New Polls - Trump with MASSIVE leads in early primary states

[240 is Back]

Trump leading nevada 38-22 over carson
SC: 36% to 18%
Trump has now led longer than any of the 2012 candidates.
And Walker, who hates Trump and called on anyone to beat him, just said Trump may win the nomination.

87 days in the lead and still going strong.

[JOHN MATRIX]

things are getting harder and harder for the TRUMP deniers out there 

not my first choice but id much prefer him to any of the democrat scumbags.

[Las Vegas]

things are getting harder and harder for the TRUMP deniers out there 

not my first choice but id much prefer him to any of the democrat scumbags.

Can you explain his stands?

[LurkerNoMore]

I'd vote for him just for the entertainment aspect alone.

[240 is Back]

Can you explain his stands?

Trump is purposefully vague on the issues.  He doesn't want to alienate the base, who loves him for his rudeness, BUT he also wants to embrace the liberal voters, as he needs them to win and he was 'one of them' for 60+ years of his life.

On russia, he supports obama about letting then bomb syria BUT then he goes on TV anyway and trashes obama for how he handled it.

ON amnesty, he said in July 2015 that he'll let the good illegals stay.  BUT then he went on TV and said the opposite.

ON the Syrian refugees, he said on tv "you have to take them" then 3 days later promised to kick them all out if Obama takes them.

He literally says things to satisfy BOTH sides of the aisle and just keeps it so cluttered and crowded with talk of greatness that people have no time to fact check, he's just on to the next big explosive phrase.

[Las Vegas]

I'd vote for him just for the entertainment aspect alone.

Between Trump and Hillary?

[Las Vegas]

Trump is purposefully vague on the issues.  He doesn't want to alienate the base, who loves him for his rudeness, BUT he also wants to embrace the liberal voters, as he needs them to win and he was 'one of them' for 60+ years of his life.

On russia, he supports obama about letting then bomb syria BUT then he goes on TV anyway and trashes obama for how he handled it.

ON amnesty, he said in July 2015 that he'll let the good illegals stay.  BUT then he went on TV and said the opposite.

ON the Syrian refugees, he said on tv "you have to take them" then 3 days later promised to kick them all out if Obama takes them.

He literally says things to satisfy BOTH sides of the aisle and just keeps it so cluttered and crowded with talk of greatness that people have no time to fact check, he's just on to the next big explosive phrase.

The signs say he's working w Hillary, don't they?  Everything up to this moment, anyway, says that.

[240 is Back]

The signs say he's working w Hillary, don't they?  Everything up to this moment, anyway, says that.

In 2012, alvin Greene was an unemployed, broke dude facing sex charges.  Someone magically gives him $10k to run in a race, and he really disrupts things. 

He was a plant.  It worked at the state level in 2012, why not at the national level this time?

George Will is a highly respected conservative journalist.  He has written over and over, that Trump is a democratic operative, inserted into the race to cause chaos in the GOP, help hilary's chances, and take all the oxygen away so all the repub candidates suffer.

So far, George will is right.

[Las Vegas]

In 2012, alvin Greene was an unemployed, broke dude facing sex charges.  Someone magically gives him $10k to run in a race, and he really disrupts things. 

He was a plant.  It worked at the state level in 2012, why not at the national level this time?

George Will is a highly respected conservative journalist.  He has written over and over, that Trump is a democratic operative, inserted into the race to cause chaos in the GOP, help hilary's chances, and take all the oxygen away so all the repub candidates suffer.

So far, George will is right.

If this is true, how do you think the game might go?  What's to become of Trump by next summer, say?

[whork]

Trump is purposefully vague on the issues.  He doesn't want to alienate the base, who loves him for his rudeness, BUT he also wants to embrace the liberal voters, as he needs them to win and he was 'one of them' for 60+ years of his life.

On russia, he supports obama about letting then bomb syria BUT then he goes on TV anyway and trashes obama for how he handled it.

ON amnesty, he said in July 2015 that he'll let the good illegals stay.  BUT then he went on TV and said the opposite.

ON the Syrian refugees, he said on tv "you have to take them" then 3 days later promised to kick them all out if Obama takes them.

He literally says things to satisfy BOTH sides of the aisle and just keeps it so cluttered and crowded with talk of greatness that people have no time to fact check, he's just on to the next big explosive phrase.

