Gotta love this simple fool. He is in there keeping Getbig honest. I mean, let's talk about theories. SF has a theory about my theory. So what is the test of truth of his theory?
I have published my theory and presented it several times on various discussion boards including Getbig. If the resident experts can't fathom what it is about then that is
too bad. I refuse to spoonfeed knuckleheads.
Mr Turbo, I have put in plenty of effort re the detail including sets and reps and everything else. That is all you need.
Tu Holmes. I have a masters degree in the philosophy of science so should know how to use words like theory. Theory, conjecture, hypothesis are all related.
Pray tell me anything re bodybuilding that is a scientific theory? What about doing what works for you? How about free weights are better than machines?
How about it is all genetics? There is so much bullshit in the broscience here on Getbig and in every gym out there. Nothing will change because bodybuilding
attracts knuckleheads. That doesn't mean that everyone associated with the cult is a dope but goodness me just about everyone believes a lot of rubbish.
Well Vince, here's the thing, first of all, I would love to see that degree and where it was from, because I have only heard of a couple of schools that even have that curriculum.
Secondly, if you don't post your "theory", then what you are actually doing is spouting the same "bro-science" that you are railing against.
Yes, conjecture, hypothesis, and theory are related, but they are not exactly the same.
Theories are tested vigorously and have data to back up the theory. Conjecture is based on incomplete information, and of course, hypothesis is simply a possible explanation.
In regards to your theory. Do you have this data? Can you provide it right now?
Did you observe experimentation of this theory regularly under constant conditions?
If not, then it is as you say, "bro science".
