Your point of posting this is what? To show that some alts can outperform BTC for periods of time? If so, yes, obviously they can. I have explained many times before, I could create an alt tomorrow, sell one coin to myself for double the price, and suddenly I have a 100% gain.
Doge has outperformed BTC from 2014-present - 10 years!
ETH has outperformed BTC from 2015-present - 9 years!
My point is your argument can be flipped on you. You're looking at a shorter time range where BTC has outperformed ETH and using this as evidence that BTC is a superior investment.
Then when I look at a longer time range of three cycles you ask what's the point? Here's a quote from you:
Indeed - almost any alt starts to underperform to BTC after more then one cycle (for obvious reasons).
Here is that quote revised with a valid statement:
Indeed - BTC starts to underperform almost any ALT after more than one cycle (for obvious reasons).What is the obvious reason?
Bitcoin was the first blockchain in 2009. Sure, investors that bought it at 30 cents or $1 saw the most amazing return on investment -
IF they held till now. But they were a few early adopters and some have long since sold their $1 position. Over time, the BTC changed hands. Some people bought BTC at $18,000 in 2017. Then it crashed down to $3,500 or less a few years later. BTC keeps changing hands, and now many new investors have to get in at a higher floor, where BTC is around $90,000. It's harder for that to 10x than a smaller market cap token. Sure, the alt coin might crash 99%. But some have stuck around, like Ethereum, Doge and BNB. Solana is a newcomer. It will have its own hurdles to cross at some point.
Look at Cardano for example. It's had dismal performance over the years. Yet, it is still up 2,450.53% since 2017. That's more than BTC even with Bitcoin now hovering around $90,000!
You're seduced by the big price tag BTC commands.
I agree though, for now, BTC is safer in bear markets for sure. Time will tell if this will be the case 16-24 years from now.