Author Topic: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...  (Read 7829 times)

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #75 on: October 21, 2015, 12:05:00 PM »
Are you saying the end result would be different or not?

You mean the end result of rogues using the military to violate our rights?

Quote
There are people right now strategizing ways to make coffee illegal.   Should i be concerned?  No.  People hell bent on making guns illegal?  Should i be concerned?  Not at the moment or any time soon.  

When, then?

Quote
Basically what you and tony have seemed to fall prey to standard fear propaganda.  You are even using absolutes to argue it.  

the 2nd amendment is not going to get over turned people.  ::)

Its sad that the republican propaganda machine has resorted into scaring ignorant rednecks.  


OK, it's only "ignorant rednecks" with something to lose.  Keep watching your television and keep getting hypnotized by the lies.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #76 on: October 21, 2015, 12:20:08 PM »
You mean the end result of rogues using the military to violate our rights?

You know what i mean.


Quote
When, then?

When some actual stuff starts happening.

Quote
OK, it's only "ignorant rednecks" with something to lose.  Keep watching your television and keep getting hypnotized by the lies.

Totally misread by you.

That's twice in 1 post.   You have reading comprehension issues?


I suspect you are just trolling now or a broderline CT nut.  I was very clear on what i said on both counts in my previous post. Address your mistakes or what ever they are first before we move on.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #77 on: October 21, 2015, 12:38:29 PM »
You know what i mean.

Yes, I'd say so.

Quote
When some actual stuff starts happening.

after the fact, you mean?

Quote
Totally misread by you.

That's twice in 1 post.   You have reading comprehension issues?


I suspect you are just trolling now or a broderline CT nut.  I was very clear on what i said on both counts in my previous post. Address your mistakes or what ever they are first before we move on.


OK, as long as you understand, then I forgive you.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #78 on: October 21, 2015, 12:38:56 PM »
Yes, I'd say so.

after the fact, you mean?

OK, as long as you understand, then I forgive you.

 ::)

chadstallion

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2854
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #79 on: October 21, 2015, 12:51:38 PM »
about time.
give everyone a gun.
just charge the bejeezus outta the bullets.
w

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #80 on: October 21, 2015, 01:02:47 PM »
about time.
give everyone a gun.
just charge the bejeezus outta the bullets.

both are very expensive anyway lol

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66422
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #81 on: October 21, 2015, 02:24:00 PM »
You know what i mean.


When some actual stuff starts happening.

Totally misread by you.

That's twice in 1 post.   You have reading comprehension issues?


I suspect you are just trolling now or a broderline CT nut.  I was very clear on what i said on both counts in my previous post. Address your mistakes or what ever they are first before we move on.


This is obviously Jack T. Cross.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #82 on: October 21, 2015, 02:39:22 PM »
This is obviously Jack T. Cross.

Wow!   That's what I was thinking. 

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66422
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #83 on: October 21, 2015, 02:55:27 PM »
Wow!   That's what I was thinking. 

Yeah.  He denied it, but not that hard to figure out. 

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #84 on: October 21, 2015, 03:34:19 PM »
Lol, the anti-gun forces make an anti-argument.

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #85 on: October 21, 2015, 03:37:27 PM »
Yeah.  He denied it, but not that hard to figure out. 

Link?

Las Vegas

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 7423
  • ! Repent or Perish !
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #86 on: October 21, 2015, 03:43:15 PM »
I found it.  Good thread.  (it's the one about Whataburger and the police)

Dos Equis

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 66422
  • I am. The most interesting man in the world. (Not)
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #87 on: October 21, 2015, 03:57:32 PM »
I found it.  Good thread.  (it's the one about Whataburger and the police)

Yep.

Ok.  That explains it.  Thanks. 

Las Vegas/Jack T. Cross:  you were referring to the wrong article. 


Close, but no cigar.

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #88 on: October 21, 2015, 04:09:50 PM »
Even if he isn't, it's the same tired trolling tactic. 

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #89 on: October 22, 2015, 11:31:37 AM »
More on the liberal conspiracy headed by the likes of Hillary Clinton and other government hacks to take away your guns little by little until the 2nd amendment disappears.

http://www.opencarrytexas.org/faq.html

As of Jan. 1 2016 you will be able to open carry firearms in Texas.   Now Texas joins 44 other states that allow open carry and 32 of them who require no registration, permit or license to do so.

Yes, you ignorant rednecks, they are coming to get your guns!  Circle your trailers, there's liberals in dem hills coming to take your freedom away!!!!  Freedoms like being able to not to choose cheaper prescription drugs, welfare, planned parent hood, GMO's, and white presidents not born in Kenya.   


240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102387
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #90 on: October 22, 2015, 11:46:38 AM »
I remember ammo and handgun shortages in Dec 2008.  gun store owners were telling us to stock up, the gun bans start in spring 2009.

never really happened, did it?  if anything, idiots like ZImmerman have MORE power to chase and kill under obama's administration.  'stand your ground' is a disaster.  thanks, obama!

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #91 on: October 22, 2015, 11:49:26 AM »
I remember ammo and handgun shortages in Dec 2008.  gun store owners were telling us to stock up, the gun bans start in spring 2009.

never really happened, did it?  if anything, idiots like ZImmerman have MORE power to chase and kill under obama's administration.  'stand your ground' is a disaster.  thanks, obama!

This liberal conspiracy is out of control.  Hold your children close and protect them, but hold your guns closer! 

