Chris Matthews finally asks a tough question...

[Coach is Back!]

He grew a nut....


http://freebeacon.com/politics/matthews-dumbfounds-dnc-chair/

Matthews Dumbfounds DNC Chair

'Tell me the difference between you and a socialist'

The chair of the Democratic National Committee was momentarily speechless after being asked an awkward question about her party and socialism on Thursday.

“What is the difference between a Democrat and a socialist?” MSNBC host Chris Matthews asked Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D., Fla.).

“Uh,” Wasserman-Schultz responded.

“I used to think there was a big difference,” Matthews said. “What do you think?”

“The difference between—the real question is what’s the difference between being a Democrat and being a Republican,” Wasserman-Schultz said.

Matthews didn’t let her off easily.

“Yeah but what’s the big difference between being a Democrat and being a socialist?” Matthews said. “You’re the chairwoman of the Democratic Party. Tell me the difference between you and a socialist.

[Coach is Back!]

Bump

[Coach is Back!]

The libs not saying a word on this speaks volumes.

[240 is Back]

The libs not saying a word on this speaks volumes.

this is the spot where I ask you if Mathews is now credible.

You'll say no, not usually, but only this one time he is.

Then I'll ask you to explain why we should ever trust a shitbag lib like Mathews, and how a lib hosts can be credible only when you agree with him.

Then instead of answering that Q, you'll call me a worthless lib who voted Obama twice (a lie which you repeat).

classic getbig 

[LurkerNoMore]

this is the spot where I ask you if Mathews is now credible.

You'll say no, not usually, but only this one time he is.

Then I'll ask you to explain why we should ever trust a shitbag lib like Mathews, and how a lib hosts can be credible only when you agree with him.

Then instead of answering that Q, you'll call me a worthless lib who voted Obama twice (a lie which you repeat).

classic getbig 

hahahaha

[LurkerNoMore]

"You just don't get it."

"Libs responses..."

 

There are those two excuses are out of the way.

[240 is Back]

"You just don't get it."
"Libs responses..."
There are those two excuses are out of the way.

3)  7500 lines of text from a RUSH transcript he didn't actually listen to, but might be related possibly.

4) The past from 1958 to 1991 was relevant, down to obama's kindergarten doodlings.  All history from 1992 Clinton Voting to 2009 Trump kissing obama's ass is "old shit" not to be brought up, and everything 2010 to today is valid also.

[Coach is Back!]

this is the spot where I ask you if Mathews is now credible.

You'll say no, not usually, but only this one time he is.

Then I'll ask you to explain why we should ever trust a shitbag lib like Mathews, and how a lib hosts can be credible only when you agree with him.

Then instead of answering that Q, you'll call me a worthless lib who voted Obama twice (a lie which you repeat).

classic getbig 

This is where your spin shines. It was a question by a socialist that another socialist couldn't answer. This is the best you could come with?

"How....are....democrats. ....different.....from.. ...socialists"?

See how simple that question was. It's been on here 2-3 days and it took two bumps to get a non-answer. lol

[240 is Back]

Both parties are socialist.  Both taken $ from people and redistribute.  Dems take more.  Repubs take less.  but BOTH take away from the rich and give to the poor.  Again, dems just take more. 

The only "non-socialist" system would be the flat tax, and I think Rand is the only one who has even flirted with that.

So will you now admit that Repubs are just "less" socialist?

[Dos Equis]

Pretty funny.     Did she ever answer the question?

[Coach is Back!]

Pretty funny.     Did she ever answer the question?

No, and neither did 240

[Dos Equis]

No, and neither did 240

Shocking.   

[Skip8282]

this is the spot where I ask you if Mathews is now credible.

You'll say no, not usually, but only this one time he is.

Then I'll ask you to explain why we should ever trust a shitbag lib like Mathews, and how a lib hosts can be credible only when you agree with him.

Then instead of answering that Q, you'll call me a worthless lib who voted Obama twice (a lie which you repeat).

classic getbig 

Worthless 2x Obama voting lib.

What does his credibility have to do with her inability to answer?

[240 is Back]

Worthless 2x Obama voting lib.

What does his credibility have to do with her inability to answer?

the thread is about mathews.  his name is even in the thread title.  not wassershit. 

coach wanted to point out how MATHEWS finally did something he liked.

[Coach is Back!]

. 

coach wanted to point out how MATHEWS finally did something he liked.

And it drives you crazy that a lib owned another lib....and he probably didn't even realize it.

[240 is Back]

do you admit both parties are socialist, and that dems are just dedicated to giving MORE of the wealthy's $ to the poor?

I mean, the repubs support it too.  Just less $.   So you support less socialism, right?