This actually sounds like any modern politician.

[240 is Back]

If this is true, how do you think the game might go?  What's to become of Trump by next summer, say?

Trump will likely be the GOP nominee next summer.  He either wins, or loses, by 40 states.

He will be the nominee because so many self-proclaimed "repubs" are actually drug abusing, law breaking, whoring democrats that feel strongly about 1 or 2 repub issues and/or hate obama because of his pigmentation.

[Davidtheman100]

Trump is purposefully vague on the issues.  He doesn't want to alienate the base, who loves him for his rudeness, BUT he also wants to embrace the liberal voters, as he needs them to win and he was 'one of them' for 60+ years of his life.

On russia, he supports obama about letting then bomb syria BUT then he goes on TV anyway and trashes obama for how he handled it.

ON amnesty, he said in July 2015 that he'll let the good illegals stay.  BUT then he went on TV and said the opposite.

ON the Syrian refugees, he said on tv "you have to take them" then 3 days later promised to kick them all out if Obama takes them.

He literally says things to satisfy BOTH sides of the aisle and just keeps it so cluttered and crowded with talk of greatness that people have no time to fact check, he's just on to the next big explosive phrase.

On Syria, he said he was told different numbers every single time. Like he was told 2,000 one day that they would be taking in...And he said he's a nice guy even though he doesn't agree with it that's fine....Then he said they changed the number to 10,000 when they asked him again...Then he said well...That's different and that's not what you said...But that's fine we are a nice country...Then the next time they tell him 200,000...And he says absolutely not it can make the trojan horse look like peanuts if this is a planned attack...He said it's not likely that's the case but it's possible...Plus he started talking about the vets and what not which i'm sure you know...

[240 is Back]

10000 refugees is a huge number.  Particularly when Isis has sworn they are sending their people in with them.   Trump has no business saying yes to ten, much less ten thousand

[Davidtheman100]

10000 refugees is a huge number.  Particularly when Isis has sworn they are sending their people in with them.   Trump has no business saying yes to ten, much less ten thousand

lol the dems will take in all of them as far as i know

[LurkerNoMore]

Between Trump and Hillary?

You have to admit that while he wouldn't be the best thing for the country, he would be entertaining as hell to watch fuck up everything.

[240 is Back]

ISIS has said they're sending their guys with the refugees.

IMO, accepting ONE refugee is too many.  Not to trump.  And I cannot accept "he's okay with 10k of them, but not 200k".   Would he be "okay" with only letting in 3 or 4 of the nineteen 9/11 terrorists?

The United States should take in some refugees from Syria, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump said Tuesday night.
"I hate the concept of it, but on a humanitarian basis, you have to," Trump said in his first Fox News appearance in two weeks, appearing on "The O'Reilly Factor."

"This was started by President Obama when he didn't go in and do the job he should have when he drew the line in the sand, which turned out to be a very artificial line," Trump said in reference to Obama's red-line warning to Syrian leader Bashar Assad in 2013. "But you know, it's living in hell in Syria. There's no question about it. They're living in hell, and something has to be done."

[Las Vegas]

You have to admit that while he wouldn't be the best thing for the country, he would be entertaining as hell to watch fuck up everything.

I don't know.  I really don't, because I'm not entirely sure what he's up to.

One thing I'm almost sure of, though, is that Trump will place himself out front and he will expect to take blame for the inevitable fuck-ups.  No way Hillary will do that, so she's much less likely to be concerned about fuck-ups happening in the first place.

[OzmO]

Do repubs really believe TRUMP should be their candidate?

seriously?

[Las Vegas]

Do repubs really believe TRUMP should be their candidate?

seriously?

I think even Republicans are desperate to have someone from "the outside" to take it.  It might explain Jeb's numbers being so low, for one thing.

W and Obama really turned us off to the typical politicians.

[240 is Back]

I think even Republicans are desperate to have someone from "the outside" to take it.

yep.  60% of the repubs are supporting candidates that have never held office (trump, carson and fiorino are 1/2/3)

[Las Vegas]

yep.  60% of the repubs are supporting candidates that have never held office (trump, carson and fiorino are 1/2/3)

Jeb probably thought it was going to be him, and he's probably still a little shocked.  He can't understand why the "little people" would rather not see another Bush ever again.