That's a shitcoin. It will end up at zero like the rest of the shitcoins.
You need to buy bitcoins because it has fundamentals.
Fundamentally speaking you need to buy on top of me, so I can keep on making money. Then we need to convince others to buy on top of us so we can continue making money. Got it? Now laser up!
And what fundamentals are those? It has a finite supply. So those Zcash - same as Bitcoin. And Zcash is more anonymous. So in theory it would be preferable over Bitcoin?
The only thing Bitcoin has going for it is it was the first crypto. The decentralization argument seems to be untrue as we can see with the miner shutdowns in China. Now they will pick up and move to another nation and become more centralized. You'll have miners in some peanut republic that can have a regime change at the snap of a finger.
The defense that Bitcoin will have sustainable mining but still use a lot of electricity is not as good as one where a proof of stake crypto uses 1% of Bitcoin's electricity. And proof of stake could be more secure if it becomes more decentralized via many staking validators. Bitcoin is only as decentralized as its mining farms allow. If there are 10 or even 1000 massive mining farms it still means that the decentralization is spread over 1000 entities. 100,000 or 1 million staking validators would provide more decentralization.
I am more bullish on Ethereum and Cardano as far as fundamentals go. Look at their percentage returns compared to Bitcoin the past year. Why would I dump $10,000 into Bitcoin when Ethereum and Cardano could offer a bigger return on investment?