This might sound a bit odd but give me some leeway as I used to argue this in my work profession at times when things looked too easy.
Ponder:
Let’s say 5% can be winners. If we all know the plan. If we all know the end result. If we all know the course. Why would any of that be correct? It can’t be. That’s the point.
We needed something to break (is go wrong) that shifted things in a way to either change the outcome which could have been trend/price/timeline alterations or something to break behaviour in a manner that left the structure intact.
What I saw was social media being the disruptor which has changed behaviour and allowed the structure to remain intact.
In support of my above observation, a 19% pullback does not equal what we are seeing on social media. My entire feed and the comments are filled with people running for the hills. I haven’t seen anything like it during any other pullback.
Fair point, crossed my mind aswell many years ago. Youre probably at the stage where youre seeing so much return on your investment that the old saying "too good to be true " kicks in. And thats a plausible thought if it were any other investment other than btc IMO.
We wont see another investment opportunity like btc in this life time, most likely ever again.
5% may be winners, but we are at 2.2.5% adoption rate with growth exponentially increasing. Projected users 1billion by 2025. We are very early. These 5% winners at this moment are increasing their position. You said it in an earlier post, probably some entity(ies) had inside info on minining outage and deposited 9000btc into binance. Hash rate dropped, price tanked. Day later 22000btc left binance and into cold storage.
Watch the next round of dumps when ETFs start getting rejected. Same old story. Big money increasing their positions using FUD.