TuHolmes

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5565
  • Darkness is fated to eventually be destroyed...
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #92 on: October 22, 2015, 06:08:39 PM »
More on the liberal conspiracy headed by the likes of Hillary Clinton and other government hacks to take away your guns little by little until the 2nd amendment disappears.

http://www.opencarrytexas.org/faq.html

As of Jan. 1 2016 you will be able to open carry firearms in Texas.   Now Texas joins 44 other states that allow open carry and 32 of them who require no registration, permit or license to do so.

Yes, you ignorant rednecks, they are coming to get your guns!  Circle your trailers, there's liberals in dem hills coming to take your freedom away!!!!  Freedoms like being able to not to choose cheaper prescription drugs, welfare, planned parent hood, GMO's, and white presidents not born in Kenya.   



Well, to be fair... It's a backlash against the idea that the 2nd amendment is under attack.

Now, also, let's be clear... While on a national level, Democrats do seem to have it pretty good, on a local level, most localities are Republican.

That's just how it goes. It's good to have a stalemate at times, although it seems as if the President does get to do more of what he wants.

tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #93 on: October 23, 2015, 05:29:45 AM »
I don't have a problem with law that makes illegal to keep a loaded gun in a house with children.  But if there isn't a law like that I really don't have a problem with it either.  You are still a dumbass if you do have loaded gun with kids in the house and should probably spend a day with a parent whose kid hand an accident with one and killed himself or someone else. 

Earlier I ask you what exactly they doing and so far you have given me inaccurate magazine limit that only exists in 8 states and charged that all these laws only help criminals which I have shown isn't true.  And accusations about people's intentions which isn't anything until something is actually done like a law.

Anything else?
How about tha awb ban? Was that not aimed at taking away guns???

So you think that intentions and desires count for nothing until a law is passed?


tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #94 on: October 23, 2015, 05:32:08 AM »
So when they made the seat belts laws those are bits and pieces that eventually will lead to us not being to drive or when they made the cell phone law while driving those are bits and pieces that eventually will lead us to not being able to use cell phones.

Your #2 is straight fear propaganda bullshit in this instance. 
Who wants to ban cell phones?

There are politicians that are openly for taking away guns or talking about taking away guns, when you have people in the position to propose and pass legislation to take guns away...it isn't fear propaganda

kh300

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4362
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #95 on: October 23, 2015, 07:40:32 AM »

California's magazine capacity is 10, so is New York.  Colorado's is 15.   Not sure why you stated "7 rounds"  In which state is it 7 rounds?

What Cumo said, doesn't mean much in this discussion because i am asking what exactly has been set into law.  I am sure we could dig up all sorts of stuff of what people say, but until laws are passed it don't me jack.

What California and other states are "always trying to make" is also moot in this discussion because we are talking about laws that have been passed and there will always be a group of peeps against all guns who will try and always pass stupid laws in most states.  Except prolly Montana, Wyoming, Kansas, etc.  

In my mind, keeping ammo and guns separated when traveling with them is not unreasonable and doesn't support your  "laws that make it so only rich people can have guns" argument.

Regarding your "sole purpose" argument.  This is gun regulation.   Some of it seems ok.  If you have a loaded gun in your house and have children you are an idiot.  It should be illegal.  If you don't have kids and want a loaded gun in your house how are the police going to know if they don't enough probable cause to search your house with a warrant?  This seems like something that doesn't need to get all up in arms about.

It seems like you are buying into right wing propaganda here.  You are off on magazine limits and don't seem to realize that 42 states don't have magazine limits.  

I am pro 2nd amendment.  Always will be.  But i don't see anything too out of line happening.  Maybe i am wrong.  But what i do see is a lot of fear propaganda when it comes to gun control.


NY state law is 7 rounds in the mag. But you can actually carry 8 if you have one in the chamber. Cumo even admitted they never thought of that before it passed, showing how little they know about guns.


tonymctones

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 26520
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #96 on: October 23, 2015, 07:55:25 AM »
NY state law is 7 rounds in the mag. But you can actually carry 8 if you have one in the chamber. Cumo even admitted they never thought of that before it passed, showing how little they know about guns.


it is funny to listen to these pro gun control people talking about guns bc inevitably they say something the shows they know nothing about them.


OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #97 on: October 23, 2015, 07:59:10 AM »
NY state law is 7 rounds in the mag. But you can actually carry 8 if you have one in the chamber. Cumo even admitted they never thought of that before it passed, showing how little they know about guns.



Nope, its 10 rounds.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_laws_in_New_York

http://www.capitalnewyork.com/article/albany/2013/12/8538119/judge-strikes-down-bullet-limit-upholds-law

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/01/nyregion/federal-judge-upholds-majority-of-new-york-gun-law.html?_r=0

OzmO

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22846
  • Drink enough Kool-aid and you'll think its healthy
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #98 on: October 23, 2015, 07:59:58 AM »
it is funny to listen to these pro gun control people talking about guns bc inevitably they say something the shows they know nothing about them.



What's funny is people's mass hysteria based on the absence of fact

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: "Were not coming for your guns", except when they are...
« Reply #99 on: October 23, 2015, 08:03:45 AM »
shot with a semi automatic weapon as opposed to what....they don't realize that semi auto means one pull one shot. If its a hand gun in 99.9% of the cases its friggen semi auto....its just a media phase to scare people. Most auto pistols go for like 5 grand and most class 3 license holders don't commit gun crimes. Guns like that are a collector oddity..like the Beretta M93R. They have one at my prefered gun store....I don't see the point.
L