Anyone actually gonna watch the democrat debate tonite??

[polychronopolous]

Looks like a lineup of old white 1850s Slavemasters.

[Primemuscle]

its funny because the dems and their media hatchetmen are always trying to cast the narrative that republicans are the only the party for the white, rich, old men while the Dems are 'inclusive' and care about 'diversity' and are the party of minorities..

yet the repub candidates include:

-a black man (not Obama black, real black)
-an indian American
-2 Hispanics

while the dems candidates include:
-all white, all old, all rich

LMFAO

[Dos Equis]

Looks like a lineup of old white 1850s Slavemasters.

Are you saying they are missing the late Senator Robert "KKK" Byrd? 

[polychronopolous]

Are you saying they are missing the late Senator Robert "KKK" Byrd? 

Actually come to think of it, it appears the Democrats holding the real power haven't changed much at all since the 1850s.

[Dos Equis]

Actually come to think of it, it appears the Democrats holding the real power haven't changed much at all since the 1850s.

Well they certainly rewrote history regarding their race history.  And their emphasis on government dependence is just another race-neutral form of slavery. 

[Straw Man]

Well they certainly rewrote history regarding their race history.  And their emphasis on government dependence is just another race-neutral form of slavery.  

"they" sure did

All them racist Dems became Republicans

you know that

Don't you Bum

[Las Vegas]

He has the least amount of wealth of all of the candidates on both sides I believe.

Yes, and it really says something when you consider he's a politician like all the rest except Carson.  

Even Rubio has already pocketed more money than Bernie, and he's about 40 years younger.

[Primemuscle]

Missed the first broadcast, watching it now. I'll write my report after. By the way, I am expecting an "A" on this assignment.

[JOHN MATRIX]

so....most boring, irrelevant debate in modern history?? 

made the 2008-2012 republican lineup look like the dream team...

I wont be watching the others(if they even have any more), I love politics but this was painfully hard to watch it was so freaking boring

[Straw Man]

so....most boring, irrelevant debate in modern history??  

made the 2008-2012 republican lineup look like the dream team...

I wont be watching the others(if they even have any more), I love politics but this was painfully hard to watch it was so freaking boring

interesting premise of yours in this thread

you're actually bragging about past debates where your party lost the election

seems like you're desperate to find something to feel good about

The ratings for this debate were actually far greater than expected (not that ratings for debates actually matter - though you seem to think they do):  http://money.cnn.com/2015/10/14/media/cnn-democratic-debate-ratings-record/

[JOHN MATRIX]

the 2008-2012 republican candidates were total crap, I have no problems saying that, but the 2016 democratic 'field' is making them look like all-stars.

this was seriously the most pathetic presidential lineup and debate ive ever seen.

[Davidtheman100]

the 2008-2012 republican candidates were total crap, I have no problems saying that, but the 2016 democratic 'field' is making them look like all-stars.

this was seriously the most pathetic presidential lineup and debate ive ever seen.

Every post i've seen of yours has been spot on and you've been looking like a real American more and more with every post i see...good stuff


You have a lot of potential to influence people for the better...I hope you continue to educate people with your political knowledge on a larger scale

[240 is Back]

the 2008-2012 republican candidates were total crap, I have no problems saying that, but the 2016 democratic 'field' is making them look like all-stars.

this was seriously the most pathetic presidential lineup and debate ive ever seen.

True.  Rudy or Romney would have been safe presidents, probably won re-election too.

To think, in 2016... the top 3 aren't even politicians.   Carson, FioRINO and Trump... all have made some huge huge impacts, but also some really big fibs, really mean things said, really unprofessional all around.

Repub base doesn't WANT expreienced lawmakers.  They want oddball, off-the-wall, unpredictable wildcard candidates.   

The actual professionals aren't all that great, but solid.  Rand, Rubio, Cruz, Jeb, they'd all be fine presidents.  But the top 3 are jokes, truly - and it's what repubs want.

[Dos Equis]

Watched it.  Not impressed. 

[LurkerNoMore]

Apparently it was boring.  But boring beats terrifying. 

[JOHN MATRIX]

Every post i've seen of yours has been spot on and you've been looking like a real American more and more with every post i see...good stuff


You have a lot of potential to influence people for the better...I hope you continue to educate people with your political knowledge on a larger scale

why thank you good sir

[TuHolmes]

the 2008-2012 republican candidates were total crap, I have no problems saying that, but the 2016 democratic 'field' is making them look like all-stars.

this was seriously the most pathetic presidential lineup and debate ive ever seen.

Really? I personally believe that Mitt Romney can beat EVERY SINGLE Democrat running.

I don't see any of the current Republicans doing that.

[Primemuscle]

Some may have thought the democratic debate was boring, but at least these candidates debated the issues and not who was too ugly to win, etc. The press declared Hillary Clinton the debate winner.

[Las Vegas]

Some may have thought the democratic debate was boring, but at least these candidates debated the issues and not who was too ugly to win, etc. The press declared Hillary Clinton the debate winner.

Hillary has no problem at all with saying whatever the hell sounds good at the moment.  So when someone backs her, I can't figure out what that person is backing.



What's the point?

[Primemuscle]

Hillary has no problem at all with saying whatever the hell sounds good at the moment.  So when someone backs her, I can't figure out what that person is backing.



What's the point?

When someone backs Trump, what are they backing? maybe not a fair comparison since he was not claimed the winner of the 2nd Republican debate.

[240 is Back]

Really? I personally believe that Mitt Romney can beat EVERY SINGLE Democrat running.

I don't see any of the current Republicans doing that.

agreed.  Romney SHOULD have beaten obama, he had him on the ropes, as romney was LEADING IN POLLS after debate #1.

Then hubris got the best of him with the '47% comment' and he lost swing voters.

Romney would wreck this bunch of dems, and would laugh at trump for being an ass.  Romney WOULD win this election.   There's still time for his RINO ass to enter the race.

[JOHN MATRIX]

LMAO, Romney didn't even have the support of his own party's base, and hes is gonna somehow beat a democrat in a general??

you guys don't understand this stuff.

[LurkerNoMore]

I think what he meant was that in 2012, Obama was the most beatable sitting President since Carter.

[240 is Back]

LMAO, Romney didn't even have the support of his own party's base, and hes is gonna somehow beat a democrat in a general??

you guys don't understand this stuff.

the repub party has moved center.

Trump is a lifetime liberal and CLinton butt-buddy.
One year ago today, Carson wasn't even a registered republican.

and they're destroying lifelong republican candidates.

Repubs today have the thinnest base of beliefs - HALF of them are relationship-cheating, drug-using lawbreakers that just hate brown people (mexicans) and black people (obama) and their willingness to ABANDON their core beliefs and support these two johnny-come-lately republicans is proof of that.

[240 is Back]

I think what he meant was that in 2012, Obama was the most beatable sitting President since Carter.

THIS.   if the election was held:

Aug 15, 2008... Mccain wins (Palin hadn't sunk in yet)
Oct 1, 2012... Romney wins (then 47% comment broke)