Well, they know how to use a rifle, can track in the African bush and have no problem killing things. All of these make them much more likely to survive than the average pudgy progressive retard flailing with nunchuks at her head.
HTH.
But that is the not your original premise. Your original statement was that if someone tried to commit violence against that women, she would have a real man to protect her and inflict violence the likes of which we have never seen on the perpetrator. We are not talking about surviving in the jungle. We are talking about surviving in "real life." Thus, the idea that you think because he can hunt in the jungle and kill there, that he will be able to ward off an attacker in "real life" is ridiculous. Sure, he may be able to protect her in the jungle, but on the streets is a whole different ball game. You're assuming because he hunts, this provides him with a unique skill set to inflict violence the likes of which has never been seen before. Maybe in the jungle, but probably not so much in "real life."
One, killing a human being is fundamentally different than killing a peaceful giraffe eating some leaves off a tree 100 yards away.
Second, there are probably millions of gang members who inflict violence on others, the likes of which would never be seen or experienced by your average backward hunter. I highly doubt the crips are off hunting in some jungle.
Conclusion: Your statement that "who will protect her with the kind of violence you can only dream about" is erroneous. There is no good reason to believe that hunters will be any more or less violent than someone who doesn't hunt, just because they can kill a giraffe 100 yards out with a rifle.
HTH
