestling coach in a high school. A federal law enforcement official has said that the person paid off was a former male student of Hastert’s who alleged that the former speaker sexually molested him years ago.

Writing that the sentencing later this month “will be the most difficult day in Mr. Hastert’s life,” the former speaker’s attorneys urged a federal judge to considerhis deep remorse and his significant medical problems.

“Mr. Hastert’s fall from grace has been swift and devastating,” Hastert’s attorneys wrote. “Neither we as his lawyers, nor Mr. Hastert, have the present insight to understand and reconcile the unfortunate and harmful incidents he caused decades ago with the enduring achievements, leadership, and generosity that earned him extraordinary affection and respect throughout this country during his many years of public service.”

Hastert is scheduled to be sentenced on April 27. Federal sentencing guidelines call for him to face zero to six months in prison, although the judge could deviate from that range.

A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney in Chicago declined to comment on Hastert’s request for probation, saying prosecutors would file their written response by the Friday deadline.

The sentencing is likely to be an emotional affair. Another man leveling allegations of sexual misconduct against Hastert emerged last month, and prosecutors said he is mulling whether to testify at the sentencing hearing. Also expected to speak is a Montana woman who has said her brother, too, was abused by Hastert decades ago while he was a student manager on the wrestling team that Hastert coached.

Hastert’s own sentencing memo makes no specific mention of the sexual abuse allegations, instead focusing on the good he did — both in politics and as a teacher and coach in Illinois — and the humiliation he felt.

Hastert, his attorneys wrote, asked to have his name removed from Wheaton College’s J. Dennis Hastert Center for Economics, Government, and Public Policy because “he wanted to minimize the repercussions felt by the school and its students.”

Hastert’s attorneys also provided extensive details about his failing health, writing that he “needs assistance getting out of bed, toileting, bathing, and dressing himself.”

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
He should go to jail and so should the fuck that was blackmailing him